- 24 Mar, 2007 2 commits
-
-
* Modified Federated memory allocation to use MEM_ROOT * Modified sql_servers and federated to allocate share connection parameters to use MEM_ROOT * Modified Federated to allow tablename in addition to server name * Implicit flushing of tables using altered/dropped server name * Added tests to prove new functionality works Contributors to this patch: Patrick Galbraith, Antony Curtis
-
"Concurrent ALTER/CREATE SERVER can lead to deadlock" Deadlock caused by inconsistant use of mutexes in sql_server.cc One mutex has been removed to resolve deadlock. Many functions were made private which should not be exported. Unused variables and function removed.
-
- 23 Mar, 2007 2 commits
-
-
istruewing@chilla.local authored
into chilla.local:/home/mydev/mysql-5.1-bug26782
-
istruewing@chilla.local authored
After merge fix In conjunction with the newest 5.1 we always need to create a real path name to be able to detect already open tables.
-
- 22 Mar, 2007 2 commits
-
-
istruewing@chilla.local authored
-
istruewing@chilla.local authored
into chilla.local:/home/mydev/mysql-5.1-bug26996
-
- 21 Mar, 2007 4 commits
-
-
istruewing@chilla.local authored
into chilla.local:/home/mydev/mysql-5.1-bug26996
-
istruewing@chilla.local authored
into chilla.local:/home/mydev/mysql-5.0-bug26996
-
svoj@june.mysql.com authored
into mysql.com:/home/svoj/devel/mysql/BUG25908/mysql-5.1-engines
-
svoj@mysql.com/june.mysql.com authored
Opening certain tables that have different definitions in .MYI and .frm may result in a server crash. Compare .MYI and .frm definition when myisam table is opened. In case definitions are diffirent refuse to open such table. No test case, since it requires broken table.
-
- 19 Mar, 2007 1 commit
-
-
istruewing@chilla.local authored
Using a MEMORY table BTREE index for scanning for updatable rows could lead to an infinite loop. Everytime a key was inserted into a btree index, the position in the index scan was cleared. The search started from the beginning and found the same key again. Now we do not clear the position on key insert an more.
-
- 16 Mar, 2007 2 commits
-
-
istruewing@chilla.local authored
into chilla.local:/home/mydev/mysql-5.1-bug26782
-
istruewing@blade08.mysql.com authored
into blade08.mysql.com:/data0/istruewing/autopush/mysql-5.1-bug25289
-
- 15 Mar, 2007 8 commits
-
-
acurtis/antony@ltamd64.xiphis.org authored
into xiphis.org:/home/antony/work2/p1-bug25671.4
-
istruewing@chilla.local authored
into chilla.local:/home/mydev/mysql-5.1-bug25289
-
istruewing@chilla.local authored
into chilla.local:/home/mydev/mysql-5.0-bug25289
-
dlenev@mockturtle.local authored
into mockturtle.local:/home/dlenev/src/mysql-5.1-bg25966
-
dlenev@mockturtle.local authored
into mockturtle.local:/home/dlenev/src/mysql-5.0-bg25966-2
-
dlenev@mockturtle.local authored
TABLE ... WRITE". Memory and CPU hogging occured when connection which had to wait for table lock was serviced by thread which previously serviced connection that was killed (note that connections can reuse threads if thread cache is enabled). One possible scenario which exposed this problem was when thread which provided binlog dump to replication slave was implicitly/automatically killed when the same slave reconnected and started pulling data through different thread/connection. The problem also occured when one killed particular query in connection (using KILL QUERY) and later this connection had to wait for some table lock. This problem was caused by the fact that thread-specific mysys_var::abort variable, which indicates that waiting operations on mysys layer should be aborted (this includes waiting for table locks), was set by kill operation but was never reset back. So this value was "inherited" by the following statements or even other connections (which reused the same physical thread). Such discrepancy between this variable and THD::killed flag broke logic on SQL-layer and caused CPU and memory hogging. This patch tries to fix this problem by properly resetting this member. There is no test-case associated with this patch since it is hard to test for memory/CPU hogging conditions in our test-suite.
-
dlenev@mockturtle.local authored
TABLE ... WRITE". CPU hogging occured when connection which had to wait for table lock was serviced by thread which previously serviced connection that was killed (note that connections can reuse threads if thread cache is enabled). One possible scenario which exposed this problem was when thread which provided binlog dump to replication slave was implicitly/automatically killed when the same slave reconnected and started pulling data through different thread/connection. In 5.* versions memory hogging was added to CPU hogging. Moreover in those versions the problem also occured when one killed particular query in connection (using KILL QUERY) and later this connection had to wait for some table lock. This problem was caused by the fact that thread-specific mysys_var::abort variable, which indicates that waiting operations on mysys layer should be aborted (this includes waiting for table locks), was set by kill operation but was never reset back. So this value was "inherited" by the following statements or even other connections (which reused the same physical thread). Such discrepancy between this variable and THD::killed flag broke logic on SQL-layer and caused CPU and memory hogging. This patch tries to fix this problem by properly resetting this member. There is no test-case associated with this patch since it is hard to test for memory/CPU hogging conditions in our test-suite.
-
dlenev@mockturtle.local authored
into mockturtle.local:/home/dlenev/src/mysql-5.1-bg25966
-
- 14 Mar, 2007 14 commits
-
-
kent@kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-5.1-build
-
kent@mysql.com/kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-5.0-build
-
kent@mysql.com/kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-4.1-build
-
kent@mysql.com/kent-amd64.(none) authored
Updated to version 0.6 of the text
-
istruewing@chilla.local authored
my_seek: Assertion `fd != -1' failed" In difficult optimize/repair situations the server could crash. Under some circumstances the server retries an optimize/repair with more elaborate options. But it did not check if the first attempt failed so badly that a second one must not be tried. This could happen when a new data file has been created but it was not possible to open it. In this case the repair leaves behind a table with closed data file. This must not be used for another repair attempt. We do now detect the closed data file and do not try another repair attempt in this situation. No test case. The required table corruption can not be repeated easily. There is a test program attached to bug 25433.
-
kent@kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-5.1-build
-
kent@kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-5.1-build
-
kent@mysql.com/kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-5.0-build
-
kent@mysql.com/kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-5.0-build
-
kent@mysql.com/kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-4.1-build
-
kent@mysql.com/kent-amd64.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/kent/bk/tmp/mysql-4.1-build
-
kent@mysql.com/kent-amd64.(none) authored
Added test for sched_yield() possibly in -lposix4 on Solaris
-
istruewing@blade08.mysql.com authored
into blade08.mysql.com:/data0/istruewing/autopush/mysql-5.1-bug25460
-
svoj@april.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/svoj/devel/mysql/BUG26881/mysql-5.1-engines
-
- 13 Mar, 2007 5 commits
-
-
svoj@mysql.com/april.(none) authored
-
"CREATE/DROP/ALTER SERVER should require privileges" Add check for SUPER privilege when executing CREATE/DROP/ALTER SERVER. Previously, any user even with only USAGE priv can execute those commands.
-
istruewing@blade08.mysql.com authored
into blade08.mysql.com:/data0/istruewing/autopush/mysql-5.1-bug25460
-
istruewing@chilla.local authored
The previous two patches for this bug worked together so that no permanent table was memory mapped. The first patch tried to avoid mapping while a table is in use. It allowed mapping only if there was exactly one lock on the table, assuming that the calling thread owned it. During mi_open(), a different call to memory mapping was coded, which did not have this limitation. The second patch tried to remove the code duplication and just called mi_extra() from mi_open() an thus inherited the limitation. But on open, a thread does not have a lock on the table... A possible solution would be to check for zero or one lock. But since I learned that it is safe to memory map a file while normal file I/O is done on it, I removed the restriction altogether and allow to memory map while a table is in use. No test case. I do not see a chance to verify with the test suite which kind of I/O is used on a table.
-
svoj@april.(none) authored
into mysql.com:/home/svoj/devel/mysql/BUG26881/mysql-5.1-engines
-