- 22 Nov, 2016 6 commits
-
-
Lin Jen-Shin authored
and keep it only called in update_branch_with_hooks.
-
Lin Jen-Shin authored
* upstream/master: (657 commits) Use single quote for strings Ue svg from SVGs object Dont trigger CI builds [ci skip] Revert "Test only migrations" Add custom copy for each empty stage Fetch only one revision Highlight nav item on hover Test only migrations Fix migration paths tests Scroll CA stage panel on mobile Fix CSS declaration administer to administrator Move SVGs to JS objects for easy reuse Improve deploy command message No enough data to Not enough data Keep the cookie name as before Fix variable usage Evalute time_ago method instead of printing it Removed button styling from restricted visibility levels and added checkboxes with icons Do not show overview message if there’s already CA data ...
-
Jacob Schatz authored
Backport SmartInterval, PrettyTime, SubbableResource from EE. ## What does this MR do? Backports infrastructure used for EE-only Timetracking so it can be used and improved upon in CE. This doesn't really need review... it was already reviewed and merged in EE. There are no side effects or conflicts, just three new classes added: 1. `SubbableResource` -- pubsub for ajax resources 2. `SmartInterval`-- for configurable polling 3. `PrettyTime` -- time parsing and formatting utility methods - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/985 https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/merge_requests/870 cc: @jschatz1 See merge request !7573
-
Jacob Schatz authored
Restricted visibility buttons to checkboxes ## What does this MR do? Changes the `Restricted visibility levels` settings to use checkboxes instead of a button group. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-14_at_19.25.48](/uploads/0c6ee415ee0c89c0a7e3ffd98f88df71/Screen_Shot_2016-11-14_at_19.25.48.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #18136 See merge request !7463
-
Jacob Schatz authored
Issues empty state ## What does this MR do? Adds the empty state for the project, dashboard and group issues. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? ## Why was this MR needed? ## Screenshots (if relevant) ### Filtered to show no issues (on group issues page in this case but also dashboard and projects) ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.55.56](/uploads/b598af4a8a5e2c9fbb859abf36e70e4b/Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.55.56.png) ### Project with no issues ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.57.08](/uploads/8f54fdf1b3101c46299249fa2944207d/Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.57.08.png) ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.57.17](/uploads/1d2d162e1d845dd05e945d8ebb1d2101/Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.57.17.png) ### Group with no projects with any issues ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.54.55](/uploads/f28dc2038839d5bda0eb37f37927d5db/Screen_Shot_2016-11-08_at_20.54.55.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #20840 Closes #20850 See merge request !7309
-
Jacob Schatz authored
Cycle analytics second iteration frontend ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Mostly typos and code guidelines. ## Why was this MR needed? This implements the frontend part of !6859 for #23449 ## Screenshots **Initial view** ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_5.28.43_PM](/uploads/ff9cfa9c9d6c2da28c24e03e384f89af/Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_5.28.43_PM.png) **Cycle Analytics with data** ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_2.09.24_PM](/uploads/18d9786c090bdd554cf786c879543302/Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_2.09.24_PM.png) **User doesn't have access for a stage** ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_2.11.01_PM](/uploads/d1ea76a63f2de2224954b5f40038c488/Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_2.11.01_PM.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #23449 See merge request !7366
-
- 21 Nov, 2016 34 commits
-
-
Jacob Schatz authored
Make milestone page responsive Credit to @yury-n for this one.
⭐ 🌟 ⭐ Original MR: !5255 ## What does this MR do? > Makes the milestone page more mobile friendly ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? > Shouldn't be but maybe double check that the views I changed are exclusively used by the milestone details page I was amending and not any other pages that I haven't tested after my changes. Looks good to me. :) Would be awesome to have @annabeldunstone check up on the stylesheet updates. ## Why was this MR needed? > Buttons were misaligned > Progress bar was not 100% width > Stats were cut in the middle > Milestone name/date text overflow ![Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.37.49_PM](/uploads/4da67c9f81d71873188e4a5cafed8113/Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.37.49_PM.png) ![Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.41.58_PM](/uploads/b3d767ce49e37b251c3192ed051400b8/Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.41.58_PM.png) ![Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.46.41_PM](/uploads/353ad59a88f3dea9e3f88e6ea05c1af3/Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.46.41_PM.png) ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_6.15.58_PM](/uploads/a26768701ea6cb00ccd85a5ac0772e36/Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_6.15.58_PM.png) ![Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.57.04_PM](/uploads/b94cf1b7593589948216342b48a19831/Screen_Shot_2016-07-14_at_5.57.04_PM.png) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [CHANGELOG](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CHANGELOG) entry added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if you do - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #18852 See merge request !6655 -
Alfredo Sumaran authored
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
-
Kamil Trzciński authored
Fix migration paths This fixes `migration paths` failure, preventing the `knapsack` from auto-balancing test suites: https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/builds/6485942 cc @stanhu See merge request !7640
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
This reverts commit 23fc7875.
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
-
Kamil Trzciński authored
Improve deploy message ## What does this MR do? Improves deploy message to make it more descriptive and useable then what is already offered by deploy command. ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? See merge request !7629
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
Annabel Dunstone Gray authored
-
Kamil Trzciński authored
Evalute time_ago method instead of printing it ![Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_21.00.34](/uploads/295ffa522865fe1865b0c0b552a49ebf/Screen_Shot_2016-11-21_at_21.00.34.png) See merge request !7634
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
-
Sean McGivern authored
Fix 500 error when group name ends with git Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-com/support-forum/issues/1298 Closes https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/issues/24742 See merge request !7630
-
Kamil Trzcinski authored
-
Rémy Coutable authored
Add deploy chat command This adds a new ChatOps command: ``` /trigger deploy <environment> to <environment> ``` See merge request !7619
-
Kamil Trzciński authored
Send registry address with build payload ## What does this MR do? Adds `registry_url` as a part of a build payload, when sending a response to a GitLab Runner which requested a new build. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? Change in `lib/ci/api/entities.rb`. ## Why was this MR needed? This is one of the steps needed to add support for private/protected registries hosted with GitLab CE/EE. ## Screenshots (if relevant) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [x] API support added - Tests - [x] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Related to gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-multi-runner#1828, gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-multi-runner!386, gitlab-org/gitlab-ci-multi-runner#1434 See merge request !7474
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
This is to avoid prompting the same dialog for people who already dismissed the dialog.
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
-
Fatih Acet authored
Fix permissions error ## What does this MR do? Gives the permissions to the child row in order to render it properly. ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [ ] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added - [ ] [Documentation created/updated](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/doc/development/doc_styleguide.md) - [ ] API support added - Tests - [ ] Added for this feature/bug - [ ] All builds are passing - [ ] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [ ] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [ ] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [ ] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? See merge request !7627
-
Fatih Acet authored
Resolve "Activity entries are not loaded fully to cover full window's height" ## What does this MR do? Fixes a bug in which a browser window large enough to encompass the default number of items in an auto-loading endless-scroll list could not trigger the loading of additional items. ## Are there points in the code the reviewer needs to double check? I refactored activities.js and pager.js into es6 syntax while I was investigating the issue. No changes were made other than some es6 flourishes and eslint conformity, so nothing should be effected, but perhaps best to double check other pages which utilize these scripts. ## Screenshots (if relevant) ![endless-scroll-fixed](/uploads/b672b606826af745528c209ab6cfe95c/endless-scroll-fixed.gif) ## Does this MR meet the acceptance criteria? - [x] [Changelog entry](https://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/changelog.html) added - Tests - [x] All builds are passing - [x] Conform by the [merge request performance guides](http://docs.gitlab.com/ce/development/merge_request_performance_guidelines.html) - [x] Conform by the [style guides](https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ce/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#style-guides) - [x] Branch has no merge conflicts with `master` (if it does - rebase it please) - [x] [Squashed related commits together](https://git-scm.com/book/en/Git-Tools-Rewriting-History#Squashing-Commits) ## What are the relevant issue numbers? Closes #24499 See merge request !7608
-
Z.J. van de Weg authored
-
Sean McGivern authored
Fix errors happening when source branch of merge request is removed and then restored See merge request !7568
-
Luke "Jared" Bennett authored
Review changes
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
-
Dmitriy Zaporozhets authored
Signed-off-by: Dmitriy Zaporozhets <dmitriy.zaporozhets@gmail.com>
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
-
Alfredo Sumaran authored
This will be removed until we figure out in what scenario we should display the overview message.
-