This fixes the below reported false lockdep warning.  e096d0c7
("lockdep: Add helper function for dir vs file i_mutex annotation") added
a similar annotation for every other inode in hugetlbfs but missed the
root inode because it was allocated by a separate function.

For HugeTLB fs we allow taking i_mutex in mmap.  HugeTLB fs doesn't
support file write and its file read callback is modified in a05b0855
("hugetlbfs: avoid taking i_mutex from hugetlbfs_read()") to not take
i_mutex.  Hence for HugeTLB fs with regular files we really don't take
i_mutex with mmap_sem held.

 ======================================================
 [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
 3.4.0-rc1+ #322 Not tainted
 -------------------------------------------------------
 bash/1572 is trying to acquire lock:
  (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}, at: [<ffffffff810f1618>] might_fault+0x40/0x90

 but task is already holding lock:
  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81125f88>] vfs_readdir+0x56/0xa8

 which lock already depends on the new lock.

 the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:

 -> #1 (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12){+.+.+.}:
        [<ffffffff810a09e5>] lock_acquire+0xd5/0xfa
        [<ffffffff816a2f5e>] __mutex_lock_common+0x48/0x350
        [<ffffffff816a3325>] mutex_lock_nested+0x2a/0x31
        [<ffffffff811fb8e1>] hugetlbfs_file_mmap+0x7d/0x104
        [<ffffffff810f859a>] mmap_region+0x272/0x47d
        [<ffffffff810f8a39>] do_mmap_pgoff+0x294/0x2ee
        [<ffffffff810f8b65>] sys_mmap_pgoff+0xd2/0x10e
        [<ffffffff8103d19e>] sys_mmap+0x1d/0x1f
        [<ffffffff816a5922>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

 -> #0 (&mm->mmap_sem){++++++}:
        [<ffffffff810a0256>] __lock_acquire+0xa81/0xd75
        [<ffffffff810a09e5>] lock_acquire+0xd5/0xfa
        [<ffffffff810f1645>] might_fault+0x6d/0x90
        [<ffffffff81125d62>] filldir+0x6a/0xc2
        [<ffffffff81133a83>] dcache_readdir+0x5c/0x222
        [<ffffffff81125fa8>] vfs_readdir+0x76/0xa8
        [<ffffffff811260b6>] sys_getdents+0x79/0xc9
        [<ffffffff816a5922>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

 other info that might help us debug this:

  Possible unsafe locking scenario:

        CPU0                    CPU1
        ----                    ----
   lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12);
                                lock(&mm->mmap_sem);
                                lock(&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12);
   lock(&mm->mmap_sem);

  *** DEADLOCK ***

 1 lock held by bash/1572:
  #0:  (&sb->s_type->i_mutex_key#12){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffff81125f88>] vfs_readdir+0x56/0xa8

 stack backtrace:
 Pid: 1572, comm: bash Not tainted 3.4.0-rc1+ #322
 Call Trace:
  [<ffffffff81699a3c>] print_circular_bug+0x1f8/0x209
  [<ffffffff810a0256>] __lock_acquire+0xa81/0xd75
  [<ffffffff810f38aa>] ? handle_pte_fault+0x5ff/0x614
  [<ffffffff8109e622>] ? mark_lock+0x2d/0x258
  [<ffffffff810f1618>] ? might_fault+0x40/0x90
  [<ffffffff810a09e5>] lock_acquire+0xd5/0xfa
  [<ffffffff810f1618>] ? might_fault+0x40/0x90
  [<ffffffff816a3249>] ? __mutex_lock_common+0x333/0x350
  [<ffffffff810f1645>] might_fault+0x6d/0x90
  [<ffffffff810f1618>] ? might_fault+0x40/0x90
  [<ffffffff81125d62>] filldir+0x6a/0xc2
  [<ffffffff81133a83>] dcache_readdir+0x5c/0x222
  [<ffffffff81125cf8>] ? sys_ioctl+0x74/0x74
  [<ffffffff81125cf8>] ? sys_ioctl+0x74/0x74
  [<ffffffff81125cf8>] ? sys_ioctl+0x74/0x74
  [<ffffffff81125fa8>] vfs_readdir+0x76/0xa8
  [<ffffffff811260b6>] sys_getdents+0x79/0xc9
  [<ffffffff816a5922>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>