erp5_bank_reconciliation: accept confirmed movement in simulation

bt5/erp5_bank_reconciliation/SkinTemplateItem/portal_skins/erp5_bank_reconciliation/BankReconciliation_getAccountBalance.xml

@@ -54,7 +54,7 @@
   \'section_uid\': context.getSourceSectionUid(),\n
   \'payment_uid\': context.getSourcePaymentUid(),\n
   \'node_category\': \'account_type/asset/cash/bank\',\n
-  \'simulation_state\': (\'stopped\', \'delivered\', ),\n
+  \'simulation_state\': (\'stopped\', \'delivered\', \'confirmed\'),\n
   \'portal_type\': context.getPortalAccountingMovementTypeList()\n
 }\n
 \n

bt5/erp5_bank_reconciliation/SkinTemplateItem/portal_skins/erp5_bank_reconciliation/BankReconciliation_getAccountingTransactionLineList.xml

@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ kw = {\n
   \'section_uid\': context.getSourceSectionUid(),\n
   \'payment_uid\': context.getSourcePaymentUid(),\n
   \'node_category\': \'account_type/asset/cash/bank\',\n
-  \'simulation_state\': (\'stopped\', \'delivered\', ),\n
+  \'simulation_state\': (\'stopped\', \'delivered\', \'confirmed\' ),\n
   \'portal_type\': context.getPortalAccountingMovementTypeList(),\n
   \'sort_on\': ((\'date\', \'ASC\'), (\'uid\', \'ASC\'))\n
 }\n

bt5/erp5_bank_reconciliation/SkinTemplateItem/portal_skins/erp5_bank_reconciliation/BankReconciliation_getReconciledAccountBalance.xml

@@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ kw = {\n
   \'section_uid\': context.getSourceSectionUid(),\n
   \'payment_uid\': context.getSourcePaymentUid(),\n
   \'node_category\': \'account_type/asset/cash/bank\',\n
-  \'simulation_state\': (\'stopped\', \'delivered\', ),\n
+  \'simulation_state\': (\'stopped\', \'delivered\', \'confirmed\' ),\n
   \'portal_type\': portal.getPortalAccountingMovementTypeList(),\n
 }\n
 \n

[Jérome Perrin]

@tc We have pending discussion on this. Please do not merge for now

[Jérome Perrin]

conclusion of this discussion is that this change can be dropped