-
Kees Cook authored
commit ed5f1326 upstream. Passing EPERM during syscall skipping was confusing since the test wasn't actually exercising the errno evaluation -- it was just passing a literal "1" (EPERM). Instead, expand the tests to check both direct value returns (positive, 45000 in this case), and errno values (negative, -ESRCH in this case) to check both fake success and fake failure during syscall skipping. Reported-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@canonical.com> Fixes: a33b2d03 ("selftests/seccomp: Add tests for basic ptrace actions") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
0fb0acc0