1. 20 Jul, 2011 1 commit
  2. 19 Jul, 2011 8 commits
    • Sergey Petrunya's avatar
      BUG##806524: Assertion `join->best_read < 1.7976931348623157e+308 with... · b11eff40
      Sergey Petrunya authored
      BUG##806524: Assertion `join->best_read < 1.7976931348623157e+308 with table_elimination=on and derived_merge=on 
      reset_nj_counters() used to rely on the fact that join nests have 
      table->table==NULL. This ceased to be true wit new derived table
      optimizations. Use test for table->nested_join!=NULL instead.
      b11eff40
    • unknown's avatar
      Fixed LP BUG#800696. · 99cce189
      unknown authored
      The problem was that optimizer removes some outer references (it they are
      constant for example) and the list of outer items built during prepare phase is
      not actual during execution phase when we need it as the cache parameters.
      First solution was use pointer on pointer on outer reference Item and
      initialize temporary table on demand. This solved most problem except case
      when optimiser also reduce Item which contains outer references ('OR' in
      this bug test suite).
      
      The solution is to build the list of outer reference items on execution
      phase (after optimization) on demand (just before temporary table creation)
      by walking Item tree and finding outer references among Item_ident
      (Item_field/Item_ref) and Item_sum items.
      
      Removed depends_on list (because it is not neede any mnore for the cache, in the place where it was used it replaced with upper_refs).
      
      Added processor (collect_outer_ref_processor) and get_cache_parameters() methods to collect outer references (or other expression parameters in future).
      
      mysql-test/r/subselect_cache.result:
        A new test added.
      mysql-test/r/subselect_scache.result:
        Changes in creating the cache and its paremeters order or adding arguments of aggregate function (which is a parameter also, but this has no influence on the result).
      mysql-test/t/subselect_cache.test:
        Added a new test.
      sql/item.cc:
        depends_on removed.
        
        Added processor (collect_outer_ref_processor) and get_cache_parameters() methods to collect outer references.
        
        Item_cache_wrapper collect parameters befor initialization of its cache.
      sql/item.h:
        depends_on removed.
        
        Added processor (collect_outer_ref_processor) and get_cache_parameters() methods to collect outer references.
      sql/item_cmpfunc.cc:
        depends_on removed.
        
        Added processor (collect_outer_ref_processor) to collect outer references.
      sql/item_cmpfunc.h:
        Added processor (collect_outer_ref_processor) to collect outer references.
      sql/item_subselect.cc:
        depends_on removed.
        Added processor get_cache_parameters() method to collect outer references.
      sql/item_subselect.h:
        depends_on removed.
        Added processor get_cache_parameters() method to collect outer references.
      sql/item_sum.cc:
        Added processor (collect_outer_ref_processor) method to collect outer references.
      sql/item_sum.h:
        Added processor (collect_outer_ref_processor) and get_cache_parameters() methods to collect outer references.
      sql/opt_range.cc:
        depends_on removed.
      sql/sql_base.cc:
        depends_on removed.
      sql/sql_class.h:
        New iterator added.
      sql/sql_expression_cache.cc:
        Build of list of items resolved in outer query done just before creating expression cache on the first execution of the subquery which removes influence of optimizer removing items (all optimization already done).
      sql/sql_expression_cache.h:
        Build of list of items resolved in outer query done just before creating expression cache on the first execution of the subquery which removes influence of optimizer removing items (all optimization already done).
      sql/sql_lex.cc:
        depends_on removed.
      sql/sql_lex.h:
        depends_on removed.
      sql/sql_list.h:
        Added add_unique method to add only unique elements to the list.
      sql/sql_select.cc:
        Support of new Item list added.
      sql/sql_select.h:
        Support of new Item list added.
      99cce189
    • Sergey Petrunya's avatar
    • Sergey Petrunya's avatar
      Buildbot fixes: add --sorted-result · 775ac38d
      Sergey Petrunya authored
      775ac38d
    • Sergey Petrunya's avatar
      Merge · 265b51df
      Sergey Petrunya authored
      265b51df
    • Igor Babaev's avatar
      Merge. · cfc78964
      Igor Babaev authored
      cfc78964
    • Igor Babaev's avatar
      Merge. · fdad4063
      Igor Babaev authored
      fdad4063
    • Igor Babaev's avatar
      f392edab
  3. 18 Jul, 2011 2 commits
    • unknown's avatar
      Fix bug lp:782305 · c9e23682
      unknown authored
      Analysis:
      Both the wrong result and the valgrind warning were a result
      of incomplete cleanup of the MIN/MAX subquery rewrite. At the
      first execution of the query, the non-aggregate subquery is
      transformed into an aggregate MIN/MAX subquery. During the
      fix_fields phase of the MIN/MAX function, it sets the property
      st_select_lex::with_sum_func to true.
      
      The second execution of the query finds this flag to be ON.
      When optimization reaches the same MIN/MAX subquery
      transformation, it tests if the subquery is an aggregate or not.
      Since select_lex->with_sum_func == true from the previous
      execution, the transformation executes the second branch that
      handles aggregate subqueries. This substitutes the subquery
      Item into a Item_maxmin_subselect. At the same time elsewhere
      it is assumed that the subquery Item is of type
      Item_allany_subselect. Ultimately this results in casting the
      actual object to the wrong class, and calling the wrong
      any_value() method from empty_underlying_subquery().
      
      Solution:
      Cleanup the st_select_lex::with_sum_func property in the case
      when the MIN/MAX transformation was performed for a non-aggregate
      subquery, so that the transformation can be repeated.
      c9e23682
    • Igor Babaev's avatar
      Fixed LP bug #793448. · a7287d9a
      Igor Babaev authored
      This bug could lead to wrong result sets for a query over a
      materialized derived table or view accessed by a multi-component
      key.
      It happened because the function get_next_field_for_derived_key
      was supposed to update its argument, and it did not do it.
      a7287d9a
  4. 17 Jul, 2011 2 commits
    • Igor Babaev's avatar
      Merge with the latest 5.3 code. · cc0195d6
      Igor Babaev authored
      cc0195d6
    • Igor Babaev's avatar
      Fixed LP bug #794901. · d37465a9
      Igor Babaev authored
      Also:
      1. simplified the code of the function mysql_derived_merge_for_insert.
      2. moved merge of views/dt for multi-update/delete to the prepare stage.
      3. the list of the references to the candidates for semi-join now is
         allocated in the statement memory.
      d37465a9
  5. 15 Jul, 2011 4 commits
  6. 14 Jul, 2011 12 commits
    • Sergey Petrunya's avatar
      Merge · 0a12fa29
      Sergey Petrunya authored
      0a12fa29
    • Sergey Petrunya's avatar
      0aaae1e3
    • Sergey Petrunya's avatar
      Valgrind fix for the previous cset: · 08fa757a
      Sergey Petrunya authored
      - {ha_myisam,ha_maria}::index_read_idx_map should also initialize end_range, because index condition 
        function will attempt to check it. We initialize it like index_init() does.
      08fa757a
    • Sergey Petrunya's avatar
      BUG#803457: Wrong result with semijoin + view + outer join in maria-5.3-subqueries-mwl90 · 56a23357
      Sergey Petrunya authored
      (This is not a real fix for this bug, even though it makes it to no longer repeat)
      - Semi-join subquery predicates, i.e. ... WHERE outer_expr IN (SELECT ...) may have null-rejecting properties,
        may allow to convert outer joins into inner.
      - When convert_subq_to_sj() injected IN-equality into parent's WHERE/ON clause, it didn't call 
        $new_cond->top_level_item(), which would cause null-rejecting properties to be lost.
      - Fixed, now the mentioned outer-to-inner conversion will really take place.
      56a23357
    • unknown's avatar
      MWL#68 efficient partial matching · 445fcaa8
      unknown authored
      - Added an initial set of feature-specific test cases
      - Handled the special case where the materialized subquery of an
        IN predicates consists of only NULL values.
      - Fixed a bug where making Item_in_subselect a constant,
        didn't respect its null_value value.
      445fcaa8
    • Sergey Petrunya's avatar
      Merge · 932d5166
      Sergey Petrunya authored
      932d5166
    • Sergey Petrunya's avatar
      BUG#778434 Wrong result with in_to_exists=on in maria-5.3-mwl89 · 2a9c86be
      Sergey Petrunya authored
      - Make {ha_myisam,ha_maria}::index_read_idx_map check pushed index condition.
      - Address review feedback (added comments)
      2a9c86be
    • unknown's avatar
      Fix bug lp:777691 · 53681ee5
      unknown authored
      Analysis:
      
      For some of the re-executions of the correlated subquery the
      where clause is false. In these cases the execution of the
      subquery detects that it must generate a NULL row because of
      implicit grouping. In this case the subquery execution reaches
      the following code in do_select():
      
              while ((table= li++))
                mark_as_null_row(table->table);
      
      This code marks all rows in the table as complete NULL rows.
      In the example, when evaluating the field t2.f10 for the second
      row, all bits of Field::null_ptr[0] are set by the previous call
      to mark_as_null_row(). Then the call to Field::is_null()
      returns true, resulting in a NULL for the MAX function.
      
      Thus the lines above are not suitable for subquery re-execution
      because mark_as_null_row() changes the NULL bits of each table
      field, and there is no logic to restore these fields.
      
      Solution:
      
      The call to mark_as_null_row() was added by the fix for bug
      lp:613029. Therefore removing the fix for lp:613029 corrects
      this wrong result. At the same time the test for lp:613029
      behaves correctly because the changes of MWL#89 result in a
      different execution path where:
      - the constant subquery is evaluated via JOIN::exec_const_cond
      - detecting that it has an empty result triggers the branch
        if (zero_result_cause)
          return_zero_rows()
      - return_zero_rows() calls mark_as_null_row().
      
      53681ee5
    • unknown's avatar
      Automatic merge. · c4097382
      unknown authored
      c4097382
    • Igor Babaev's avatar
      Merge. · b1a177e4
      Igor Babaev authored
      b1a177e4
    • Igor Babaev's avatar
      Fixed LP bug #809179. · ff9c406c
      Igor Babaev authored
      The attribute not_null_tables could be calculated incorrectly in the
      function SELECT_LEX::update_used_tables for queries over views 
      with row items in the WHERE clause. It happened because no 
      implementation of the virtual callback function eval_not_null_tables
      was provided for the class Item_row.
      Also slightly optimized the code calculating the value of the maybe_null
      flag for tables in the function SELECT_LEX::update_used_tables.
      ff9c406c
    • Igor Babaev's avatar
  7. 13 Jul, 2011 8 commits
    • Sergey Petrunya's avatar
    • unknown's avatar
      Fix bug lp:809266 · 1e6bd6b4
      unknown authored
      Analysis:
      This is a bug in MWL#68, where it was incorrectly assumed
      that if there is a match in the only non-null key, then
      if there is a covering NULL row on all remaining NULL-able
      columns there is a partial match. However, this is not the case,
      because even if there is such a null-only sub-row, it is not
      guaranteed to be part of the matched sub-row. The matched sub-row
      and the NULL-only sub-row may be parts of different rows.
      
      In fact there are two cases:
      - there is a complete row with only NULL values, and
      - all nullable columns contain only NULL values.
      
      These two cases were incorrectly mixed up in the class member
        subselect_partial_match_engine::covering_null_row_width.
      
      
      Solution:
      The solution is to:
      - split covering_null_row_width into two members:
        has_covering_null_row, and has_covering_null_columns, and
      - take into account each state during initialization and
        execution.
      1e6bd6b4
    • Igor Babaev's avatar
      Merge. · 7c46dc52
      Igor Babaev authored
      7c46dc52
    • Igor Babaev's avatar
      Corrected the code of the recent patch that had changed the base · 102fb4e0
      Igor Babaev authored
      class for Item_func_xor. Added the implementation of the
      subst_argument_checker virtual method that the objects of this 
      class used to use before the patch.
      Reverted the previous result changes in sunselect_sj and
      subselect_sj_jcl6.
        
      102fb4e0
    • unknown's avatar
      Merged the fix for bug lp:608744 · 61eb3423
      unknown authored
      61eb3423
    • unknown's avatar
      Fixed bug lp:809245 · 990584d7
      unknown authored
      In addition to the bug fix explained below, the patch performs
      few renames, and adds some comments to avoid similar problems.
      
      Analysis:
      The failed assert was due to a bug in MWL#68, where it was
      incorrectly assumed that the size of the bitmap
      subselect_rowid_merge_engine::null_only_columns should be
      the same as the size of the array of Ordered_keys.
      
      The bitmap null_only_columns contains bits to mark columns
      that contain only NULLs. Therefore the indexes of the bits
      to be set in null_only_columns are different from the indexes
      of the Ordered_keys. If there is a NULL-only column that appears
      in a table after the last partial match column with Ordered_key,
      this NULL-only column would require setting a bit with index
      bigger than the size of the bitmap null_only_columns.
      
      Accessing such a bit caused the failed assert.
      
      Solution:
      Upon analysis, it turns out that null_only_columns is not needed
      at all, because we are looking for partial matches, and having
      such columns guarantees that there is a partial match for any
      corresponding outer value.
      
      Therefore the patch removes
        subselect_rowid_merge_engine::null_only_columns.
      990584d7
    • Sergey Petrunya's avatar
      Update test results for previous cset · bf284498
      Sergey Petrunya authored
      bf284498
    • Igor Babaev's avatar
      Fixed LP bug #809206. · 5819dfcd
      Igor Babaev authored
      The bitmap of used tables must be evaluated for the select list of every
      materialized derived table / view and saved in a dedicated field.
      This is also applied to materialized subqueries.
      5819dfcd
  8. 12 Jul, 2011 1 commit
  9. 11 Jul, 2011 2 commits
    • Igor Babaev's avatar
      Merge with the latest 5.3 code. · 6e541385
      Igor Babaev authored
      6e541385
    • Sergey Petrunya's avatar
      Port of code for: (part of testcase is in mysql-test/t/subquery*.test and will... · 2c28412e
      Sergey Petrunya authored
      Port of code for: (part of testcase is in mysql-test/t/subquery*.test and will be ported separately)
      
      Bug#11766642: crash in Item_field::register_field_in_read_map 
                    with view
      
      (Former 59793)
      
      Prior to the refactoring in this patch, Item_cond_xor behaved 
      partially as an Item_cond and partially as an Item_func. The
      reasoning behind this was that XOR is currently not optimized
      (thus should be Item_func instead of Item_cond), but it was 
      planned optimize it in the future (thus, made Item_cond anyway 
      to ease optimization later). 
      
      Even though Item_cond inherits from Item_func, there are 
      differences between these two. One difference is that the 
      arguments are stored differently. Item_cond stores them in a 
      list while Item_func store them in an args[]. 
      
      BUG no 45221 was caused by Item_cond_xor storing arguments in 
      the list while users of the objects would look for them in 
      args[]. The fix back then was to store the arguments in both 
      locations.
      
      In this bug, Item_cond_xor initially gets two Item_field 
      arguments. These are stored in the list inherited from 
      Item_cond and in args[] inherited from Item_func. During
      resolution, find_field_in_view() replaces the Item_fields 
      stored in the list with Item_direct_view_refs, but args[] 
      still points to the unresolved Item_fields. This shows that 
      the fix for 45221 was incorrect.
      
      The refactoring performed in this patch removes the confusion
      by making the XOR item an Item_func period. A neg_transformer() 
      is also implemented for Item_func_xor to improve performance 
      when negating XOR expressions. An XOR is negated by negating 
      one of the operands.
      2c28412e