- 24 Apr, 2024 3 commits
-
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
NEO/py sometimes sends 'None' for boolean values (being equal to 'False' due to pythons 'bool(None) == False' logic). Let's accept python based False values (= Nil) as equally acceptable. Without this patch we can see errors as: xtesting.go:330: load 0285cbad6e147b66:0000000000000005: returned err unexpected: have: neo://127.0.0.1:30002/1: load 0285cbad6e147b66:0000000000000005: 127.0.0.1:48928 - 127.0.0.1:33051 .251: decode: decode: M: AnswerObject.Compression/op: got opcode 00; expected any from c3c2
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
In pre-msgpack protocol an 'INVALID_{TID,OID}' was always decoded as 'None' in NEO/py [1]. But in msgpack protocol this isn't true anymore. An `INVALID_TID` is now decoded as an `INVALID_TID`. And this then leads to errors later [2]. Instead of restoring NEO/py to a pre-msgpack behaviour, we fix this on NEO/go side by encoding 'INVALID_{TID,OID}' to NIL on the wire. This is good as it makes the messages we send smaller. [1] https://lab.nexedi.com/nexedi/neoppod/-/blob/6332112cba979dfd29b40fe9f98d097911fde696/neo/lib/protocol.py#L579-583 [2] With SQLite backend we can see the following exception: Traceback (most recent call last): File "/home/levin/neo/neo/tests/functional/__init__.py", line 192, in start self.run() File "/home/levin/neo/neo/tests/functional/__init__.py", line 288, in run getattr(neo.scripts, self.command).main() File "/home/levin/neo/neo/scripts/neostorage.py", line 32, in main app.run() File "/home/levin/neo/neo/storage/app.py", line 196, in run self._run() File "/home/levin/neo/neo/storage/app.py", line 227, in _run self.doOperation() File "/home/levin/neo/neo/storage/app.py", line 301, in doOperation poll() File "/home/levin/neo/neo/storage/app.py", line 145, in _poll self.em.poll(1) File "/home/levin/neo/neo/lib/event.py", line 160, in poll to_process.process() File "/home/levin/neo/neo/lib/connection.py", line 508, in process self._handlers.handle(self, self._queue.pop(0)) File "/home/levin/neo/neo/lib/connection.py", line 93, in handle self._handle(connection, packet) File "/home/levin/neo/neo/lib/connection.py", line 108, in _handle pending[0][1].packetReceived(connection, packet) File "/home/levin/neo/neo/lib/handler.py", line 125, in packetReceived self.dispatch(*args) File "/home/levin/neo/neo/lib/handler.py", line 75, in dispatch method(conn, *args, **kw) File "/home/levin/neo/neo/storage/handlers/client.py", line 67, in askObject o = app.dm.getObject(oid, at, before) File "/home/levin/neo/neo/storage/database/manager.py", line 484, in getObject before_tid and u64(before_tid)) File "/home/levin/neo/neo/storage/database/sqlite.py", line 336, in _getObject r = q(sql + ' AND tid=?', (partition, oid, tid)) OverflowError: Python int too large to convert to SQLite INTEGER
-
- 10 Apr, 2024 1 commit
-
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
This reverts commit 4b25a225.
-
- 09 Apr, 2024 1 commit
-
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
-
- 08 Apr, 2024 2 commits
-
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
Structures are encoded as arrays, but this isn't true for the structure 'RowList'. RowList in python is simply a list of lists. It's not a nested array, as using a structure would expect. Therefore we need a special case for RowList. Alternatively we could adjust proto.go to no longer use 'RowList', but simply '[][]CellInfo', but this would perhaps break N encoding.
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
-
- 07 Apr, 2024 4 commits
-
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
certainly we need to adjust this in protogen and not in zproto-marshal, the question is only what's the best way how this could be done..
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
-
- 06 Apr, 2024 1 commit
-
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
-
- 19 Mar, 2024 1 commit
-
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
In pre-msgpack protocol, the msgcode increment logic is like this: Notify add +1 to next msgcode Request add +0 to next msgcode (next msg is answer & should therefore be the same) Answer add +1 to next msgcode ('Answer' msgcode is adjusted by 'AnswerBit') In post-msgpack protocol, the logic is a bit different: Notify add +1 to next msgcode Request add +0 to next msgcode (next msg is answer & should therefore be the same) Answer add +2 to next msgcode So here we produce gaps after Request/Answer pairs. In the current version, this patch breaks the functionality of the pre-msgpack protocol, because for both protocols the same msgcodes are used. To still support 'N' we need to use different msgcodes depending on if 'N' or 'M' is used.
-
- 18 Mar, 2024 1 commit
-
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
-
- 15 Mar, 2024 2 commits
-
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
This fixes a stucked client: now the handshake packet is correctly proceeded.
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
-
- 14 Mar, 2024 5 commits
-
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
This is a fix of 1cf2712f: 'AppendString' is the equivalent to NEO/py 'NEO' encoding, not 'AppendBytes'.
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
Because 'err' was locally assigned inside the loop of 'DialLink' [1], it was always 'nil' as a function return value, even when 'handshakeClient' actually returned an error. This lead to the unfortunate situation that the function sometimes returned 'link=nil' and 'err=nil', so that the function caller tried to access 'link' attributes which lead to 'runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference'. This patch fixes this and now the function correctly returns an error if the dialing fails. [1] `peerConn, err := networker.Dial(ctx, addr)`
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
-
Julien Muchembled authored
Not only for performance reasons (at least 3% faster) but also because of several ugly things in the way packets were defined: - packet field names, which are only documentary; for roots fields, they even just duplicate the packet names - a lot of repetitions for packet names, and even confusion between the name of the packet definition and the name of the actual notify/request packet - the need to implement field types for anything, like PByte to support new compression formats, since PBoolean is not enough neo/lib/protocol.py is now much smaller.
-
- 02 Feb, 2024 3 commits
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
* master: go/zodb: Handle common options in zurl in generic layer
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
/reviewed-by @kirr /reviewed-on kirr/neo!4 * kirr/t+new-uri: Revert "Y client: Adjust URI scheme to move client-specific options to fragment" fixup! client.go: Fix URI client option parsing for supported + unsupported options client.go: Fix URI client option parsing for supported + unsupported options fixup! client_test: Add tests for NEO URI parser client_test: Add tests for NEO URI parser fixup! client: Refactor openClientByURL for easier testing client: Refactor openClientByURL for easier testing Y go/zodb: Handle common options in zurl in generic layer
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
Offload drivers from handling options such as ?read-only=1 and force them to deal with such options only via DriverOptions, never zurl. See added comment for details. /reviewed-by @levin.zimmermann /reviewed-on kirr/neo!4
-
- 29 Jan, 2024 8 commits
-
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
This reverts commit kirr/neo@4c9414ea. This patch was added at a time when nexedi/neoppod!18 wasn't resolved yet, but we already wanted to proceed with WCFS. Now the NEO MR is resolved and we decided to mostly leave the NEO zurl as it was originally implemented in nexedi/neoppod!6. This means we don't need this patch anymore which changed the NEO zurl format.
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
readonly is handled by common zodb.OpenDriver.
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
Before this patch, the parser ignored options which were already supported by the client (for instance 'read-only') and even raised an error. But the client can already use this option: as a9246333 describes this should happen in the local storage URL parser. Furthermore not-yet-supported client options (for instance compress) broke the NEO client before this patch. Now these options only raise a warning which informs the user that they are ignored. Why? We want to use pre-complete NEO in real-world projects together with NEO/py clusters. Those real-world projects may already specify options which aren't supported by our NEO/go client yet. But it doesn't matters so much, because those options are mostly relevant for other NEO/py cluster clients (e.g. zope nodes). Instead of filtering those parameters before parsing them to NEO/go in a higher level (e.g. SlapOS), NEO/go should already support any valid NEO URL and raise warnings for not yet implemented features.
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
- use simplified parseURL signature - DriverOptions are not passed nor changed there. - read-only is handled by generic zodb layer not neo.parseURL .
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
This test was missing so far. Particularly recent changes of the NEO URI scheme [1], but also problems with valid old URI [2] stressed out the necessity for comprehensive NEO URI parser tests. [1] kirr/neo@4c9414ea [2] 573514c6 (comment 184417)
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
- no need to pass DriverOptions into parseURL - it is only zurl that is parsed, and also DriverOptions should not be changed by the opener. - no need to document "If anything fails within this process an error and nil are returned." because that is standard omnipresent Go convention.
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
With all the recent changes of the NEO URI scheme we need to reliably test the function which parses the URI and convert it into the different parameter. Testing is much simpler if we can only analyse how the URI parsing works. Therefore this patch moves NEO URI parsing to an external function.
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
Offload drivers from handling options such as ?read-only=1 and force them to deal with such options only via DriverOptions, never zurl. See added commend for details.
-
- 22 Aug, 2023 1 commit
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
I missed the following build failure in go/neo/cmd: # lab.nexedi.com/kirr/neo/go/neo/cmd/neo ./storage.go:128:37: cannot use master (variable of type string) as []string value in argument to neo.NewStorage
-
- 02 Aug, 2023 7 commits
-
-
Levin Zimmermann authored
See kirr/neo!2 for discussion, context and details. /reviewed-by @kirr * t-with-multiple-master-nodes: fixup! client_test: Add nmaster={1,2} to test matrix fixup! client_test: Support test cluster /w >1 master fixup! TalkMaster: Switch master if dialed M is secondary fixup! Node: Add support for NEO cluster with > 1 master fixup! Dial: Catch NotPrimaryMaster & return custom error fixup! proto: Implement Error for NotPrimaryMaster fixup! proto.NotPrimaryMaster: Fix .Primary data type (2) fixup! proto.NotPrimaryMaster: Fix .Primary data type (1) client_test: Add nmaster={1,2} to test matrix client_test: Support test cluster /w >1 master proto.NotPrimaryMaster: Fix .Primary data type TalkMaster: Switch master if dialed M is secondary Dial: Catch NotPrimaryMaster & return custom error proto: Implement Error for NotPrimaryMaster openClientByURL: Fix for >1 master (split URL host) Client.URL: Fix incomplete URL if > 1 master nodes Node: Add support for NEO cluster with > 1 master
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
Actually do test nmaster=2 case.
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
- show all options in error context and ran test kind - skip nmaster > 1 for NEO/go as that is currently not implemented on NEO/go server - use json for interacting with runneo.py, so that we can use whatever builtin type for any argument without hardcoding ad-hoc handling of specific arguments inside runneo.py. - adjust comments + cosmetics
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
- validate received NotPrimaryMaster - use Address.String() instead of printf with format that works only for ipv6 - add some logging, comments and TODO
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
- no need to keep Node.MasterAddr anymore - the address of current PM is managed by TalkMaster and is provided as part of operational context to user functions that TalkMaster runs. - correct docstrings. - cosmetics.
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
Expect NotPrimaryMaster only if we are trying to connect to a master.
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
Provide details in the error message.
-