Skip to content
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Support
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
G
gitlab-ce
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Milestones
Merge Requests
1
Merge Requests
1
Analytics
Analytics
Repository
Value Stream
Wiki
Wiki
Snippets
Snippets
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
nexedi
gitlab-ce
Commits
be36b087
Commit
be36b087
authored
Jul 30, 2018
by
Robert Speicher
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
Resolve doc/administration/high_availability/nfs.md
parent
70e09d76
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
0 additions
and
16 deletions
+0
-16
doc/administration/high_availability/nfs.md
doc/administration/high_availability/nfs.md
+0
-16
No files found.
doc/administration/high_availability/nfs.md
View file @
be36b087
...
...
@@ -39,27 +39,11 @@ Our support team will not be able to assist on performance issues related to
file system access.
Customers and users have reported that AWS EFS does not perform well for GitLab's
<<<<<<< HEAD
use-case. There are several issues that can cause problems. For these reasons
GitLab does not recommend using EFS with GitLab.
-
EFS bases allowed IOPS on volume size. The larger the volume, the more IOPS
are allocated. For smaller volumes, users may experience decent performance
for a period of time due to 'Burst Credits'. Over a period of weeks to months
credits may run out and performance will bottom out.
-
For larger volumes, allocated IOPS may not be the problem. Workloads where
many small files are written in a serialized manner are not well-suited for EFS.
EBS with an NFS server on top will perform much better.
In addition, avoid storing GitLab log files (e.g. those in
`/var/log/gitlab`
)
because this will also affect performance. We recommend that the log files be
=======
use-case. Workloads where many small files are written in a serialized manner, like
`git`
,
are not well-suited for EFS. EBS with an NFS server on top will perform much better.
If you do choose to use EFS, avoid storing GitLab log files (e.g. those in
`/var/log/gitlab`
)
there because this will also affect performance. We recommend that the log files be
>>>>>>> upstream/master
stored on a local volume.
For more details on another person's experience with EFS, see
...
...
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment