Commits · a2f192cbe105e4693166a177950fadddd9b66eff · Levin Zimmermann / neoppod

09 Dec, 2020 6 commits

. · a2f192cb
Kirill Smelkov authored Dec 09, 2020

a2f192cb
. · f69b3c48
Kirill Smelkov authored Dec 09, 2020

f69b3c48
X Adjust NEO/go to neo:// URL change + py fixups · 8c974485
Kirill Smelkov authored Dec 09, 2020

8c974485

Y client: Fix URI scheme to move credentials out of query · b9a42957

Kirill Smelkov authored Dec 09, 2020

- Move ca/cert/key out of query part into credentials part of URL
- As a consequence move cluster name out of credentials part into path part
- Allow both neo:// and neos:// schemes to be used.
  neo:// means alwasy without SSL and neos:// means always with SSL.
  Even if neos:// URL comes without credentials embedded into it - they
  can be obtained from elsewhere.

I need this change in wendelin.core 2 which needs to take a zurl and
compute a mountpoint patch that corresponds to it, so that multiple
several zopes that use the same NEO storage, could be associated with
the same single WCFS instance.

b9a42957

X Refine neo:// URL schem · 46a7c9e6
Kirill Smelkov authored Dec 09, 2020
```
See next patch.
```
46a7c9e6

X go/neo: Only accept TLS >= 1.2 · cf6fc795

Kirill Smelkov authored Dec 09, 2020

Tighten up security. NEO/py does something similar:

https://lab.nexedi.com/nexedi/neoppod/blob/v1.12-61-gc1c26894/neo/lib/app.py#L76-78

On CPython 2.7.18:

    In [7]: list((k for k in dir(ssl) if k.startswith("PROTOCOL_TLSv")))
    Out[7]: ['PROTOCOL_TLSv1', 'PROTOCOL_TLSv1_1', 'PROTOCOL_TLSv1_2']

cf6fc795

08 Dec, 2020 1 commit
- X go/neo: Add SSL support · 573514c6
  Kirill Smelkov authored Dec 08, 2020
  
  573514c6
30 Nov, 2020 1 commit
- X nxdtest changed signature of summaryf to also accept stderr · cc4854b9
  Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 30, 2020
```
nexedi/nxdtest@53064e71
```
  cc4854b9
27 Nov, 2020 1 commit
- X verify that watching works with empty transactions · 433b11d9
  Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 27, 2020
```
It was not the case with ZEO4 server because we did not had
ZEO@bf80d23d yet.
```
  433b11d9
15 Nov, 2020 1 commit
- . · 0af40e12
  Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 15, 2020
  
  0af40e12
05 Nov, 2020 9 commits

Merge branch 'master' into t · fa502603

Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 05, 2020

* master:
  go/zodb/zeo: Correctly prefix zLink-related errors with operational context
  go/{zeo,neo}: handshake: Report "unexpected EOF" if peer sends only partial data
  go/{zeo,neo}: Don't tolerate if a packet reads only partially
  go/zodb/fs1: Factor-out noEOF and okEOF into common place (-> internal/xio)

fa502603

go/zodb/zeo: Correctly prefix zLink-related errors with operational context · 00ace0e8

Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 05, 2020

Go through zrpc and add error context to every function that can create
error. This is similar to what NEO does in neonet. The reason to do this
was the following obscure error from wcfs:

E1105 11:32:33.295497 24639 wcfs.go:2505] zwatch zeo://:28359: EOF

which, after this patch, is now

E1105 12:53:15.922052 30731 wcfs.go:2510] zwatch zeo://:27024: zlink 127.0.0.1:47768 - 127.0.0.1:27024: recvPkt: EOF

00ace0e8

go/{zeo,neo}: handshake: Report "unexpected EOF" if peer sends only partial data · 4d781f60
Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 05, 2020
```
NEO was already doing this, but let's use xio.NoEOF everywhere for
uniformity.
```
4d781f60
go/{zeo,neo}: Don't tolerate if a packet reads only partially · 72aea8ce
Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 05, 2020
```
If remote peer closes the link half-way of packet data - turn EOF into
ErrUnexpectedEOF.
```
72aea8ce
go/zodb/fs1: Factor-out noEOF and okEOF into common place (-> internal/xio) · 2babcd59
Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 05, 2020
```
We will need to use those utilities for ZEO and NEO.
```
2babcd59

go/zodb/zeo: Correctly prefix zLink-related errors with operational context · 2d12ae8c

Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 05, 2020

Go through zrpc and add error context to every function that can create
error. This is similar to what NEO does in neonet. The reason to do this
was the following obscure error from wcfs:

E1105 11:32:33.295497 24639 wcfs.go:2505] zwatch zeo://:28359: EOF

which, after this patch, is now

E1105 12:53:15.922052 30731 wcfs.go:2510] zwatch zeo://:27024: zlink 127.0.0.1:47768 - 127.0.0.1:27024: recvPkt: EOF

2d12ae8c

go/{zeo,neo}: handshake: Report "unexpected EOF" if peer sends only partial data · de9f6f64
Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 05, 2020
```
NEO was already doing this, but let's use xio.NoEOF everywhere for
uniformity.
```
de9f6f64
go/{zeo,neo}: Don't tolerate if a packet reads only partially · 1986a126
Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 05, 2020
```
If remote peer closes the link half-way of packet data - turn EOF into
ErrUnexpectedEOF.
```
1986a126
go/zodb/fs1: Factor-out noEOF and okEOF into common place (-> internal/xio) · b664d749
Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 05, 2020
```
We will need to use those utilities for ZEO and NEO.
```
b664d749

04 Nov, 2020 10 commits

Merge branch 'master' into t · 58689cb6

Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 04, 2020

* master:
  go/neo/neonet: Increase signal/noise in dump of packets with decode problems
  fixup! go/neo/proto: Switch enum encoding from int32 to int8
  go/zodb/zeo: Load: loadBefore RPC can return None to indicate non-existing object
  go/internal/xtesting: DrvTestLoad: Verify load of non-existing and not-yet-created objects

58689cb6

go/neo/neonet: Increase signal/noise in dump of packets with decode problems · 774f12c3

Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 04, 2020

We recently hit "decode: buffer overflow" errors due to mismatch in
between NEO/go and NEO/py (see previous patch). With dumpio=true that
problem was showing itself as

    127.0.0.1:50624 > 127.0.0.1:41863: .5 GetObject &{0000000000000000 ffffffffffffffff 0285cbac258bf266}
    127.0.0.1:50624 < 127.0.0.1:41863: .5 (proto.Error) decode: buffer overflow; #24 [24]: 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 10 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Error ACK ;  [24]tail: 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 10 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac258bf265:0000000000000000: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:24078: load 0285cbac258bf265:0000000000000000: 127.0.0.1:50624 - 127.0.0.1:41863 .5: decode: decode: buffer overflow
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:24078: load 0285cbac258bf265:0000000000000000: 0000000000000000: object was not yet created

Here after printing error and dumping all bytes from packet payload, it
was printing again message type, message value from to-be-decoded place
(which is zero-initialized) and data bytes again.
-> Fix it not to print anything after dump of payload data:

    127.0.0.1:60518 > 127.0.0.1:46719: .5 GetObject &{0000000000000000 ffffffffffffffff 0285cbac258bf266}
    127.0.0.1:60518 < 127.0.0.1:46719: .5 (Error) decode: buffer overflow; #24 [24]: 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 10 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac258bf265:0000000000000000: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:27853: load 0285cbac258bf265:0000000000000000: 127.0.0.1:60518 - 127.0.0.1:46719 .5: decode: decode: buffer overflow
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:27853: load 0285cbac258bf265:0000000000000000: 0000000000000000: object was not yet created

774f12c3

fixup! go/neo/proto: Switch enum encoding from int32 to int8 · 05463172

Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 04, 2020

In commit 5f13cc85 I changed enum encodings from int32 to int8, but did
not noticed that NEO/py commit 52db5607 ("protocol: a single byte is
more than enough to encode enums") despite specified intent and
ErrorCodes being marked with @Enum, changed encoding only for fields
that are marked as PEnum in structures. In NEO/py the Error.code field
is still marked as PNumber which encodes as 32-bit integer on the wire.
-> Fix it back.

With recent xtesting.DrvTestLoad update this error was manifesting itself as (on @t branch):

--- FAIL: TestLoad (2.08s)
    --- FAIL: TestLoad/py (2.07s)
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac258bf265:0000000000000000: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac258bf265:0000000000000000: 127.0.0.1:42288 - 127.0.0.1:37109 .5: decode: decode: buffer overflow
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac258bf265:0000000000000000: 0000000000000000: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac3d0369e5:0000000000000001: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac3d0369e5:0000000000000001: 127.0.0.1:42288 - 127.0.0.1:37109 .13: decode: decode: buffer overflow
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac3d0369e5:0000000000000001: 0000000000000001: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac41b4e832:0000000000000002: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac41b4e832:0000000000000002: 127.0.0.1:42288 - 127.0.0.1:37109 .21: decode: decode: buffer overflow
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac41b4e832:0000000000000002: 0000000000000002: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac4666667f:0000000000000003: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac4666667f:0000000000000003: 127.0.0.1:42288 - 127.0.0.1:37109 .29: decode: decode: buffer overflow
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac4666667f:0000000000000003: 0000000000000003: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac4fc96318:0000000000000004: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac4fc96318:0000000000000004: 127.0.0.1:42288 - 127.0.0.1:37109 .41: decode: decode: buffer overflow
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac4fc96318:0000000000000004: 0000000000000004: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac547ae165:0000000000000005: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac547ae165:0000000000000005: 127.0.0.1:42288 - 127.0.0.1:37109 .49: decode: decode: buffer overflow
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac547ae165:0000000000000005: 0000000000000005: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac628f5c4b:0000000000000006: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac628f5c4b:0000000000000006: 127.0.0.1:42288 - 127.0.0.1:37109 .65: decode: decode: buffer overflow
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac628f5c4b:0000000000000006: 0000000000000006: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbaca444447f:0000000000000007: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbaca444447f:0000000000000007: 127.0.0.1:42288 - 127.0.0.1:37109 .125: decode: decode: buffer overflow
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbaca444447f:0000000000000007: 0000000000000007: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbacbbbbbbff:0000000000000008: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbacbbbbbbff:0000000000000008: 127.0.0.1:42288 - 127.0.0.1:37109 .149: decode: decode: buffer overflow
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbacbbbbbbff:0000000000000008: 0000000000000008: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbad80da7498:0000000000000009: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbad80da7498:0000000000000009: 127.0.0.1:42288 - 127.0.0.1:37109 .269: decode: decode: buffer overflow
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbad80da7498:0000000000000009: 0000000000000009: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:331: load 7fffffffffffffff:000000000000000a: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 7fffffffffffffff:000000000000000a: 127.0.0.1:42288 - 127.0.0.1:37109 .295: decode: decode: buffer overflow
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 7fffffffffffffff:000000000000000a: 000000000000000a: no such object

05463172

go/zodb/zeo: Load: loadBefore RPC can return None to indicate non-existing object · f8696942

Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 04, 2020

Before this patch and with updated DrvTestLoad (see previous patch) it was failing as:

--- FAIL: TestLoad (0.52s)
--- FAIL: TestLoad/py/msgpack=false (0.25s)
xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac258bf265:0000000000000000: returned err unexpected:
have: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac258bf265:0000000000000000: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: call loadBefore: unexpected reply: got ogórek.None{}; expect 3-tuple
want: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac258bf265:0000000000000000: 0000000000000000: no such object
xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac3d0369e5:0000000000000001: returned err unexpected:
have: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac3d0369e5:0000000000000001: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: call loadBefore: unexpected reply: got ogórek.None{}; expect 3-tuple
want: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac3d0369e5:0000000000000001: 0000000000000001: no such object
xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac41b4e832:0000000000000002: returned err unexpected:
have: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac41b4e832:0000000000000002: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: call loadBefore: unexpected reply: got ogórek.None{}; expect 3-tuple
want: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac41b4e832:0000000000000002: 0000000000000002: no such object
xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac4666667f:0000000000000003: returned err unexpected:
have: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac4666667f:0000000000000003: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: call loadBefore: unexpected reply: got ogórek.None{}; expect 3-tuple
want: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac4666667f:0000000000000003: 0000000000000003: no such object
xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac4fc96318:0000000000000004: returned err unexpected:
have: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac4fc96318:0000000000000004: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: call loadBefore: unexpected reply: got ogórek.None{}; expect 3-tuple
want: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac4fc96318:0000000000000004: 0000000000000004: no such object
xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac547ae165:0000000000000005: returned err unexpected:
have: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac547ae165:0000000000000005: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: call loadBefore: unexpected reply: got ogórek.None{}; expect 3-tuple
want: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac547ae165:0000000000000005: 0000000000000005: no such object
xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac628f5c4b:0000000000000006: returned err unexpected:
have: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac628f5c4b:0000000000000006: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: call loadBefore: unexpected reply: got ogórek.None{}; expect 3-tuple
want: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac628f5c4b:0000000000000006: 0000000000000006: no such object
xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbaca444447f:0000000000000007: returned err unexpected:
have: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbaca444447f:0000000000000007: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: call loadBefore: unexpected reply: got ogórek.None{}; expect 3-tuple
want: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbaca444447f:0000000000000007: 0000000000000007: no such object
xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbacbbbbbbff:0000000000000008: returned err unexpected:
have: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbacbbbbbbff:0000000000000008: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: call loadBefore: unexpected reply: got ogórek.None{}; expect 3-tuple
want: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbacbbbbbbff:0000000000000008: 0000000000000008: no such object
xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbad80da7498:0000000000000009: returned err unexpected:
have: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbad80da7498:0000000000000009: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: call loadBefore: unexpected reply: got ogórek.None{}; expect 3-tuple
want: /tmp/zeo535364855/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbad80da7498:0000000000000009: 0000000000000009: no such object
--- FAIL: TestLoad/py/msgpack=true (0.26s)
xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac258bf265:0000000000000000: returned err unexpected:
have: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac258bf265:0000000000000000: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: call loadBefore: zlink is closed
want: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac258bf265:0000000000000000: 0000000000000000: no such object
xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac3d0369e5:0000000000000001: returned err unexpected:
have: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac3d0369e5:0000000000000001: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: call loadBefore: zlink is closed
want: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac3d0369e5:0000000000000001: 0000000000000001: no such object
xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac41b4e832:0000000000000002: returned err unexpected:
have: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac41b4e832:0000000000000002: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: call loadBefore: zlink is closed
want: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac41b4e832:0000000000000002: 0000000000000002: no such object
xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac4666667f:0000000000000003: returned err unexpected:
have: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac4666667f:0000000000000003: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: call loadBefore: zlink is closed
want: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac4666667f:0000000000000003: 0000000000000003: no such object
xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac4fc96318:0000000000000004: returned err unexpected:
have: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac4fc96318:0000000000000004: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: call loadBefore: zlink is closed
want: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac4fc96318:0000000000000004: 0000000000000004: no such object
xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac547ae165:0000000000000005: returned err unexpected:
have: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac547ae165:0000000000000005: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: call loadBefore: zlink is closed
want: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac547ae165:0000000000000005: 0000000000000005: no such object
xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac628f5c4b:0000000000000006: returned err unexpected:
have: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac628f5c4b:0000000000000006: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: call loadBefore: zlink is closed
want: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbac628f5c4b:0000000000000006: 0000000000000006: no such object
xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbaca444447f:0000000000000007: returned err unexpected:
have: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbaca444447f:0000000000000007: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: call loadBefore: zlink is closed
want: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbaca444447f:0000000000000007: 0000000000000007: no such object
xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbacbbbbbbff:0000000000000008: returned err unexpected:
have: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbacbbbbbbff:0000000000000008: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: call loadBefore: zlink is closed
want: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbacbbbbbbff:0000000000000008: 0000000000000008: no such object
xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbad80da7498:0000000000000009: returned err unexpected:
have: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbad80da7498:0000000000000009: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: call loadBefore: zlink is closed
want: /tmp/zeo794664426/1.fs.zeosock: load 0285cbad80da7498:0000000000000009: 0000000000000009: no such object

f8696942

go/internal/xtesting: DrvTestLoad: Verify load of non-existing and not-yet-created objects · 4acadb94
Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 04, 2020
```
This currently fails on ZEO and NEO. Those storages will be fixed in the
following patches (NEO only on @t branch for now).
```
4acadb94

go/neo/proto: Don't require deletedAt to be present in OID_NOT_FOUND · a2b8516c

Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 04, 2020

Providing deletedAt in addition to oid in OID_NOT_FOUND error is NEO/go extension.
NEO/py sends only OidNotFound(oid):

https://lab.nexedi.com/nexedi/neoppod/blob/v1.12-0-g6332112c/neo/storage/handlers/client.py#L70-72

-> decode deletedAt only if it is present.

Since inspecting NEO/py codebase turned out that message always comes
with oid, remove the "abusing" words about this approach to convey oid
via error message for OID_NOT_FOUND and OID_DOES_NOT_EXIST.

Without this patch TestLoad was failing as

    === RUN   TestLoad/py
    I: runneo.py: /tmp/neo124851059/1: started master(s): 127.0.0.1:19681
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac258bf265:0000000000000000: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:19681: load 0285cbac258bf265:0000000000000000: OID_NOT_FOUND: 0000000000000000
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:19681: load 0285cbac258bf265:0000000000000000: 0000000000000000: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac3d0369e5:0000000000000001: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:19681: load 0285cbac3d0369e5:0000000000000001: OID_NOT_FOUND: 0000000000000001
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:19681: load 0285cbac3d0369e5:0000000000000001: 0000000000000001: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac41b4e832:0000000000000002: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:19681: load 0285cbac41b4e832:0000000000000002: OID_NOT_FOUND: 0000000000000002
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:19681: load 0285cbac41b4e832:0000000000000002: 0000000000000002: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac4666667f:0000000000000003: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:19681: load 0285cbac4666667f:0000000000000003: OID_NOT_FOUND: 0000000000000003
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:19681: load 0285cbac4666667f:0000000000000003: 0000000000000003: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac4fc96318:0000000000000004: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:19681: load 0285cbac4fc96318:0000000000000004: OID_NOT_FOUND: 0000000000000004
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:19681: load 0285cbac4fc96318:0000000000000004: 0000000000000004: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac547ae165:0000000000000005: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:19681: load 0285cbac547ae165:0000000000000005: OID_NOT_FOUND: 0000000000000005
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:19681: load 0285cbac547ae165:0000000000000005: 0000000000000005: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac628f5c4b:0000000000000006: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:19681: load 0285cbac628f5c4b:0000000000000006: OID_NOT_FOUND: 0000000000000006
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:19681: load 0285cbac628f5c4b:0000000000000006: 0000000000000006: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbaca444447f:0000000000000007: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:19681: load 0285cbaca444447f:0000000000000007: OID_NOT_FOUND: 0000000000000007
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:19681: load 0285cbaca444447f:0000000000000007: 0000000000000007: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbacbbbbbbff:0000000000000008: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:19681: load 0285cbacbbbbbbff:0000000000000008: OID_NOT_FOUND: 0000000000000008
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:19681: load 0285cbacbbbbbbff:0000000000000008: 0000000000000008: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbad80da7498:0000000000000009: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:19681: load 0285cbad80da7498:0000000000000009: OID_NOT_FOUND: 0000000000000009
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:19681: load 0285cbad80da7498:0000000000000009: 0000000000000009: object was not yet created

a2b8516c

go/neo/neonet: Increase signal/noise in dump of packets with decode problems · dacce3d1

Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 04, 2020

We recently hit "decode: buffer overflow" errors due to mismatch in
between NEO/go and NEO/py (see previous patch). With dumpio=true that
problem was showing itself as

    127.0.0.1:50624 > 127.0.0.1:41863: .5 GetObject &{0000000000000000 ffffffffffffffff 0285cbac258bf266}
    127.0.0.1:50624 < 127.0.0.1:41863: .5 (proto.Error) decode: buffer overflow; #24 [24]: 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 10 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 Error ACK ;  [24]tail: 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 10 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac258bf265:0000000000000000: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:24078: load 0285cbac258bf265:0000000000000000: 127.0.0.1:50624 - 127.0.0.1:41863 .5: decode: decode: buffer overflow
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:24078: load 0285cbac258bf265:0000000000000000: 0000000000000000: object was not yet created

Here after printing error and dumping all bytes from packet payload, it
was printing again message type, message value from to-be-decoded place
(which is zero-initialized) and data bytes again.
-> Fix it not to print anything after dump of payload data:

    127.0.0.1:60518 > 127.0.0.1:46719: .5 GetObject &{0000000000000000 ffffffffffffffff 0285cbac258bf266}
    127.0.0.1:60518 < 127.0.0.1:46719: .5 (Error) decode: buffer overflow; #24 [24]: 00 00 00 03 00 00 00 10 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac258bf265:0000000000000000: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:27853: load 0285cbac258bf265:0000000000000000: 127.0.0.1:60518 - 127.0.0.1:46719 .5: decode: decode: buffer overflow
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:27853: load 0285cbac258bf265:0000000000000000: 0000000000000000: object was not yet created

dacce3d1

fixup! go/neo/proto: Switch enum encoding from int32 to int8 · 52cd5b4f

Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 04, 2020

In commit 144dafa0 I changed enum encodings from int32 to int8, but did
not noticed that NEO/py commit 52db5607 ("protocol: a single byte is
more than enough to encode enums") despite specified intent and
ErrorCodes being marked with @Enum, changed encoding only for fields
that are marked as PEnum in structures. In NEO/py the Error.code field
is still marked as PNumber which encodes as 32-bit integer on the wire.
-> Fix it back.

With recent xtesting.DrvTestLoad update this error was manifesting itself as

--- FAIL: TestLoad (2.08s)
    --- FAIL: TestLoad/py (2.07s)
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac258bf265:0000000000000000: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac258bf265:0000000000000000: 127.0.0.1:42288 - 127.0.0.1:37109 .5: decode: decode: buffer overflow
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac258bf265:0000000000000000: 0000000000000000: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac3d0369e5:0000000000000001: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac3d0369e5:0000000000000001: 127.0.0.1:42288 - 127.0.0.1:37109 .13: decode: decode: buffer overflow
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac3d0369e5:0000000000000001: 0000000000000001: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac41b4e832:0000000000000002: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac41b4e832:0000000000000002: 127.0.0.1:42288 - 127.0.0.1:37109 .21: decode: decode: buffer overflow
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac41b4e832:0000000000000002: 0000000000000002: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac4666667f:0000000000000003: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac4666667f:0000000000000003: 127.0.0.1:42288 - 127.0.0.1:37109 .29: decode: decode: buffer overflow
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac4666667f:0000000000000003: 0000000000000003: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac4fc96318:0000000000000004: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac4fc96318:0000000000000004: 127.0.0.1:42288 - 127.0.0.1:37109 .41: decode: decode: buffer overflow
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac4fc96318:0000000000000004: 0000000000000004: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac547ae165:0000000000000005: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac547ae165:0000000000000005: 127.0.0.1:42288 - 127.0.0.1:37109 .49: decode: decode: buffer overflow
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac547ae165:0000000000000005: 0000000000000005: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbac628f5c4b:0000000000000006: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac628f5c4b:0000000000000006: 127.0.0.1:42288 - 127.0.0.1:37109 .65: decode: decode: buffer overflow
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbac628f5c4b:0000000000000006: 0000000000000006: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbaca444447f:0000000000000007: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbaca444447f:0000000000000007: 127.0.0.1:42288 - 127.0.0.1:37109 .125: decode: decode: buffer overflow
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbaca444447f:0000000000000007: 0000000000000007: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbacbbbbbbff:0000000000000008: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbacbbbbbbff:0000000000000008: 127.0.0.1:42288 - 127.0.0.1:37109 .149: decode: decode: buffer overflow
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbacbbbbbbff:0000000000000008: 0000000000000008: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:306: load 0285cbad80da7498:0000000000000009: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbad80da7498:0000000000000009: 127.0.0.1:42288 - 127.0.0.1:37109 .269: decode: decode: buffer overflow
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 0285cbad80da7498:0000000000000009: 0000000000000009: object was not yet created
        xtesting.go:331: load 7fffffffffffffff:000000000000000a: returned err unexpected:
            have: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 7fffffffffffffff:000000000000000a: 127.0.0.1:42288 - 127.0.0.1:37109 .295: decode: decode: buffer overflow
            want: neo://1@127.0.0.1:32731: load 7fffffffffffffff:000000000000000a: 000000000000000a: no such object

52cd5b4f

go/zodb/zeo: Load: loadBefore RPC can return None to indicate non-existing object · 080d5450

Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 04, 2020

Before this patch and with updated DrvTestLoad (see previous patch) it was failing as:

080d5450

go/internal/xtesting: DrvTestLoad: Verify load of non-existing and not-yet-created objects · 523298bc
Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 04, 2020
```
This currently fails on ZEO and NEO. Those storages will be fixed in the
following patches.
```
523298bc

03 Nov, 2020 6 commits

. · eb8d8682
Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 03, 2020

eb8d8682
X py: Don't import MySQLdb where it is not needed · d84749a8
Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 03, 2020

d84749a8

Merge branch 'master' into t · 3e7dfb6a

Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 03, 2020

* master:
  neotest: test-go: Disable test results caching
  go/neo/t: nxd/runTestSuite was generalized and factored-out into nxdtest

3e7dfb6a

. · 2d1d3ebd
Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 03, 2020

2d1d3ebd

neotest: test-go: Disable test results caching · d8b51133

Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 03, 2020

Starting from Go1.10 `go test` caches successful test results[1].
However we want to torture the implementation and run the tests for real
each time `neotest test-go` is ran.

-> Disable tests caching

[1] https://golang.org/doc/go1.10#test

d8b51133

go/neo/t: nxd/runTestSuite was generalized and factored-out into nxdtest · 19ff426a

Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 03, 2020

See:

- https://lab.nexedi.com/nexedi/nxdtest
- https://lab.nexedi.com/nexedi/nxdtest/blob/master/nxdtest/__init__.py
- nexedi/nxdtest@d575236a
- nexedi/slapos!839

-> Leave only .nxdtest file with neotest-specific bits to be run by
nxdtest driver.

19ff426a

01 Nov, 2020 5 commits

Merge branch 'master' into t · a179fa40
Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 01, 2020
```
* master:
```
a179fa40

Sync with NEO/py v1.12-13-g (oldproto branch) · d14040ac

Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 01, 2020

* origin/old-proto:
  qa: skip broken ZODB test
  client: fix race with invalidations when starting a new transaction on ZODB 5
  Code clean-up, comment fixes
  master: fix crash in STARTING_BACKUP when connecting to an upstream secondary master
  mysql: workaround for MDEV-20693
  client: inline Application._loadFromCache
  client: replace global load lock by a per-oid one
  client: unindent code
  client: remove load lock in tpc_finish
  qa: check cache in testExternalInvalidation
  qa: comment testExternalInvalidation2

d14040ac

Sync with NEO/py v1.12-13-g (oldproto branch) · 3a6a3475

Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 01, 2020

* origin/old-proto:
  qa: skip broken ZODB test
  client: fix race with invalidations when starting a new transaction on ZODB 5
  Code clean-up, comment fixes
  master: fix crash in STARTING_BACKUP when connecting to an upstream secondary master
  mysql: workaround for MDEV-20693
  client: inline Application._loadFromCache
  client: replace global load lock by a per-oid one
  client: unindent code
  client: remove load lock in tpc_finish
  qa: check cache in testExternalInvalidation
  qa: comment testExternalInvalidation2

3a6a3475

Merge branch 'master' into t · a4bf053e

Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 01, 2020

* master:
  go/neo/proto: Version 5 -> 6
  go/neo/proto: tweak += dry-run
  go/neo/proto: ErrorCode += DENIED
  go/neo/proto: AnswerPartitionList += NumReplicas
  go/neo/proto: Sync with NEO/py on changes to make the number of replicas modifiable at runtime
  go/neo/proto: RequestIdentification += NewNID; Move .DevPath

a4bf053e

Sync with NEO/py v1.12 · 8ea85c71
Kirill Smelkov authored Nov 01, 2020

8ea85c71