- 02 Sep, 2016 8 commits
-
-
Valery Sizov authored
-
Valery Sizov authored
-
Valery Sizov authored
-
Phil Hughes authored
-
Valery Sizov authored
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
Change the inline code to codeblocks for the new features doc guideline Change the inline code to codeblocks for the new features doc guideline for better clarity. See merge request !6168
-
Achilleas Pipinellis authored
[ci skip]
-
Valery Sizov authored
Port policies to EE Ports https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5796 to EE, maintaining EE-only differences. Assuming this all works, I think we should put this block in CE as well just to prevent future conflicts: ```ruby # EE-only if defined?(License) && License.block_changes? cannot! :create_issue cannot! :create_merge_request cannot! :push_code cannot! :push_code_to_protected_branches end ``` In addition to cherry-picking the gitlab-org/gitlab-ce@e71cd7a300017cf85e16de3b1c68fdb25c3a4b4d commit, which is the merge of the Policy refactor itself, I had to cherry-pick gitlab-org/gitlab-ce@6686084c6502f10fd7e6b8963ab52526cb6831bf because it added the `Project#has_wiki?` method that specs depended on. See merge request !702
-
- 01 Sep, 2016 32 commits
-
-
Stan Hu authored
Update CHANGELOG with 8.11.4 entries. See merge request !6159
-
Ruben Davila authored
-
Fatih Acet authored
Remove inconsistent font weight for sidebar's labels ## What does this MR do? Removes the `.bold` css class from the sidebar label default value so that it is no longer bold
😄 **None** => None ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? None ## Why was this MR needed? Fixes a UI inconsistency ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #21141 ## Screenshots (if relevant) Before: ![Screen_Shot_2016-08-24_at_9.41.11_AM](/uploads/3e416d45531b7322474922c569225c03/Screen_Shot_2016-08-24_at_9.41.11_AM.png) After: ![Screen_Shot_2016-08-24_at_9.40.57_AM](/uploads/a4d60d4cd0a57142ad6c0c8a25be5342/Screen_Shot_2016-08-24_at_9.40.57_AM.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - Tests - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5984 -
Fatih Acet authored
Fix inconsistent checkbox alignment ## What does this MR do? Vertically aligns the checkboxes to the top so that it is aligned with the issue titles ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? None ## Why was this MR needed? Fixes existing UI inconsistency ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #21398 ## Screenshots (if relevant) Before: ![Screen_Shot_2016-08-25_at_12.43.21_PM](/uploads/c494d6200e2068feb324db932851cdc0/Screen_Shot_2016-08-25_at_12.43.21_PM.png) After: ![Screen_Shot_2016-08-25_at_12.41.51_PM](/uploads/42241a150c886592ff92a5840090c589/Screen_Shot_2016-08-25_at_12.41.51_PM.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - Tests - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !6032
-
Fatih Acet authored
Front End - Rewrote ES5 `user.js` to ES6 `user.js.es6` ## What does this MR do? This MR removes the `users.js` file in `app/assets/javascripts/users.js` and replaces it with ES6. * It also adds the file extension `.es6` so that the sprockets babel gem can transpile it to ES5. * The new file is: `users.js.es6` in `app/assets/javascripts/` * Replaced `new User` with `new gl.User` in `app/views/users/show.html.haml` ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? I followed the AirBnb guide, but if there are any mistakes let me know! ## Why was this MR needed? Because the entire coffee script codebase was transferred over to ES5 with a plan to move everything over to ES6
😄 ## What are the relevant issue numbers? #20098 ## Screenshots (if relevant) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - Tests - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5676 -
Fatih Acet authored
Add the total number of issues in the JSON response in issue board lists ## What does this MR do? Add the total number of issues in the JSON response in issue board lists ## Why was this MR needed? The issue board lists should always show the total number of issues in the list, not the current amount fetched by endless scroll. Closes #21327 See merge request !5904
-
Stan Hu authored
Remove (unreleased) for 8.11.3 See merge request !703
-
Ruben Davila authored
-
Regis authored
-
Robert Speicher authored
-
Fatih Acet authored
Change widths of content in MR pipeline tab ## What does this MR do? * Fixes width of items in pipelines tab * Removes scrollbars on Windows ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![Screen_Shot_2016-09-01_at_2.40.55_PM](/uploads/2163022eb325b9b0eca2f2003416e100/Screen_Shot_2016-09-01_at_2.40.55_PM.png) #### What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #21396 Closes #21781 See merge request !6157
-
Fatih Acet authored
Merge branch '21508-inconsistency-personal-dashboard-todos-page-uses-old-interface-wrong-dropdown-filter-buttons' into 'master' Update todo view filter dropdowns ## What does this MR do? Swaps out old `select2` dropdowns on todo page with newer dropdowns. Also removes todo inline JS. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? ## Screenshots (if relevant) ### Project ![2016-08-29_14.02.57](/uploads/73d610fd41d202540f3770afa7e5266f/2016-08-29_14.02.57.gif) ### Author ![2016-08-29_14.03.40](/uploads/8ce97b81c91db06111f6a930cd5fb293/2016-08-29_14.03.40.gif) ### Type ![2016-08-29_14.04.32](/uploads/1aa050a7822de1d99ee7fdc3bbc621a3/2016-08-29_14.04.32.gif) ### Action ![2016-08-29_14.05.23](/uploads/680d19c56723a222274c3677f941cfcd/2016-08-29_14.05.23.gif) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #21508 Related to #19866 See merge request !6072
-
Annabel Dunstone Gray authored
Remove prefixes from transition CSS property ## What does this MR do? Removes vendor prefixes from the CSS transition property ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? None ## Why was this MR needed? Reduces unnecessary CSS ## Screenshots (if relevant) None ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - Tests - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #21614 See merge request !6093
-
Fatih Acet authored
Add curve to generic commit status pipeline #### What does this MR do? Add curve to generic commit status pipeline #### Screenshots (if relevant) Before: ![Screen_Shot_2016-09-01_at_1.35.29_PM](/uploads/e4585462d50d426bcad66ae571387ddc/Screen_Shot_2016-09-01_at_1.35.29_PM.png) After: ![Screen_Shot_2016-09-01_at_1.35.21_PM](/uploads/fe62a7e5fc27c9c1bb3553fdc63c5cc6/Screen_Shot_2016-09-01_at_1.35.21_PM.png) See merge request !6156
-
Douwe Maan authored
Enable Ruby 2.3 for rubocop too See merge request !6153
-
Annabel Dunstone authored
-
Alejandro Rodríguez authored
-
Yorick Peterse authored
Optimize branch lookups and force a repository reload for Repository#find_branch See merge request !6087
-
Robert Speicher authored
Refactor ability.rb into Policies Factors out `ability.rb` into a new abstraction - the "policy" (stored in `app/policies`). A policy is a class named `#{class_name}Policy` (looked up automatically as needed) that implements `rules` as follows: ``` ruby class ThingPolicy < BasePolicy def rules @user # this is a user to determine abilities for, optionally nil in the anonymous case @subject # this is the subject of the ability, guaranteed to be an instance of `Thing` can! :some_ability # grant the :some_ability permission cannot! :some_ability # ensure that :some_ability is not allowed. this overrides any `can!` that is called before or after delegate! @subject.other_thing # merge the abilities (can!) and prohibitions (cannot!) from `@subject.other_thing` can? :some_ability # test whether, so far, :some_ability is allowed end def anonymous_rules # optional. if not implemented `rules` is called where `@user` is nil. otherwise this method is called when `@user` is nil. end end ``` See merge request !5796
-
Robert Speicher authored
Some minor updates to upgrade guides for 8.12. See merge request !6154
-
Annabel Dunstone authored
-
Z.J. van de Weg authored
-
Annabel Dunstone Gray authored
Resolve "Inconsistency: Repo Title "down caret" cropped on smaller viewports" ## What does this MR do? Fixes an issue where the dropdown chevron for a project list was not visible on smaller viewports. This MR also changes the dropdown trigger into a `button` element for better accessibility (it can now be tabbed to like any link). ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? None that I can think of. ## Why was this MR needed? Better accessibility and support for smaller viewports. ## Screenshots (if relevant) Dropdown toggle now targetable by pressing tab to select. ![Screen_Shot_2016-08-31_at_9.12.15_PM](/uploads/8b2038a8ae259efd32da2e94a309ce88/Screen_Shot_2016-08-31_at_9.12.15_PM.png) Chevron no longer hidden when project title length triggers `overflow: ellipsis`. ![Screen_Shot_2016-08-31_at_9.13.38_PM](/uploads/382e76c06e54bc307106a84ec21ab892/Screen_Shot_2016-08-31_at_9.13.38_PM.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] CHANGELOG entry added - Tests - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #21506 See merge request !6140
-
Ruben Davila authored
-
Annabel Dunstone Gray authored
Replace play icon font with svg ## What does this MR do? Replaces the `play` font awesome icon with svg ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Make sure that the svg is looking great on all the changed pages ## Why was this MR needed? SVG is better than fonts
😄 ## What are the relevant issue numbers? #21455 ## Screenshots (if relevant) Before (Pipeline): ![Screen_Shot_2016-08-26_at_4.16.16_PM](/uploads/90a75b91b516e643f2134e053b0d7590/Screen_Shot_2016-08-26_at_4.16.16_PM.png) After (Pipeline): ![Screen_Shot_2016-08-26_at_4.15.49_PM](/uploads/44e44a3d4c14066b8b7ec8c3da36e012/Screen_Shot_2016-08-26_at_4.15.49_PM.png) Before (Environments): ![Screen_Shot_2016-08-31_at_3.03.35_PM](/uploads/bd4087a9f01c1a4d3c373d2662df4fe5/Screen_Shot_2016-08-31_at_3.03.35_PM.png) After (Environments): ![Screen_Shot_2016-08-31_at_3.00.23_PM](/uploads/0ec45031bedb271f16bea3544cbfe52b/Screen_Shot_2016-08-31_at_3.00.23_PM.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - Tests - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !6038 -
Annabel Dunstone Gray authored
Center build stage columns in pipeline overview ## What does this MR do? Centers the build stage table content and headers in the [pipeline view](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/pipelines) ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Need to check whether it is okay to remove the following ([commit that added this property](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/commit/6130376ad6673facb729b78878f9156a29948a5b)) ``` .light { width: 3px; } ``` ## Why was this MR needed? Improve UI ## Screenshots (if relevant) Before: ![Screen_Shot_2016-08-31_at_12.46.43_PM](/uploads/cc4973d2155b59b32ec6fde714fbc26d/Screen_Shot_2016-08-31_at_12.46.43_PM.png) After: ![Screen_Shot_2016-08-31_at_12.46.28_PM](/uploads/561d7b3973398c827d88870b38136c7d/Screen_Shot_2016-08-31_at_12.46.28_PM.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - Tests - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #21708 See merge request !6135
-
Clement Ho authored
-
Clement Ho authored
-
Douwe Maan authored
Project tools visibility level ## part of #19734 ![project_features_access_level](/uploads/81ec7185d4e61d7578652020209af925/project_features_access_level.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [x] API support added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5606
-
Douwe Maan authored
Merge request sha info ## What does this MR do? Exposes `sha` and `merge_commit_sha` items in `MergeRequest` API endpoint data. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? No. ## Why was this MR needed? It's useful information. ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #20456. ## Screenshots (if relevant) N/A ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [x] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [x] API support added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) See merge request !5966
-
Felipe Artur authored
-
Robert Speicher authored
Hide group control nav if no options present Taken from https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/merge_requests/5155 See merge request !701
-