1. 15 Mar, 2010 1 commit
    • Sergey Petrunya's avatar
      Apply fix by Roy Lyseng: · 47d0cf29
      Sergey Petrunya authored
      Bug#48623: Multiple subqueries are optimized incorrectly
            
      The function setup_semijoin_dups_elimination() has a major loop that
      goes through every table in the JOIN object. Usually, there is a normal
      "plus one" increment in the for loop that implements this, but each semijoin
      nest is treated as one entity and there is another increment that skips past
      the semijoin nest to the next table in the JOIN object. However, when
      combining these two increments, the next joined table is skipped, and if that
      happens to be the start of another semijoin nest, the correct processing
      for that nest will not be carried out.
      
      mysql-test/r/subselect_sj.result:
        Added test results for bug#48623
      mysql-test/r/subselect_sj_jcl6.result:
        Added test results for bug#48623
      mysql-test/t/subselect_sj.test:
        Added test case for bug#48623
      sql/opt_subselect.cc:
        Omitted the "plus one" increment in the for loop, added "plus one"
        in the remaining switch case, fixed coding style issue in remaining
        increment operations.
      47d0cf29
  2. 14 Mar, 2010 3 commits
  3. 13 Mar, 2010 2 commits
    • Sergey Petrunya's avatar
      Apply fix by oystein.grovlen@sun.com 2010-03-12: · ea982e33
      Sergey Petrunya authored
      Bug#48213 Materialized subselect crashes if using GEOMETRY type
      
      The problem occurred because during semi-join a materialized table
      was created which contained a GEOMETRY column, which is a specialized
      BLOB column.  This caused an segmentation fault because such tables will
      have extra columns, and the semi-join code was not prepared for that.
      
      The solution is to disable materialization when Blob/Geometry columns would 
      need to be materialized.  Blob columns cannot be used for index look-up 
      anyway, so it does not makes sense to use materialization.
      
      This fix implies that it is detected earlier that subquery materialization
      can not be used.  The result of that is that in->exist optimization may
      be performed for such queries.  Hence, extended query plans for such
      queries had to be updated.
      
      mysql-test/r/subselect_mat.result:
        Update extended query plan for subqueries that cannot use materialization
        due to Blobs.
      mysql-test/r/subselect_sj.result:
        Updated result file.
      mysql-test/r/subselect_sj_jcl6.result:
        Update result file.
      mysql-test/t/subselect_sj.test:
        Add test case for Bug#48213 that verifies that semi-join works when subquery select list contain Blob columns.  Also verify that materialization is not
        used.
      sql/opt_subselect.cc:
        Disable materialization for semi-join/subqueries when the subquery select list
        contain Blob columns.
      ea982e33
    • Sergey Petrunya's avatar
      BUG#45174: XOR in subqueries produces differing results in 5.1 and 5.4 · 02e9fa62
      Sergey Petrunya authored
      BUG#50019: Wrong result for IN-subquery with materialization
      - Fix equality substitution in presense of semi-join materialization, lookup and scan variants
        (started off from fix by Evgen Potemkin, then modified it to work in all cases)
      02e9fa62
  4. 07 Mar, 2010 1 commit
    • Sergey Petrunya's avatar
      BUG#49129: Wrong result with IN-subquery with join_cache_level=6 and firstmatch=off · c2924e15
      Sergey Petrunya authored
      - The problem was that DuplicateWeedout strategy setup code wasn't aware of the 
        fact that join buffering will be used and applied optimization that doesn't work
        together with join buffering. Fixed by making DuplicateWeedout setup code to have 
        a pessimistic check about whether there is a chance that join buffering will be 
        used.
      - Make JOIN_CACHE_BKA::init() correctly process Copy_field elements that denote saving
        current rowids in the join buffer.
      
      mysql-test/r/subselect_sj2.result:
        Update test results
      mysql-test/r/subselect_sj2_jcl6.result:
        Update test results
      mysql-test/r/subselect_sj_jcl6.result:
        Testcase
      mysql-test/t/subselect_sj2.test:
        Update test results
      mysql-test/t/subselect_sj_jcl6.test:
        Testcase
      sql/opt_subselect.cc:
        - The problem was that DuplicateWeedout strategy setup code wasn't aware of the 
          fact that join buffering will be used and applied optimization that doesn't work
          together with join buffering. Fixed by making DuplicateWeedout setup code to have 
          a pessimistic check about whether there is a chance that join buffering will be 
          used.
      sql/sql_join_cache.cc:
        Make JOIN_CACHE_BKA::init() correctly process Copy_field elements that denote saving current rowids in the join buffer.
      sql/sql_select.cc:
        Added a question note
      c2924e15
  5. 06 Mar, 2010 1 commit
    • Igor Babaev's avatar
      Fixed bug #51092. · 1c7ba7ba
      Igor Babaev authored
      The function JOIN_CACHE::read_all_record_fields could return 0
      for an incremental join cache in two cases:
      1. there were no more records in the associated join buffer
      2. there was no table fields stored in the join buffer.
      As a result the function JOIN_CACHE::get_record() could
      return prematurely and did not read all needed fields from
      join buffers into the record buffer.
      
      Now the function JOIN_CACHE::read_all_record_fields returns
      -1 if there are no more records in the associated join buffer.
      1c7ba7ba
  6. 05 Mar, 2010 1 commit
  7. 25 Feb, 2010 1 commit
  8. 24 Feb, 2010 1 commit
    • Sergey Petrunya's avatar
      Bug#49198 Wrong result for second call of of procedure with view in subselect. · 0e7c8415
      Sergey Petrunya authored
      Re-worked fix of Tor Didriksen:
       The problem was that fix_after_pullout() after semijoin conversion 
       wasn't propagated from the view to the underlying table. 
       On subesequent executions of the prepared statement, 
       we would mark the underlying table as 'dependent' and the predicate 
       anlysis would lead to a different (and illegal) execution plan.
      0e7c8415
  9. 23 Feb, 2010 1 commit
  10. 21 Feb, 2010 4 commits
  11. 20 Feb, 2010 1 commit
  12. 17 Feb, 2010 4 commits
  13. 15 Feb, 2010 1 commit
  14. 12 Feb, 2010 1 commit
  15. 11 Feb, 2010 7 commits
  16. 28 Jan, 2010 1 commit
  17. 18 Jan, 2010 1 commit
  18. 17 Jan, 2010 4 commits
  19. 01 Jan, 2010 1 commit
  20. 27 Dec, 2009 1 commit
    • Sergey Petrunya's avatar
      DS-MRR backport: fix buildbot valgrind failures: · 1a490f2d
      Sergey Petrunya authored
      - Do call update_used_tables() for new conditions obtained when adding
        outer join's triggered conditions. Correct values of used_tables() are
        now needed for condition pushdown.
      - Update test results
      
      mysql-test/suite/pbxt/r/join_outer.result:
        DS-MRR backport:
        - Update test results
      sql/sql_select.cc:
        DS-MRR backport: fix buildbot valgrind failures:
        - Do call update_used_tables() for new conditions obtained when adding
          outer join's triggered conditions. Correct values of used_tables() are
          now needed for condition pushdown.
      1a490f2d
  21. 22 Dec, 2009 2 commits