- 19 Apr, 2017 3 commits
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
- 18 Apr, 2017 4 commits
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
name old time/op new time/op delta IndexLoad-4 2.49ms ± 1% 2.18ms ± 3% -12.39% (p=0.000 n=9+10) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta IndexLoad-4 3.77MB ± 0% 3.49MB ± 0% -7.50% (p=0.000 n=8+9) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta IndexLoad-4 1.98k ± 0% 0.53k ± 0% -72.96% (p=0.000 n=10+10)
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
Code generated for copy(posb[2:], posBuf[i*6:]) pos := int64(binary.BigEndian.Uint64(posb[:])) was awful. name old time/op new time/op delta IndexLoad-4 3.06ms ± 0% 2.49ms ± 1% -18.71% (p=0.000 n=9+10)
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
- 07 Apr, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
- 06 Apr, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
- 05 Apr, 2017 7 commits
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
- 04 Apr, 2017 5 commits
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
- 29 Mar, 2017 1 commit
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
- 28 Mar, 2017 7 commits
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
looks like slice modification inside loop is not well optimized yet. name old time/op new time/op delta PyQuote-4 894ns ± 0% 861ns ± 0% -3.78% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
name old time/op new time/op delta PyQuote-4 950ns ± 0% 894ns ± 0% -5.89% (p=0.008 n=5+5) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta PyQuote-4 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta PyQuote-4 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal)
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
name old time/op new time/op delta PyQuote-4 976ns ± 0% 950ns ± 0% -2.64% (p=0.008 n=5+5) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta PyQuote-4 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta PyQuote-4 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal)
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
it is annoying to see this function high in fstail profiles taking up to 10% name old time/op new time/op delta PyQuote-4 1.33µs ± 1% 0.98µs ± 0% -26.77% (p=0.008 n=5+5) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta PyQuote-4 0.00B 0.00B ~ (all equal) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta PyQuote-4 0.00 0.00 ~ (all equal)
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
- 27 Mar, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
name old time/op new time/op delta FsTail-4 166µs ± 0% 107µs ± 1% -35.54% (p=0.008 n=5+5) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta FsTail-4 28.1kB ± 0% 12.6kB ± 0% -54.95% (p=0.008 n=5+5) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta FsTail-4 671 ± 0% 78 ± 0% -88.38% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
- 25 Mar, 2017 4 commits
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
- 24 Mar, 2017 3 commits
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
on non testdata/1.fs name old time/op new time/op delta ZodbDump-4 313ms ± 1% 98ms ± 0% -68.81% (p=0.008 n=5+5) name old alloc/op new alloc/op delta ZodbDump-4 75.0MB ± 0% 0.1MB ± 0% -99.89% (p=0.008 n=5+5) name old allocs/op new allocs/op delta ZodbDump-4 2.16M ± 0% 0.00M ± 0% -99.91% (p=0.008 n=5+5)
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
- 23 Mar, 2017 2 commits
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
-