An error occurred fetching the project authors.
- 27 Mar, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Julien Muchembled authored
-
- 26 Mar, 2015 2 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This uses much less memory
-
- 25 Mar, 2015 4 commits
-
-
Julien Muchembled authored
-
Julien Muchembled authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
basically, rewrite : self.assertEqual(result_of_complex_method, result_of_another_complex_method) into: self.assertEqual(expected_value, result_of_another_complex_method)
-
- 23 Mar, 2015 6 commits
-
-
Tristan Cavelier authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
This allow to get localstorage compatibility with binary files.
-
Gabriel Monnerat authored
erp5_accounting: Improve code to only consider the line that has source and destination section equal the transaction in context
-
Aurel authored
-
Aurel authored
-
- 22 Mar, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
- 18 Mar, 2015 2 commits
-
-
Tristan Cavelier authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
[erp5_web] Partial revert "Allow to configure ERP5 frontpage gadget, hateoas URL and application title." This reverts commit e4bfb062. Those files were commited by mistake.
-
- 17 Mar, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Julien Muchembled authored
-
- 16 Mar, 2015 2 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
- 13 Mar, 2015 3 commits
- 12 Mar, 2015 2 commits
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
This reverts 4f3bb0c9 (Revert "BigFile: Fixes, Tests and on-server Append support") and thus continues the story of 193f5cdd (BigFile: Fixes, Tests and on-server Append support) and essentially restores the result of that merge. Initial idea was to give people time to better see how to handle code submisstion, but in the end Romain approved it as is. Reference: https://lab.nexedi.cn/nexedi/erp5/merge_requests/5 (= merge request !5)
-
Romain Courteaud authored
The configuration is done on the WebSite level. No custom JS code is needed.
-
- 11 Mar, 2015 10 commits
-
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
This reverts commit 193f5cdd, reversing changes made to 4ee61a23. Jean-Paul suggested we first better further review our code review / merging procedures and use e.g. this particular merge request as a basis for that. Thus I'm reverting this merge, so people could study and re-merge it "properly". ~~~~ Please note: I could potentially rewrite master history so that there would be a no merge commit at all, as e.g. my branch was not so far ever merged at all. In contrast to draft branches, that is however a not good practice to rebase, and thus rewrite, master history - what has been committed is committed and we only continue. So later to re-merge my branch, if it will not be changed, we'll need to first revert this revert (see [1] for rationale), or alternatively I could re-prepare my patches with different sha1 ids and they will merge again the "usual way". [1] http://git-scm.com/docs/howto/revert-a-faulty-merge.html
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
The configuration is done on the Web Site level, to reduce the need to write custom JS code.
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
Ensure that the data format returned is stable. By default, imit the number of documents returned by the search. Do not return document properties outside the form rendering. Minor bug fixes.
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kirill Smelkov authored
For my current project I needed to rework BigFile interface to support on-server data appension. But while doing so I've discovered in many places current BigFile code could crash and is not working properly. Thus this patch series contain: 1) fixes for discovered bugs; 2) support for on-server data append via exposing ._dataAppend(data_chunk) method; 3) basic tests for BigFile (so that we know fixes are proper and we won't regress on the same things in the future). Newly introduced BigFile tests were verified to pass on the testrunner: https://nexedi.erp5.net/test_result_module/20150303-3789A033 https://nexedi.erp5.net/test_result_module/20150303-3789A033/7 NOTE running the whole testsuite failed because of: - erp5_test_result:testTaskDistribution failure https://nexedi.erp5.net/test_result_module/20150303-3789A033/23 . testTaskDistribution is currently failing from time-to-time even on ERP5-MASTER tests, e.g. here https://nexedi.erp5.net/test_result_module/20150226-1F4459D0, so from my point of view that should not be related to BigFile at all. Origin: http://lab.nexedi.cn/kirr/erp5 y/bigfile-fixes+append-v2 Reviewed-on: https://lab.nexedi.cn/nexedi/erp5/merge_requests/3 (= merge request !3) ~~~~~~~~ * 'y/bigfile-fixes+append-v2' of http://lab.nexedi.cn/kirr/erp5: BigFile: Basic tests bt5/erp5_big_file: Regenerate BigFile: Fix most errors reported by pyflakes BigFile: Factor out code to append data chunk to ._appendData() BigFile: .data can be BTreeData or None or (possibly non-empty) str BigFile: Factor out "get .data mtime" into helper BigFile: No need to explicitly convert btree=None -> BTreeData() in PUT
-
- 10 Mar, 2015 4 commits
-
-
Gabriel Monnerat authored
-
Sebastien Robin authored
-
Sebastien Robin authored
-
Sebastien Robin authored
before, the code was going through an error when no date was found for doing stock optimisation. But we do date is found, this only means that the stock is not going below the expected value, so we do not need to do any optimisation
-
- 09 Mar, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
so that we can customise the color easily.
-
- 06 Mar, 2015 1 commit
-
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
because we have no such generic property and this field can cause TypeError when saving.
-