- 09 Mar, 2023 11 commits
-
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
- 08 Mar, 2023 29 commits
-
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
also str representation of unicode character is different.
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Arnaud Fontaine authored
-
Kazuhiko Shiozaki authored
-
Jérome Perrin authored
The logic of the patch accidentally changed in 240a8d26 ( {,Propertied}User: Reduce the overhead from Developer role processing., 2019-02-14). This used to be a patch to not consider 'Developer' as a local role in SimpleUser.getRolesInContext , but it was changed to not consider 'Developer' role at all - also as a global role. SimpleUser are users from the the root acl_users, users from erp5/acl_users will typically be PropertiedUsers, because this is a PAS user folder.
-
Jérome Perrin authored
Call the original method instead of copy/pasting the code We still keep the following patches: - user: this is an ERP5 addition and maybe we use it in customer project code (if we don't I'm in favor of removing the feature, it's used in only one place in this repo) - call `self.changeSkin(self.portal.getCurrentSkinName())`. Maybe this is needed for CMFCore tests and could be good to send upstream, I did not check this part
-