Commit 034f0340 authored by Nick Thomas's avatar Nick Thomas

Don't use the redis set cache yet

For zero-downtime deployed in a mixed code environment between 12.2 and
12.3, the branch and tag name cache is incorrectly invalidated - a push
to an old machine will not clear the redis set version of the cache on
the new machine.

This commit ensures that, in 12.3, both set and non-set versions of the
cache are invalidated, but does not write or consult the set version of
the cache. . In 12.4, it will be safe to switch branch and tag names to
the redis set cache both it and the legacy cache will be invalidated
appropriately in such a mixed code environment.

This delays the full implementation of the feature by one release, but
in the absence of a credible feature-flagging strategy, and amidst an
abundance of caution about the effects of too-eager cache expiration, I
believe this is the best approach available to us.
parent 4cd6c91d
......@@ -239,13 +239,13 @@ class Repository
def branch_exists?(branch_name)
return false unless raw_repository
branch_names_include?(branch_name)
branch_names.include?(branch_name)
end
def tag_exists?(tag_name)
return false unless raw_repository
tag_names_include?(tag_name)
tag_names.include?(tag_name)
end
def ref_exists?(ref)
......@@ -569,10 +569,10 @@ class Repository
end
delegate :branch_names, to: :raw_repository
cache_method_as_redis_set :branch_names, fallback: []
cache_method :branch_names, fallback: []
delegate :tag_names, to: :raw_repository
cache_method_as_redis_set :tag_names, fallback: []
cache_method :tag_names, fallback: []
delegate :branch_count, :tag_count, :has_visible_content?, to: :raw_repository
cache_method :branch_count, fallback: 0
......
---
title: Cache branch and tag names as Redis sets
merge_request: 30476
author:
type: performance
......@@ -1223,66 +1223,36 @@ describe Repository do
end
describe '#branch_exists?' do
let(:branch) { repository.root_ref }
it 'uses branch_names' do
allow(repository).to receive(:branch_names).and_return(['foobar'])
subject { repository.branch_exists?(branch) }
it 'delegates to branch_names when the cache is empty' do
repository.expire_branches_cache
expect(repository).to receive(:branch_names).and_call_original
is_expected.to eq(true)
end
it 'uses redis set caching when the cache is filled' do
repository.branch_names # ensure the branch name cache is filled
expect(repository)
.to receive(:branch_names_include?)
.with(branch)
.and_call_original
is_expected.to eq(true)
expect(repository.branch_exists?('foobar')).to eq(true)
expect(repository.branch_exists?('master')).to eq(false)
end
end
describe '#tag_exists?' do
let(:tag) { repository.tags.first.name }
subject { repository.tag_exists?(tag) }
it 'delegates to tag_names when the cache is empty' do
repository.expire_tags_cache
expect(repository).to receive(:tag_names).and_call_original
is_expected.to eq(true)
end
it 'uses redis set caching when the cache is filled' do
repository.tag_names # ensure the tag name cache is filled
expect(repository)
.to receive(:tag_names_include?)
.with(tag)
.and_call_original
it 'uses tag_names' do
allow(repository).to receive(:tag_names).and_return(['foobar'])
is_expected.to eq(true)
expect(repository.tag_exists?('foobar')).to eq(true)
expect(repository.tag_exists?('master')).to eq(false)
end
end
describe '#branch_names', :clean_gitlab_redis_cache do
describe '#branch_names', :use_clean_rails_memory_store_caching do
let(:fake_branch_names) { ['foobar'] }
it 'gets cached across Repository instances' do
allow(repository.raw_repository).to receive(:branch_names).once.and_return(fake_branch_names)
expect(repository.branch_names).to match_array(fake_branch_names)
expect(repository.branch_names).to eq(fake_branch_names)
fresh_repository = Project.find(project.id).repository
expect(fresh_repository.object_id).not_to eq(repository.object_id)
expect(fresh_repository.raw_repository).not_to receive(:branch_names)
expect(fresh_repository.branch_names).to match_array(fake_branch_names)
expect(fresh_repository.branch_names).to eq(fake_branch_names)
end
end
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment