- 07 Apr, 2020 2 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
because we dynamically patch these modules, we run the original test suites to make sure that our patches do not introduce a regression.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Also add missing tests for other collections members, now that we make it another module.
-
- 02 Apr, 2020 6 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
tests for builtins: frozenset, set, sorted, reversed and enumerate tests for modules: json, calendar
-
Jérome Perrin authored
It did not allow iteration, probably since python 2.7. We also need to allow objects implementing __reversed__ with a custom type, I only found list.__reversed__
-
Jérome Perrin authored
If a generator is passed to restricted environment, it should be allowed to iterate on this generator
-
Jérome Perrin authored
PortalPatch instances had no security definition, so they were not supposed to be accessible from restricted environment.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Accessing attributes of CMFActivity messages was never supposed to be allowed from restricted python. Write this part with a mock instead.
-
- 01 Apr, 2020 2 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Move `BusinessTemplate_getPythonSourceCodeMessageList` to `erp5_core`, so that coding style tests don't need to install `erp5_administration` and all its dependencies. `erp5_core` is not the final place for this, because this is not required to for business template bootstrap, but this is temporary until we finish business template reorganisation. This revealed several problems of wrong dependencies between business templates that we could not see before, when coding style was installing too many business templates such as `erp5_pdm`, `erp5_trade`, `erp5_simulation`, `erp5_project`. See merge request !1089
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
ZODB Components: Interface Component: pylint was incorrectly emitting: `W: __init__ method from base class is not called`.
-
- 31 Mar, 2020 9 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
now BusinessTemplate_getPythonSourceCodeMessageList is in erp5_core
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
ZODB Components: Ignore low-level TypeProvider (TypesTool and SolverTool) classes in FS migration Dialog.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This is a script from erp5_core, but Inventory Module is a portal type from erp5_trade.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Component is not a valid prefix for python components from portal_components, it's the name of a resource class from erp5_pdm. ComponentMixin is the valid prefix.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This scripts are used only in code mirror integration
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This busines template has actions using forms from erp5_simulation, for example Rule_view on Payment Simulation Rule
-
- 30 Mar, 2020 9 commits
-
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This portal type is defined in erp5_trade, and the allowed content type in Delivery Builder is defined in erp5_trade, only the allowed content type we defined in erp5_base, which is incorrect, because it makes erp5_trade allow some non existing types in Order Builder. Fix this by moving the allowed content type in erp5_trade.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
- fix indentation - make overloaded methods accept same arguments as on parent class - use list comprehension instead of map()
-
Jérome Perrin authored
PDM has some scripts, such as Consumption_asCellRange, it seems consumption is a generic concept that should be in pdm, not in apparel.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
erp5_pdm does not depend on erp5_trade, so it cannot use proxy fields from erp5_trade
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This business template uses proxy fields from erp5_trade
-
Jérome Perrin authored
These scripts are used in coding style tests, but because it was in erp5_administration, all coding style tests had to install erp5_administration and all its dependencies. Which is against one idea of the coding style test, which is supposed to check that business templates declare their dependencies correctly, but if we install all business templates that erp5_administration depends on, the test might have false positives of missing dependencies.
-
Ivan Tyagov authored
Since 7b4a3d4c instead of subscribing after add code unsubscribed which is illogical. Revert back. Credit Kaz. Tests passing : https://nexedi.erp5.net/test_result_module/20200327-660269E/view?ignore_layout:int=1 See merge request !1092
-
Jérome Perrin authored
This is already defined in erp5_simulation, also Solver Type does not exist in erp5_base
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
-
- 27 Mar, 2020 8 commits
-
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
testUpgradeInstanceWithOldDataFs: New Unit Test to check upgrade of old instance to current ERP5 version. After copying old instance ZODB and SQL from erp5-bin.git, this checks whether instance can be successfully through upgrader. Introduced because of 140be41d.
-
Ivan Tyagov authored
Since 7b4a3d4c instead of subscribing after add code unsubscribed which is illogical. Revert back. Credit Kaz.
-
Roque authored
See merge request !1085
-
Roque authored
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
runUnitTest: Set `skip-ownership-checking true` as we already do for a normal instance through zope.conf. Related to 58c9f7c3c688854958592590dd396929b5a0c8d4 in slapos.git.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
In nexedi/erp5@935b39f9 we accidentally enabled coding style test for `erp5_project`. Let's fix the current problems reported by coding style test. See merge request !1087
-
Jérome Perrin authored
-
- 26 Mar, 2020 4 commits
-
-
Xiaowu Zhang authored
See merge request !1079
-
Lu Xu authored
-
Romain Courteaud authored
It was required by Handlebars
-
Romain Courteaud authored
-