Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
erp5
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
CI / CD
CI / CD
Pipelines
Jobs
Schedules
Analytics
Analytics
CI / CD
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Jobs
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Laurent S
erp5
Commits
d958b1a1
Commit
d958b1a1
authored
Feb 04, 2014
by
Julien Muchembled
Committed by
Sebastien Robin
Feb 17, 2015
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
MRP: add compatibility code for unit tests that wrongly use 'industrial_phase'
parent
e008fa3a
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
6 additions
and
1 deletion
+6
-1
product/ERP5/Document/Amount.py
product/ERP5/Document/Amount.py
+6
-1
No files found.
product/ERP5/Document/Amount.py
View file @
d958b1a1
...
...
@@ -91,7 +91,12 @@ class Amount(Base, VariatedMixin):
return
[]
variation_list
=
resource
.
getVariationBaseCategoryList
(
omit_optional_variation
=
omit_optional_variation
)
variation_list
.
append
(
'industrial_phase'
)
# BBB: 'industrial_phase' should be used exclusively for production and
# should not appear on resource. But many unit tests still use it.
# For the same reason, we treat as an optional variation.
if
(
'industrial_phase'
not
in
variation_list
and
not
omit_optional_variation
):
variation_list
.
append
(
'industrial_phase'
)
if
base_category_list
:
variation_list
=
filter
(
base_category_list
.
__contains__
,
variation_list
)
return
self
.
getAcquiredCategoryMembershipList
(
variation_list
,
base
=
1
)
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment