- 13 Apr, 2004 8 commits
-
-
Fred Drake authored
-
Fred Drake authored
-
Fred Drake authored
-
Fred Drake authored
ZServer package.
-
Fred Drake authored
aren't needed any more
-
Fred Drake authored
is an API shim to the logging module. No more competing initializations!
-
Fred Drake authored
implementation. The configuration aspects of zLOG are about to disappear.
-
Fred Drake authored
can import just one of eventlog and logger if desired. This is needed for Zope 2 to allow the main Zope configuration to only use eventlog, since the name "logger" is used for something else.
-
- 12 Apr, 2004 2 commits
-
-
Fred Drake authored
-
Fred Drake authored
-
- 09 Apr, 2004 8 commits
-
-
Fred Drake authored
think they're allowed to do it. For now, just let zLOG initialize everything; we can figure out the right way to make zLOG and logging co-habitate later.
-
Fred Drake authored
- don't dump everything into the "event" logger; use the subsystem argument to zLOG.LOG to get a specific logger - move some comments into docstrings
-
Fred Drake authored
-
Fred Drake authored
-
Fred Drake authored
constructor (potentially) changes the directory
-
Fred Drake authored
-
Gintautas Miliauskas authored
places.
-
Gintautas Miliauskas authored
-
- 08 Apr, 2004 2 commits
-
-
Fred Drake authored
be done as late as possible (if ever)
-
Tim Peters authored
DB._closeConnection() sets the connection's _db member to None now, under protection of the lock it holds anyway. At a deeper level, it's unclear why _db keeps getting set and unset to begin with, but no time for that now (and there are already XXX comments about it in the code). Alas, I wasn't able to write a test that provoked the original bug in finite time (it's a tiny timing hole), except via calling sleep() between two lines that don't exist anymore. Good enough.
-
- 06 Apr, 2004 3 commits
-
-
Tim Peters authored
an object as a non-negative integer. Code trying to pass addresses to an %x format uses positive_id(), and this avoids a Python FutureWarning about applying %x to negative ints. The primary difference between this and the last stab is that positive_id() should work OK on 64-bit boxes too. What we really want here is C's %p format code, but in Python we can't even reliably know the width of native addresses.
-
Tim Peters authored
negative ints *as* negative ints when fed into %x formats. Python 2.3 still renders them as positive ints, but spews FutureWarning: %u/%o/%x/%X of negative int will return a signed string in Python 2.4 and up to warn about the impending change. Jim reported two instances of that warning when running the tests on a box where addresses happen to "be negative". So make the addresses look positive instead (2.3 and 2.4 treat those the same, so 2.3 doesn't warn about those). Problem: it occurs to me now that I'm assuming addresses fit in 32 bits here.
-
Tim Peters authored
the former, remember it and raise it after calling _cleanup. If abort_sub() or tpc_abort() in _cleanup() also raise exceptions, log them but don't propagate them. This stops stray output produced by tests testExceptionInTpcAbort and testExceptionInSubAbortSub. Grrrrr: I haven't yet been able to figure out how to get logging to work in ZODB, so haven't yet been able to check that the new logging is reasonable.
-
- 05 Apr, 2004 2 commits
-
-
Tim Peters authored
import here wasn't changed to track it. Repaired.
-
Tim Peters authored
get_transaction() is still stuffed into __builtin__ as a magical side effect of importing ZODB.
-
- 02 Apr, 2004 3 commits
-
-
Tim Peters authored
testExceptionInTpcAbort(). The cause is clear now, but a solution isn't; an exception in tpc_abort is nasty.
-
Tim Peters authored
(something's not right in this test).
-
Fred Drake authored
-
- 01 Apr, 2004 2 commits
-
-
Tim Peters authored
taught about the new "transaction" package.
-
Jeremy Hylton authored
This branch introduces a new transaction API. The key features are: - top-level functions in transaction -- get(), commit(), abort() - explicit transaction manager objects - Transaction objects are used for exactly one transaction - support for transaction synchronizers The changes here are still provisional, but we want to get them off an obscure branch and onto the head for further development.
-
- 30 Mar, 2004 2 commits
-
-
Tim Peters authored
of pack in buffered mode, then switching to unbuffered mode to copy the tail, actually broke pack completely on Windows: we didn't close the buffered file handle before opening the unbuffered one, and self.gc held on to the still-open former handle. This prevented the caller from renaming Data.fs to Data.fs.old (a handle on Data.fs was still open). The cure is simply to close a handle when we stop using it.
-
Jeremy Hylton authored
Only open the file for unbuffered I/O after finishing the first phase of pack. The first phase gets its end-of-file position from the main thread, so there's no possibility of reading a 'c' record. Timings on Linux are inconclusive, but it seems like using buffered I/O for the initial phase should be faster.
-
- 23 Mar, 2004 1 commit
-
-
Stephan Richter authored
-
- 21 Mar, 2004 3 commits
-
-
Stephane Fermingier authored
-
Stephane Fermingier authored
-
Stephane Fermingier authored
-
- 18 Mar, 2004 2 commits
-
-
Tim Peters authored
can still be in progress, and they're written to the same physical file via a different file object. Using buffered I/O in the packer creates the possiblity for the packer to see stale data from its file object's stdio buffers. This is now known to happen under Linux, Gentoo, OS X, Cygwin, and Debian. It apparently doesn't happen under native Windows, which is why everyone except me has been seeing the new checkPackLotsWhileWriting test fail. This will probably need to be backported everywhere, but first I want to see in which new way checkPackLotsWhileWriting fails on 48 Linux boxes overnight <wink>.
-
- 17 Mar, 2004 2 commits
-
-
Tim Peters authored
FileStorageError: The database has already been packed to a later time or no changes have been made since the last pack exception. Instead that message is logged (at INFO level), and the pack attempt simply returns then (no pack is performed). Incidentally, this should repair frequent reports of failure in the new checkPackLotsWhileWriting test. On non-Windows systems, it seems that the worker thread often didn't get enough cycles to commit a change between the main thread's attempts to run pack() (and so the exception above got raised then).
-
Tim Peters authored
thread is interesting here, so removed the hair catering to the possiblity of N > 1 threads.
-