Merge branch '24908-install-instructions-seem-to-have-two-database-steps-out-of-order' into 'master'

Fix documentation to create the `pg_trm` extension before creating the DB

Closes #24908

See merge request !7735

Add missing documentation.

## What does this MR do?

Add documentation to Build events on webhooks

See merge request !7717

Add default_branch attr to Project API payload in docs.

See merge request !7726

Document that we always use `do...end` for `before` in RSpec

[ci skip]

See merge request !7697

Add missing JIRA file that redirects to the new location

See merge request !7736

[ci skip]

[ci skip]
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>

[ci skip]
Signed-off-by: Rémy Coutable <remy@rymai.me>

Backport Note#commands_changes from EE

One small thing from https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/merge_requests/870 that was missed in https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/7604.

/cc @rdavila

See merge request !7730

Log mv_namespace parameters

[ci skip]

See merge request !7729

Add nested groups support to the routing

## What does this MR do?

It allows routing with `/` in namespace name 

## Why was this MR needed?

For nested groups feature(https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/2772). We need URI like `/group/subgroup/project` be routed correctly


## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- ~~[Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)~~
- ~~API support added~~
- Tests
  - [x] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/2772

See merge request !7459

Move admin abuse report spinach test to RSpec

https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23036

See merge request !7691

Simplify copy on "Create a new list" dropdown in Issue Boards

## What does this MR do?

It changes the "Create new list" text to simply "Add list". It also describes the operation in a more concise way. It was suggested in #24659.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

Although I refactored references to the name of the button to reflect the new text, I left part of the documentation unmodified:

File: `doc/user/project/issue_board.md`
```
In short, here's a list of actions you can take in an Issue Board:                 
                                                                                   
- [Create a new list](#creating-a-new-list).                                       
- [Delete an existing list](#deleting-a-list). 
```
because I was not sure if changing those was necessary.


Additionally, I replaced every occurrence of `click_button 'Create new list'` with `click_button 'Add list'`in the spec. I'm not sure if that causes any change in behavior as I am not sure if there are any hooks to the previous name, explicitly.

File: `spec/features/boards/boards_spec.rb`

## Why was this MR needed?

It is an improvement, as suggested in #24659

## Screenshots (if relevant)

**Before:**
![before](/uploads/cffd30b0e9a21d16bc25d046eb4ca42b/before.png)

**After:**
![after2](/uploads/95b049e0c1c565c4ccd1a72a3f4be925/after2.png)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [X] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [X] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [X] All builds are passing
- [X] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [X] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [X] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [X] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
#24659

See merge request !7605

Move abuse report spinach test to RSpec

https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23036

See merge request !7659

Remove heading ids from University docs

Having ids in headings was preventing the ToC to render correctly

See merge request !7720

[ci skip]

Fix `LFS enabled` select box.

A refactor of the project edit page caused the `lfs_enabled` setting to be reverted to a non functioning state. This MR fixes that.

This will most likely need to be ported back to 8.13 and 8.14. 8.12 contained the correct code.

Fixes #24645 

Related commits:

- ea3bbbde
- da07c2e4

cc @stanhu @dblessing @dbalexandre @rymai

See merge request !7716

Build was being triggered but there was no documentation about it, so
I'm adding what I was receiving from webhooks when implementing the
Rocketchat integration (https://github.com/PotHix/rocketchat-gitlab-hook).

Use Commit#author so we share logic and cache

See merge request !7715

It was not displaying the proper value and had an out of place look to it.

Closes #24900

move timeago.js to vendor directory

## What does this MR do?

moves timeago.js into `/vendor/assets/javascripts` for consistency with other external javascript libraries.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

make sure timeago still works as it should...?  I don't see how this could have broken anything.

## Why was this MR needed?

consistency with our guidelines

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- Tests
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

See discussion in [!6274](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/6274#note_18625583)

See merge request !7590

fixes non-retina shadow and browser zoom issue

## What does this MR do?
This MR closes #24851 and shadow issue for browser zoom 

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
NR

## Screenshots (if relevant)
**Ratina Display:**
![normal](/uploads/18fb0e321eff55cb89413745413cfe8a/normal.png)

**Non Retina**
![non-retina](/uploads/85ce8d3b22a025c251142bebe30c4401/non-retina.png)

**110% zoom**
![ratina](/uploads/bc0f2468ba780998e0e2b60a6d07e8db/ratina.png)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [ ] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?


Closes #24851

See merge request !7712

Use default `closest` if available!

## What does this MR do?

We should use the default `Element.prototype.closest` if its available.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

## Why was this MR needed?

## Screenshots (if relevant)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [ ] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

See merge request !7706

Fixed dragging issues on issue boards

## What does this MR do?

This fixes a few issues all at once:

- Fixes an issue when dragging an issue to a list but actually removes another issue from the original list
- Fixes an issue that caused the issue card to be appended to the bottom of the list
- Fixes an issue when dragging an issue would actually open up the sidebar

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Closes #24654

See merge request !7701

https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/23036