- 24 Jun, 2016 13 commits
-
-
Stan Hu authored
Closes #19133 [ci skip]
-
Stan Hu authored
Closes #19132 [ci skip]
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
Update default regexp documentation to match reality The regexp was updated in 8172d2c1 but this was stale. See merge request !4866
-
Rémy Coutable authored
-
Yorick Peterse authored
Added changelog entry for redacting improvements See merge request !4896
-
Yorick Peterse authored
[ci skip]
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Fix temp file being deleted after the request while importing a GitLab project Fixes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/infrastructure/issues/151 In production, the temporary uploaded file is getting deleted straight after the request so the Sidekiq worker is unable to find it in `/tmp` Also, improved erroring/logging of this situation. See merge request !4894
-
Yorick Peterse authored
Support for rendering/redacting multiple documents See merge request !4828
-
Yorick Peterse authored
This commit changes the way certain documents are rendered (currently only Notes) and how documents are redacted. Previously both rendering and redacting would run on a per document basis. The result of this was that for every document we'd have to run countless queries just to figure out if we could display a set of links or not. This commit changes things around so that redacting Markdown documents is no longer tied into the html-pipeline Gem. This in turn allows it to redact multiple documents in a single pass, thus reducing the number of queries needed. In turn rendering issue/merge request notes has been adjusted to take advantage of this new setup. Instead of rendering Markdown somewhere deep down in a view the Markdown is rendered and redacted in the controller (taking the current user and all that into account). This has been done in such a way that the "markdown()" helper method can still be used on its own. This particular commit also paves the way for caching rendered HTML on object level. Right now there's an accessor method Note#note_html which is used for setting/getting the rendered HTML. Once we cache HTML on row level we can simply change this field to be a column and call a "save" whenever needed and we're pretty much done.
-
James Lopez authored
-
James Lopez authored
Fix tmp file being deleted after the request plus some cleanup and improved erroring for this situation
-
Stan Hu authored
Fix settings_spec so that it can that run by itself Running `spec/settings_spec.rb` would fail because it would attempt to load `1_settings.rb`, which would reference `Rails`. This constant was not loaded without `spec_helper.rb`. See merge request !4893
-
Stan Hu authored
-
- 23 Jun, 2016 27 commits
-
-
Robert Speicher authored
Replace Haml with Hamlit What this change does: - It replaces HAML with [Hamlit](https://github.com/k0kubun/hamlit), a much more efficient implementation of HAML. - It removes `haml-rails`. - It adds `hamlit.rb` and removes `haml.rb`. - It makes things faster and less memory-hungry! See also #13201. See merge request !3666
-
Douwe Maan authored
-
Jacob Schatz authored
Remove width restriction for logo on sign-in page. Follow-up on !4661 since we didn't remove the width restriction on that. See merge request !4888
-
Jacob Schatz authored
Resolve "Scrolling horz on iOS for the secondary nav is broken" ## What does this MR do? Moves absolutely positioned `div`s outside of the scrolling container because mobile safari causes those elements to jump around on scroll. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Check on a real iPhone (was only able to check in iOS simulator) ## Why was this MR needed? Mobile Safari. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #18438 ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![mobile-safari-fix](/uploads/b38bba735530eb11507fe03036292dd8/mobile-safari-fix.gif) See merge request !4869
-
Connor Shea authored
-
Connor Shea authored
-
Jacob Schatz authored
Apply selected value as label ## What does this MR do? ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? ## What are the relevant issue numbers? ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![dropdown-label](/uploads/db2ea7cb3cc51fbdeea53c304f1bd7a5/dropdown-label.gif) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !4886
-
Jacob Schatz authored
Fix unwanted label unassignment ## What does this MR do? - When updating the milestone - [x] Do not remove labels when assigning a milestone - [x] Do not remove labels when unassigning a milestone - [x] Do not remove labels when assigning a milestone and adding another label - When toggling selected issues labels should be kept - [x] Select an issue with an assigned label -> pick another label from dropdown-> unselect the issue -> select the issue again -> submit the form: Existing label should not be removed. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Labels should not be added or removed to issues when doing bulk actions unless we explicitly select a label from the dropdown ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !4863
-
Annabel Dunstone authored
-
Annabel Dunstone authored
-
Annabel Dunstone authored
-
Annabel Dunstone authored
-
Jacob Schatz authored
Set button label when picking an option from status dropdown ## What does this MR do? Fixes an issue with the status dropdown. It was not setting up the correct label after picking an option ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/18536 ## Screenshots (if relevant) **Previous** ![status-select-previous](/uploads/7c6adbd6c5ba2660dc39a762d53d3b68/status-select-previous.gif) **After** ![status-select](/uploads/91483efed8fbd63a79a01c9ca2154b74/status-select.gif) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - [ ] Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !4771
-
Jacob Schatz authored
Use jQuery objects in ref dropdown ## What does this MR do? Keeps the behaviour the same as the ref dropdown, however it now uses jQuery objects to handle the HTML creation instead of passing strings around. It pretty much worked out the box so not much was changed in the dropdowns themselves. Will be easy to transfer this over to other dropdown menus as well. cc. @jschatz1 @rspeicher @DouweM Do we want this to go into a patch release? See merge request !4850
-
Yorick Peterse authored
Eager load award emoji on notes and participants See merge request !4628
-
Robert Speicher authored
Restore old behavior around diff notes to outdated discussions Fixes #18569 See merge request !4870
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
-
Stan Hu authored
Bump gitlab_git to 10.2.3 to fix false truncated warnings with ISO-8559 files Closes #18690 See merge request !4884
-
Stan Hu authored
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
Added basic docs for the Emoji Rake tasks ## What does this MR do? This MR adds basic documentation for the two Emoji Rake tasks. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Spelling, that sort of thing. ## Why was this MR needed? These Rake tasks only had some small amount of source level documentation. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/14794 ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] ~~[CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added~~ - [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !4877
-
Paco Guzman authored
-
Z.J. van de Weg authored
This commit eager loads the award emoji on both the issues and the MRs. When loading an issue with 108 comments this reduces the query count by 327 queries. On a merge request with the same amount of comments this saves 148 queries. The large difference is not clear to me at this point and the total query count is still huge with 387 and 1034 respectively. The biggest problem however, remains the calculation of participants.
-