- 22 Feb, 2022 1 commit
-
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
See merge request nexedi/erp5!1516
-
- 21 Feb, 2022 13 commits
-
-
Gabriel Monnerat authored
The initial idea was that publishing documents is something really exceptional, the "attach document" normal use case is typically use cases like attaching a PDF invoice to an invoice document in accounting, ie. most of the time it's with sensitive information that we don't want users to be mistakenly publish on the internet just because they selected a wrong value in the field. Now we have a project with use cases where the attached documents needs to be published, we did not change our mind that publishing an attached document is an exceptional case, but we want to make it possible to configure so that in certain contexts, publishing documents is possible. So we reuse the existing configuration by type based method idea and when the getPreferredAttachedDocumentPublicationState returns "published" we make it possible to publish by default.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Theses methods have always been using user_id, but where written at a time where there was not such disctinction
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This test case tries to provide message helpful for debugging in case of assertion failure for assertUserCanPassWorkflowTransition, but this was not correctly using new workflow API and in case of failure there was an error like this: File ".../custom/test.py" self.assertUserCanPassWorkflowTransition(user, 'stop_action', packing_list) File "product/ERP5Type/tests/SecurityTestCase.py", line 237, in failUnlessUserCanPassWorkflowTransition if wf_transition.trigger_type == TRIGGER_USER_ACTION: AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'trigger_type' The previous implementation was using getGuardSummary, which no longer exist in new workflow, so we implement similar logic here. The new message changes a bit, it now look like this: AssertionError: User X can NOT pass stop_action transition on Internal Packing List at /erp5/internal_packing_list_module/20220218-22A38 (draft on delivery_causality_workflow, draft on internal_packing_list_notification_workflow, started on packing_list_workflow). Roles: [Owner, Member, Authenticated, Associate] Available transitions: deliver_action[packing_list_workflow] Expression: Permissions: Groups: * stop_action[packing_list_workflow] Expression: python: not(state_change['object'].getPortalType() == "Sale Packing List" and state_change['object'].getSimulationState() == "confirmed") Permissions: Groups:
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
1b1dbf60 (tests: also consider python unittest failures in functional tests, 2021-06-16) was not counting properly the cases where we have selenium failures. In that case we only want to count selenium failures, if we add with the python failures from status_dict, we report one extra failures. The correct approach is to count selenium failures if any and otherwise count python failures Co-authored-by: Vincent Pelletier <vincent@nexedi.com>
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
Avoids duplicating items from that list.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
Both so that changes to the list of core business templates are applied on upgrade, and to avoid uninstalling core business templates, if no other maintained-up-to-date business templates depend on them. Also, improve the documentation of the erp5_upgrader version of this script.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
But make it non-publishable.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
The main reason is to use portal type setters, and not set the properties directly: setting the properties directly bypasses interactions which trigger type refresh, which hence prevents such changes from being applied to the types until something else would cause a reload. While at it: - modify the property sheet list once only instead of once per added property sheet - only modify the property sheet list when fixit is true - improve constraint message to actually tell what is being detected - do not report a constraint error when no change is necessary - follow naming conventions: avoid abbreviations, variables holding documents must end in "_value" - avoid single-use local variables
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
This reverts commit 77b3f202. For some obscure reason, this affects unit tests related to inventory unit conversion. There seems to be too much code to cleanup to keep this patch for now, so drop it.
-
- 18 Feb, 2022 2 commits
-
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
Document/WebSite&erp5_web: introduce web site language priority convention to fix report language issue on renderjs ui 1. [Browser is supposed to send something between 0 and 1]( https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Headers/Accept-Language ) 2. [Localizer will set 2 or 3 for cases where user selected language]( https://lab.nexedi.com/nexedi/erp5/blob/08be2f8cc936fbdc3d5bafb4355c3a475198abc1/product/Localizer/Localizer.py#L149-172 ) 3. all print scripts seems set selected language priority to 10 so here we introduce a convention that site language priority should be 8(>3 and < 10) to fix report language issue
-
- 17 Feb, 2022 7 commits
-
-
Romain Courteaud authored
Fallback to modification_date if a document does not have an effective_date.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
Indexation activities may spawn further activities, and for_each_activity expects the number of activities after a test to be zero.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
System user should be more reliable than whatever user has ownership of catalog tool (which may have its account closed or its roles changed).
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
CMFActivity: Fix ActivityRuntimeEnvironment.getPriority when activity was not loaded from an SQL queue. This happens when activities are being flushed from the ActivityBuffer directly, without being inserted into and then loaded from the SQL queue. It is unclear whether there are uses of this pattern besides testCMFActivity, but it is easy enough to fix.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
Checking activity presence/absence is not enough: it risks both false negatives and false positives. Instead, manually poison the catalog's content and check which value we retrieve after executing spawned activities (if any).
-
- 16 Feb, 2022 10 commits
-
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
it's not finished, rework if need
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
Georgios Dagkakis authored
- Remove trailing whitespaces - Follow guidelines - Fixup types
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
Also, use it in Products.ERP5Type.tests.ERP5TypeTestCase.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
The only use 'my_' has above 'your_' is to provide a default field value without needing a TALES expression. This only gets applied based on the field ID in the form being rendered. Field libraries are never meant to be rendered, so using 'my_' is always (if harmless) pointless. What really matters for the field naming convention (which exist to avoid collisions with form properties) is that *some* prefix is used, be it 'my_' or 'your_'. So update this check rule to tolerate 'your_' prefixes in addition to 'my_'. Also, use 'not any([...])' instead of 'not 1 in [...]'.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
I guess this is the intention of the unnecessary pair or parentheses.
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
"Certificate Authority" is a bit long, especially as it is often followed by some other word ("Certificate", ...).
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
Abbreviations must be upper-case.
-
- 15 Feb, 2022 3 commits
-
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
-
- 14 Feb, 2022 1 commit
-
-
Vincent Pelletier authored
The precise number of entries in a bucket depend on an estimation of the size of a pickle. The pickled data contains DateTime objects, making an equality test brittle: - DateTime's timezones are stored as strings (ex: 'GMT') whose length depend on Zope's timezone, which is variable - DateTime's time is stored as a floating-point value represented as a string whose length depends on the number of units and decimals are necessary to represent its value, both being variable (one based on when the test was run, the other based on clock precision and exact test execution timing) Instead, restore the originally-considered-acceptable boundary (24) and verify that the generated value is greater or equal to it. If 24 is considered too small to be acceptable, then it is a decision independent from the present change.
-
- 13 Feb, 2022 1 commit
-
-
Julien Muchembled authored
-
- 10 Feb, 2022 2 commits
-
-
Roque authored