An error occurred fetching the project authors.
- 09 Mar, 2012 6 commits
-
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
While *trying* to confirm order *try* to assign partition.
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
It minimises amount of Open Order versions and simplifies locking. One Alarm to rule them all, One Alarm to find them, One Alarm to bring them all and in the catalog bind them
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
- 08 Mar, 2012 9 commits
-
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
Use alarm with "windowing" support to slowly remove not needed lines.
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
Cutting spaghetti is better then trying to untie it.
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
- 07 Mar, 2012 11 commits
-
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
This reverts commit a1df26c9. Conflicts: master/bt5/vifib_slap/bt/revision
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
Correct condition, it shall be inverted. Fix wrong name open_order. No need to archive - some other magic does it already.
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
Also detect tag in add_kw and relock on it.
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
Person_updateOpenOrder will be single point to manipulate open orders.
-
- 06 Mar, 2012 1 commit
-
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
- 02 Mar, 2012 6 commits
-
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
By registering noop activity on alarm itself which depends on tag used in alarm only one alarm will be run in same time.
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
slap_interaction_workflow has already global scope of interaction, so keep it like this and do not add yet another workflow to do one interaction.
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
Some Software and Slave instances can have too old clenaup deliveries.
-
- 01 Mar, 2012 7 commits
-
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
It might happen that something else is newer then cleanup delivery (eg. because of user was able to ask to stop/start just after cleanup). So clone currently waiting cleanup delivery with date newer then previous one and replace it. Thanks to this instance destruction will be possible.
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
-
Łukasz Nowak authored
They are related to Open Orders, which logic is incorrect.
-