Add shortcuts for adding users to a project team with a specific role

This also updates _some_ specs to use these new methods, just to serve
as an example for others going forward, but by no means is this
exhaustive.

Original implementations at !5992 and !6012.

Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/20944

See merge request !888

This also updates _some_ specs to use these new methods, just to serve
as an example for others going forward, but by no means is this
exhaustive.

Original implementations at !5992 and !6012.

Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/20944

[ci skip]

[ci skip]

Fix: MergeRequestSerializer breaks on  when source_project doesn't exist anymore

Closes #1289

See merge request !903

Move repository update mirror jobs to project_mirror Sidekiq jobs

See merge request !900

CE upstream

See merge request !902

update

Backport SmartInterval, PrettyTime, SubbableResource from EE.

## What does this MR do?

Backports infrastructure used for EE-only Timetracking so it can be used and improved upon in CE. 

This doesn't really need review... it was already reviewed and merged in EE. 

There are no side effects or conflicts, just three new classes added:

1. `SubbableResource` -- pubsub for ajax resources
2. `SmartInterval`-- for configurable polling
3. `PrettyTime` -- time parsing and formatting utility methods

- [x] Added for this feature/bug
- [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/985

https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/merge_requests/870

cc: @jschatz1

See merge request !7573

Restricted visibility buttons to checkboxes

## What does this MR do?

Changes the `Restricted visibility levels` settings to use checkboxes instead of a button group.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

## Why was this MR needed?

## Screenshots (if relevant)

![Screen_Shot_2016-11-14_at_19.25.48](/uploads/0c6ee415ee0c89c0a7e3ffd98f88df71/Screen_Shot_2016-11-14_at_19.25.48.png)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [x] All builds are passing
- [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?


Closes #18136

See merge request !7463

Issues empty state

## What does this MR do?

Adds the empty state for the project, dashboard and group issues.

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

## Why was this MR needed?

## Screenshots (if relevant)

### Filtered to show no issues (on group issues page in this case but also dashboard and projects)

![Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.55.56](/uploads/b598af4a8a5e2c9fbb859abf36e70e4b/Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.55.56.png)

### Project with no issues

![Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.57.08](/uploads/8f54fdf1b3101c46299249fa2944207d/Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.57.08.png)

![Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.57.17](/uploads/1d2d162e1d845dd05e945d8ebb1d2101/Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.57.17.png)

### Group with no projects with any issues

![Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.54.55](/uploads/f28dc2038839d5bda0eb37f37927d5db/Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.54.55.png)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [ ] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?


Closes #20840 

Closes #20850

See merge request !7309

Cycle analytics second iteration frontend

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?
Mostly typos and code guidelines.

## Why was this MR needed?
This implements the frontend part of !6859 for #23449

## Screenshots

**Initial view**
![Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_5.28.43_PM](/uploads/ff9cfa9c9d6c2da28c24e03e384f89af/Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_5.28.43_PM.png)

**Cycle Analytics with data**
![Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_2.09.24_PM](/uploads/18d9786c090bdd554cf786c879543302/Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_2.09.24_PM.png)

**User doesn't have access for a stage**
![Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_2.11.01_PM](/uploads/d1ea76a63f2de2224954b5f40038c488/Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_2.11.01_PM.png)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?
Closes #23449

See merge request !7366

This is not the nicest solution since it duplicates some logic from CE's
"perform" method, but it's the best solution for now.

Make milestone page responsive

Credit to @yury-n for this one. ⭐ 🌟 ⭐  Original MR: !5255

## What does this MR do?

> Makes the milestone page more mobile friendly

## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check?

> Shouldn't be but maybe double check that the views I changed are exclusively used by the milestone details page I was amending and not any other pages that I haven't tested after my changes.

Looks good to me. :) Would be awesome to have @annabeldunstone check up on the stylesheet updates.

## Why was this MR needed?

> Buttons were misaligned

> Progress bar was not 100% width

> Stats were cut in the middle

> Milestone name/date text overflow

![Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.37.49_PM](/uploads/4da67c9f81d71873188e4a5cafed8113/Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.37.49_PM.png)

![Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.41.58_PM](/uploads/b3d767ce49e37b251c3192ed051400b8/Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.41.58_PM.png)

![Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.46.41_PM](/uploads/353ad59a88f3dea9e3f88e6ea05c1af3/Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.46.41_PM.png)

## Screenshots (if relevant)

![Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_6.15.58_PM](/uploads/a26768701ea6cb00ccd85a5ac0772e36/Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_6.15.58_PM.png)

![Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.57.04_PM](/uploads/b94cf1b7593589948216342b48a19831/Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.57.04_PM.png)

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

Closes #18852

See merge request !6655

Fix migration paths

This fixes `migration paths` failure, preventing the `knapsack` from auto-balancing test suites:
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/builds/6485942

cc @stanhu

See merge request !7640

This reverts commit 23fc7875.

Improve deploy message

## What does this MR do?
Improves deploy message to make it more descriptive and useable then what is already offered by deploy command.

## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria?

- [ ] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added
- [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md)
- [ ] API support added
- Tests
  - [ ] Added for this feature/bug
  - [ ] All builds are passing
- [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html)
- [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides)
- [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please)
- [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits)

## What are the relevant issue numbers?

See merge request !7629

Evalute time_ago method instead of printing it

![Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_21.00.34](/uploads/295ffa522865fe1865b0c0b552a49ebf/Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_21.00.34.png)

See merge request !7634