We already use '.resample.mean()' in some projects.

/reviewed-on !1738
/reviewed-by @jerome @klaus

In some projects we use pandas resampler inside 'portal_callables'
(so with restricted Python). But we miss tests which check
whether pandas resamplers are allowed inside the restricted Python.
Due to this lack of tests we won't notice whether the usage of pandas
resamplers still work with a newer pandas version. With this patch
we can recognize if an internal change of pandas makes the resampler unusuable
in restricted Python.

/reviewed-on !1738
/reviewed-by @jerome @klaus

   By Romain

  By Romain

  Allow the developer associate a Mixin on Business template level
without require to overwrite the portal type itself

  Include mixins can be done in the same way, allowed content types or
property sheets are set.

erp5_administration: Add Scripts for Alarm to update validation state according to consistency state

    If two open orders are validated on the same transaction, archivePrevious script will get the an already archived as catalog will be outdated.

   This is an alternetive way to login using Certificates. Probably this format
   will evolve into use caucase;  however this only introduce some most basic features.

   Use Certificate Login for store login definitions

  Please squash me in future.

  If the user wants actitivites, it should create multiples StandardBT5ConfiguratorItems,
  This should accellerate Tests based on ERP5Configurator.

  This should be recoded, but it should speed up bootstrap of a site,
  as get modified objects are not called.

It the user don't have fully permission on the object (already changed state), this set will fail to check if source should be defined.

  The upgrade ordering seems buggy and requires to force reinstall it

This allow during a subscription process, create a user and them create all
documents using that user w/o rely on proxy roles (keeping good ownership
across the documents).

Without this (on slapos master ui) the redirection places value unquoted causing parser to fail later on when resolve {n.me}

  The user can be present from diferent logins, password tool only works with ERP5LoginUserMager
  users.

Returning true allows to add movements to existing one, and this group shall
always separate them.

If 2 lines have the same effective date (catalog has a 1 second precision),
always return the validate and open first.

Commit: 02d06501ce38bc24d5d045968a53017d9b96b312

Changes applied from history:

http://git.erp5.org/gitweb/erp5.git/history/refs/heads/interaction-drop:/product/ERP5/Document/SubscriptionItem.py?js=1

Original commit from : Lukasz Nowak <luke@nexedi.com>
                       3e45ec35e38c008b0f8c2ceec73d7bb9dc62e2c0

Conflicts:
	bt5/erp5_crm/bt/revision

See merge request nexedi/erp5!1732

See merge request !1731

cause by nexedi/erp5!1726

On the way to Zope 4, the biggest change was DateTime >= 3, which has these main differences:

 - `DateTime` instances are new style classes
 - `DateTime.__eq__` now take into the timezone into account
 - `DateTime` supports timezone naive ( https://docs.python.org/3/library/datetime.html#aware-and-naive-objects ) - actually this is since DateTime 2.12 , but since we fully patched the method where the parsing happens, ERP5's patched DateTime never used timezone naive dates.
 - pickles are also different.

These are changes to prepare ERP5 code base to support DateTime >= 3, while keeping compatibility with the previous behavior, this means that we keep patching to keep the same behavior as DateTime 2, so that `DateTime.__eq__` ignores timezone difference and `DateTime` does not support timezone naive dates - these two different behavior seemed to introduce too much breakages, especially in project code, with no immediate benefit for our usages. For now, while ERP5 is still based on Zope 2 / DateTime 2 the fact that DateTime are new style classes has no impact, this will only impact once we switch to Zope 4.

This also change the code to adjust the part where we were depending on implementation details of DateTime and where the details changed on DateTime 3, sometimes exposing higher level API, like the new `timeZoneContext` to use in tests.



See merge request !1593

See merge request nexedi/erp5!1725

See merge request !1726

use calendar module and public DateTime API instead.

This ensures that we don't break more.

We have code depending on these attributes, they were used in pattern
like this:

```py
try:
  DateTime(user_input)
except DateTime.DateError:
  error("invalid date")
```

so it's safer to keep the attributes for now, since we are already
patching a lot