Because of missing validations in the projects model, you could
create a new project with a nil or empty import_url with mirror=true.
This would cause exceptions when
RepositoryUpdateMirrorWorker::UpdateMirrorError ran and attempted to
update one of these projects. This was made easier by the fact that
you could show the "Mirror repository" checkbox in the UI, check it,
hide it, and still have its value considered.

The missing validations have been added, and minor adjustments have
been made to the UI to improve the previous behaviour. A migration
was also added to update mirror=false in all projects with a nil or
empty import url that exists because of the described bug.

Refactor the license documentaiton

Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/1000

See merge request !730

Request only the LDAP attributes we need

## What does this MR do?

It includes CE changes from https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6187 to reduce the chance of merge conflicts since lots of stuff moved around. 

Fixes gitlab-org/gitlab-ce#13821. For LDAP users, we really only ever need uid, dn, cn, and mail attributes, and in some cases, even less. For LDAP groups we need ..... This merge request strips the request down to the minimum needed by default, and allows the caller to specify more or less, if needed. 

## Why was this MR needed?

This will improve performance especially in cases where the connection is slow between GitLab and LDAP, or when the LDAP object has lots of attributes we don't care about.

See merge request !712

Fix: Elasticsearch does not find partial matches in project names

Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/960

See merge request !726

Reduce UPDATE queries when moving between import states on projects

See merge request !723

Fix spec in master

Fixes failed builds such as https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/builds/3919501

cherry-picked form https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6291

See merge request !728

Fixes failed builds such as https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/builds/3919501

Add update guide for 8.12 CE to EE.

[ci skip]

See merge request !706

By changing our logic from `before_transition` to `after_transition`
blocks and removing extra calls to `update` or `save` we can do all
changes in a single UPDATE query (currently each transition change
from started -> failed and started -> finished runs two UPDATE
queries each)

Instrument more ES-related code

See merge request !721

repository_mirroring: update menu entry to "Mirror Repository"

Instead of "Repository Mirroring" it looks like the menu name to configure mirroring is now called "Mirror Repository".

See merge request !724

Minor update on CI docs examples

cc @ayufan @markpundsack 

Commit message: 

> Triggered by gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-yml#1 I've investigated how this is
organized so far and did a minor clean up. In my opinion we should just
keep a list of up to date blog posts in the docs and examples should be
included in gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-yml. This reduces the number of
projects and docs pages one has to look for information.

See merge request !5806

Security and safety improvements for gitlab-workhorse integration

Companion to https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-workhorse/merge_requests/60

- Use a custom content type when sending data to gitlab-workhorse
- Verify (using JWT and a shared secret on disk) that internal API requests came from gitlab-workhorse

This will allow us to build features in gitlab-workhorse that require
more trust, and protect us against programming mistakes in the future.

This is designed so that no action is required for installations from
source. For omnibus-gitlab we need to add code that manages the shared
secret.

See merge request !5907

Fix intermittent spec failures with spec/features/issues/user_uses_slash_commands_spec.rb

This MR solves the intermittent spec failure:

```
 1) Issues > User uses slash commands behaves like issuable record that supports slash commands in its description and notes note on issue with a note changing the issue's title when current user cannot change title of issue does not reopen the issue
     Failure/Error: Gitlab::Routing.url_helpers.namespace_project_url(self.namespace, self)

     ActionController::UrlGenerationError:
       No route matches {:action=>"show", :controller=>"projects", :id=>#<Project id: 1, name: "project135", path: "gitlabhq", description: nil, created_at: "2016-08-31 20:45:48", updated_at: "2016-08-31 20:45:48", creator_id: 2, issues_enabled: true, merge_requests_enabled: true, wiki_enabled: true, namespace_id: 2, snippets_enabled: true, last_activity_at: "2016-08-31 20:45:48", import_url: nil, visibility_level: 20, archived: false, avatar: nil, import_status: "none", repository_size: 0.0, star_count: 0, import_type: nil, import_source: nil, commit_count: 0, import_error: nil, ci_id: nil, builds_enabled: true, shared_runners_enabled: true, runners_token: "_rNZHgsHzaDWGbyL3L2F", build_coverage_regex: nil, build_allow_git_fetch: true, build_timeout: 3600, pending_delete: false, public_builds: true, pushes_since_gc: 0, last_repository_check_failed: nil, last_repository_check_at: nil, container_registry_enabled: true, only_allow_merge_if_build_succeeds: false, has_external_issue_tracker: false, repository_storage: "default", request_access_enabled: true, has_external_wiki: false, lfs_enabled: nil>, :namespace_id=>nil} missing required keys: [:namespace_id]
     Shared Example Group: "issuable record that supports slash commands in its description and notes" called from ./spec/features/issues/user_uses_slash_commands_spec.rb:6
     # ./app/models/project.rb:611:in `web_url'
     # ./app/models/project.rb:975:in `hook_attrs'
     # ./lib/gitlab/data_builder/note.rb:58:in `build_base_data'
     # ./lib/gitlab/data_builder/note.rb:38:in `build'
     # ./app/services/notes/post_process_service.rb:19:in `hook_data'
     # ./app/services/notes/post_process_service.rb:23:in `execute_note_hooks'
     # ./app/services/notes/post_process_service.rb:14:in `execute'
     # ./app/workers/new_note_worker.rb:10:in `perform'
     # ./app/services/notes/create_service.rb:29:in `execute'
     # ./app/controllers/projects/notes_controller.rb:26:in `create'
     # ./lib/gitlab/request_profiler/middleware.rb:15:in `call'
     # ./lib/gitlab/middleware/go.rb:16:in `call'
     # ./lib/gitlab/middleware/static.rb:9:in `call'
```

There were a number of issues:
    
1. Sidekiq async tasks were being run after project namespaces were deleted. Use Sidekiq in fake mode to prevent this from Sidekiq tasks from being enqueued in the first place.
2. Some outstanding Ajax requests (e.g. autocomplete) were still being loaded while `DatabaseCleaner` ran
3. `logout` did not always wait for logout actually to complete
  
Closes #21723

See merge request !6271

Triggered by gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-yml#1 I've investigated how this is
organized so far and did a minor clean up. In my opinion we should just
keep a list of up to date blog posts in the docs and examples should be
included in gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-yml. This reduces the number of
projects and docs pages one has to look for information.

[ci skip]

Refresh todos count cache when an Issue/MR is deleted

Fixes #21714

See merge request !6161

* Moves splitting of  `ps` result to helper.
* Users a regexp to extract the different parts

The result of `ps` at least depends on the _LANG_ and the distance of
_start_ to _now_ (start time then the day + hour then month+day)
I've tested with _LANG=en_US.UTF-8_ and _LANG=de_CH.UTF-8_

Closes #20632

See merge request !6245

Sidekiq async tasks were being run after project namespaces were deleted. Use
Sidekiq in fake mode to prevent this from Sidekiq tasks from being enqueued
in the first place.

Closes #21723

CE upstream



See merge request !720

Give project selection dropdowns responsive width, long names wrap.

## What does this MR do?

Makes two dropdown menus (branch name selector & project selector) wider on larger screens, and allows their contents to wrap.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

Sanity check. 

## Why was this MR needed?

Considered a regression, as users who relied on long branch names could no longer see them fully. 

## Screenshots (if relevant)

Before: 
![Screen_Shot_2016-08-30_at_2.50.43_PM](/uploads/e0252cb02c5f34f3c777d2d67028042f/Screen_Shot_2016-08-30_at_2.50.43_PM.png)

After:
![Screen_Shot_2016-08-30_at_2.49.35_PM](/uploads/b504e0f3e139c85699bc5aafb58199f3/Screen_Shot_2016-08-30_at_2.49.35_PM.png)

After (updated after fixes, including project selector): 

![Screen_Shot_2016-09-02_at_1.46.53_PM](/uploads/b480fc8193f713ce43518cb83886fd52/Screen_Shot_2016-09-02_at_1.46.53_PM.png)

![Screen_Shot_2016-09-02_at_1.50.26_PM](/uploads/f0d31702668e83e6c0c24782cc43fdbd/Screen_Shot_2016-09-02_at_1.50.26_PM.png)
## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [x] API support added
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Closes #15633

See merge request !6105

Smartly calculate real running time and pending time

## What does this MR do?

Try to smartly calculate the running time and pending time for pipelines, instead of just use wall clock time from start to end. The algorithm is based on:

> Suppose we have A, B, and C jobs:

> * A: from 1 to 3
> * B: from 2 to 4
> * C: from 6 to 7

> The processing time should be accumulated from 1 to 4, and 6 to 7, totally 4, excluding retires, and calculate on `%w[success failed running canceled]` jobs (if a job is not finished yet, assume it's `Time.now`)

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

I would actually like to test `Gitlab::Ci::PipelineDuration#process_segments`, but it's a private method right now and it's not very convenient to test it. Is there a way to test it without changing the original code too much? Note that I would like to avoid saving merged segments because it's not used and should be garbage collected.

## Screenshots:

![Screen_Shot_2016-09-05_at_6.45.32_PM](/uploads/a82bfaf316661091e383b743a2f11334/Screen_Shot_2016-09-05_at_6.45.32_PM.png)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Closes #18260, #19804

See merge request !6084

Implement Slack integration for pipeline hooks

## What does this MR do?

Add pipeline events to Slack integration

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug

See merge request !5525