- 17 Nov, 2016 38 commits
-
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
Also fixed test events ordering issue
-
James Lopez authored
Now test events return the builds instead a list of pipelines to avoid calling pipeline.builds per each and get the info. Also, added missing fields/data, URLs, and fixed specs in events spec.
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
added missing fields to issue. Also, added a light url builder to add URLs easily from arel. Updated specs.
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
add pipeline id to merge request metrics table. Also, updated the pipeline worker to populate this field.
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
- Refactored cycle analytics class to extract DB logic - Reuse logic in new events fetcher - Started adding cycle analytics events class and spec (still not functional)
-
Sean McGivern authored
tests: Move rake assets:precompile and cloning gitlab-{shell,test} to the prepare stage Related to #23034 See merge request !7512
-
- 16 Nov, 2016 2 commits
-
-
Kamil Trzciński authored
Update the updated_at of a build while patching the trace ## What does this MR do? Fixes build patching trace. It should update the `updated_at` field of a build to make sure it will not be removed by `stuck_ci_builds_worker`. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Construction of a test for the bug. ## Why was this MR needed? Please read #22087 for a reference. ## Screenshots (if relevant) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Fixes #22087 See merge request !7146
-
Annabel Dunstone Gray authored
Added colored labels to related MR list. ## What does this MR do? Added colored labels to related MR list. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Yes, I think haml can be better. ## Why was this MR needed? There was an issue for this #21200 ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-15_at_21.04.24](/uploads/b601f33f23cdc3318d01279e17deb096/Screen_Shot_2016-11-15_at_21.04.24.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Fixes !21200 See merge request !7486
-