-
Jiri Olsa authored
The perf_hpp__init currently does not respect sorting dimensions and the setup_sorting function could endup queueing same format twice. That screwed up the perf_hpp__list and got stuck in loop within perf_hpp__setup_output_field function. $ perf report -F +overhead 0x00000000004c1355 in perf_hpp__is_sort_entry (format=format@entry=0x880440 <perf_hpp.format>) at util/sort.c:1506 1506 { #0 0x00000000004c1355 in perf_hpp__is_sort_entry (format=format@entry=0x880440 <perf_hpp.format>) at util/sort.c:1506 #1 0x00000000004c139d in perf_hpp__same_sort_entry (a=a@entry=0x880440 <perf_hpp.format>, b=b@entry=0x2bb2fe0) at util/sort.c:1380 #2 0x00000000004f8d3c in perf_hpp__setup_output_field () at ui/hist.c:554 #3 0x00000000004c1d1e in setup_sorting () at util/sort.c:1984 #4 0x000000000042efbf in cmd_report (argc=0, argv=0x7ffea5a0e790, prefix=<optimized out>) at builtin-report.c:874 #5 0x0000000000476f13 in run_builtin (p=p@entry=0x875628 <commands+168>, argc=argc@entry=3, argv=argv@entry=0x7ffea5a0e790) at perf.c:385 #6 0x000000000047710b in handle_internal_command (argc=3, argv=0x7ffea5a0e790) at perf.c:445 #7 0x0000000000477176 in run_argv (argcp=argcp@entry=0x7ffea5a0e5fc, argv=argv@entry=0x7ffea5a0e5f0) at perf.c:489 #8 0x00000000004773e7 in main (argc=3, argv=0x7ffea5a0e790) at perf.c:606 Using hpp_dimension__add_output function to register the output column. It will also mark the dimension as taken and omit above stuck. Reported-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org> Tested-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com> Acked-by: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1444134312-29136-4-git-send-email-jolsa@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
1178bfd4