- 27 Jan, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Tor Didriksen authored
Fixed the 'show profile source' part of the bug. Leaving SHOW ENGINE INNODB MUTEX to a separate patch.
-
- 26 Jan, 2011 12 commits
-
-
Mattias Jonsson authored
bug#57924 does not occur in 5.5, so I reverted the 5.1 specific code and used the errors from 5.5 instead in the tests
-
Mattias Jonsson authored
-
Mattias Jonsson authored
-
Jon Olav Hauglid authored
that implement add_index The problem was that ALTER TABLE blocked reads on an InnoDB table while adding a secondary index, even if this was not needed. It is only needed for the final step where the .frm file is updated. The reason queries were blocked, was that ALTER TABLE upgraded the metadata lock from MDL_SHARED_NO_WRITE (which blocks writes) to MDL_EXCLUSIVE (which blocks all accesses) before index creation. The way the server handles index creation, is that storage engines publish their capabilities to the server and the server determines which of the following three ways this can be handled: 1) build a new version of the table; 2) change the existing table but with exclusive metadata lock; 3) change the existing table but without metadata lock upgrade. For InnoDB and secondary index creation, option 3) should have been selected. However this failed for two reasons. First, InnoDB did not publish this capability properly. Second, the ALTER TABLE code failed to made proper use of the information supplied by the storage engine. A variable need_lock_for_indexes was set accordingly, but was not later used. This patch fixes this problem by only doing metadata lock upgrade before index creation/deletion if this variable has been set. This patch also changes some of the related terminology used in the code. Specifically the use of "fast" and "online" with respect to ALTER TABLE. "Fast" was used to indicate that an ALTER TABLE operation could be done without involving a temporary table. "Fast" has been renamed "in-place" to more accurately describe the behavior. "Online" meant that the operation could be done without taking a table lock. However, in the current implementation writes are always prohibited during ALTER TABLE and an exclusive metadata lock is held while updating the .frm, so ALTER TABLE is not completely online. This patch replaces "online" with "in-place", with additional comments indicating if concurrent reads are allowed during index creation/deletion or not. An important part of this update of terminology is renaming of the handler flags used by handlers to indicate if index creation/deletion can be done in-place and if concurrent reads are allowed. For example, the HA_ONLINE_ADD_INDEX_NO_WRITES flag has been renamed to HA_INPLACE_ADD_INDEX_NO_READ_WRITE, while HA_ONLINE_ADD_INDEX is now HA_INPLACE_ADD_INDEX_NO_WRITE. Note that this is a rename to clarify current behavior, the flag values have not changed and no flags have been removed or added. Test case added to innodb_mysql_sync.test.
-
Ramil Kalimullin authored
-
Ramil Kalimullin authored
-
Ramil Kalimullin authored
Fix backported from to 5.0. "Remove the alignment option, let valgrind use its default"
-
Alfranio Correia authored
-
Alfranio Correia authored
-
Libing Song authored
-
Libing Song authored
-
Libing Song authored
Updated the copyright.
-
- 25 Jan, 2011 6 commits
-
-
Bjorn Munch authored
-
Bjorn Munch authored
-
Bjorn Munch authored
-
Bjorn Munch authored
-
Bjorn Munch authored
-
Bjorn Munch authored
-
- 24 Jan, 2011 2 commits
-
-
Magnus Blåudd authored
-
- 21 Jan, 2011 2 commits
-
-
Bjorn Munch authored
-
Bjorn Munch authored
Race condition may occur: mtr sees the .expect file but it's empty Fix: wait and try again if file is empty Addendum: try again if line isn't 'wait' or 'restart' Also added verbose printout of extra restart options
-
- 20 Jan, 2011 1 commit
-
-
Martin Hansson authored
-
- 19 Jan, 2011 7 commits
-
-
Magnus Blåudd authored
-
Martin Hansson authored
ZERO When dates are represented internally as strings, i.e. when a string constant is compared to a date value, both values are converted to long integers, ostensibly for fast comparisons. DATE typed integer values are converted to DATETIME by multiplying by 1,000,000 (each digit pair representing hour, minute and second, respectively). But the mechanism did not distuinguish cached INTEGER values, already in correct format, from newly converted strings. Fixed by marking the INTEGER cache as being of DATETIME format.
-
Alexander Barkov authored
-
Bjorn Munch authored
-
Bjorn Munch authored
-
Bjorn Munch authored
-
Bjorn Munch authored
-
- 18 Jan, 2011 9 commits
-
-
Libing Song authored
-
Anitha Gopi authored
-
Anitha Gopi authored
-
Libing Song authored
-
Libing Song authored
rpl_packet got a timeout failure sporadically on PB when stopping slave. The real reason of this bug is that STOP SLAVE stopped IO thread first and then stopped SQL thread. It was possible that IO thread stopped after replicating part of a transaction which SQL thread was executing. SQL thread would be hung if the transaction could not be rolled back safely. After this patch, STOP SLAVE will stop SQL thread first and then stop IO thread, which guarantees that IO thread will fetch the reset of the events of the transaction that SQL thread is executing, so that SQL thread can finish the transaction if it cannot be rolled back safely. Added below auxiliary files to make the test code neater. restart_slave_sql.inc rpl_connection_master.inc rpl_connection_slave.inc rpl_connection_slave1.inc
-
John H. Embretsen authored
Fix for bug#45740 introduced test case using SHOW TABLE STATUS against a Memory table using latin1 character in table name. The test failed on Windows and FreeBSD due to a difference in the value for Avg_row_length. The average row length normally depends on the values for data length and row count. According to the 5.5 manual data length is approximate with Memory tables. With MyISAM and InnoDB the Avg_row_length is the same on Windows and Solaris. The solution implemented by this patch is to mask out the value for Avg_row_length, as it may vary when using Memory tables.
-
Bjorn Munch authored
-
Bjorn Munch authored
Undoing the patch, it complicates the code but is not the solution I do not beleive newline mismatch could be the cause of this failure First, I cannot see how this could be a problem, mtr ignores the newline when reading the expect file, and the file is written and read on Windows. Second, if this really was the problem it should have been deterministic: either the newline is correctly interepreted or it is not.
-
Bjorn Munch authored
-