This reverts commit 79f77bf9.

This is obviously wrong, and I have no idea how I missed seeing the
warning in testing: I must just not have looked at the right logs.  The
caller bumps rq_resused/rq_next_page, so it will always be hit on a
large enough read.
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>