-
Daniel Vetter authored
The update_gfx_val function called from mark_busy wasn't taking the mchdev_lock, as it should have. Also sprinkle a few spinlock asserts over the code to document things better. Things are still rather confusing, especially since a few variables in dev_priv are used by both the gen6+ rps code and the ilk ips code. But protected by totally different locks. Follow-on patches will clean that up. v2: Don't add a deadlock ... hence split up update_gfx_val into a wrapper that grabs the lock and an internal __ variant for callsites within intel_pm.c that already have taken the lock. v3: Mark the internal helper as static, noticed by Ben Widawsky. v4: Damien Lespiau had questions about the safety of the ips setup sequence, explain in a comment why it works. Reviewed-by: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-Off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
02d71956