Commit e3421799 authored by Evan Read's avatar Evan Read

Merge branch 'docs-followup-32537' into 'master'

Resolve docs follow-up with issue links

Closes #32537

See merge request gitlab-org/gitlab!17567
parents 534c6031 96fc144c
......@@ -202,7 +202,9 @@ These reference architecture examples rely on the general rule that approximatel
- **Supported Users (approximate):** 10,000
- **RPS:** 200 requests per second
- **Known Issues:** While validating the reference architecture, slow endpoints were discovered and are being investigated. [gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/64335](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/64335)
- **Known Issues:** While validating the reference architecture, slow API endpoints
were discovered. For details, see the related issues list in
[this issue](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-foss/issues/64335).
The Support and Quality teams built, performance tested, and validated an
environment that supports about 10,000 users. The specifications below are a
......@@ -225,7 +227,7 @@ NOTE: **Note:** The specifications here were performance tested against a specif
- **Supported Users (approximate):** 25,000
- **RPS:** 500 requests per second
- **Status:** Work-in-progress
- **Related Issues:** [gitlab-org/quality/performance/issues/57](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/quality/performance/issues/57)
- **Related Issue:** See the [related issue](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/quality/performance/issues/57) for more information.
The Support and Quality teams are in the process of building and performance testing
an environment that will support about 25,000 users. The specifications below
......@@ -240,7 +242,7 @@ TBD: Add specs
- **Supported Users (approximate):** 50,000
- **RPS:** 1,000 requests per second
- **Status:** Work-in-progress
- **Related Issues:** [gitlab-org/quality/performance/issues/66](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/quality/performance/issues/66)
- **Related Issue:** See the [related issue](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/quality/performance/issues/66) for more information.
The Support and Quality teams are in the process of building and performance testing
an environment that will support about 50,000 users. The specifications below
......
......@@ -708,7 +708,7 @@ After deploying the configuration follow these steps:
This example uses 3 PostgreSQL servers, and 1 application node.
It differs from the [recommended setup](#example-recommended-setup) by moving the Consul servers into the same servers we use for PostgreSQL.
The trade-off is between reducing server counts, against the increased operational complexity of needing to deal with postgres [failover](#failover-procedure) and [restore](#restore-procedure) procedures in addition to [Consul outage recovery](consul.md#outage-recovery) on the same set of machines.
The trade-off is between reducing server counts, against the increased operational complexity of needing to deal with PostgreSQL [failover](#failover-procedure) and [restore](#restore-procedure) procedures in addition to [Consul outage recovery](consul.md#outage-recovery) on the same set of machines.
In this example we start with all servers on the same 10.6.0.0/16 private network range, they can connect to each freely other on those addresses.
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment