-
Dave Chinner authored
Test generic/224 is failing with a corruption being detected on one of Michael's test boxes. Debug that Michael added is indicating that the minleft trimming is resulting in an underflow: ..... before fixup: rlen 1 args->len 0 after xfs_alloc_fix_len : rlen 1 args->len 1 before goto out_nominleft: rlen 1 args->len 0 before fixup: rlen 1 args->len 0 after xfs_alloc_fix_len : rlen 1 args->len 1 after fixup: rlen 1 args->len 1 before fixup: rlen 1 args->len 0 after xfs_alloc_fix_len : rlen 1 args->len 1 after fixup: rlen 4294967295 args->len 4294967295 XFS: Assertion failed: fs_is_ok, file: fs/xfs/libxfs/xfs_alloc.c, line: 1424 The "goto out_nominleft:" indicates that we are getting close to ENOSPC in the AG, and a couple of allocations later we underflow and the corruption check fires in xfs_alloc_ag_vextent_size(). The issue is that the extent length fixups comaprisons are done with variables of xfs_extlen_t types. These are unsigned so an underflow looks like a really big value and hence is not detected as being smaller than the minimum length allowed for the extent. Hence the corruption check fires as it is noticing that the returned length is longer than the original extent length passed in. This can be easily fixed by ensuring we do the underflow test on signed values, the same way xfs_alloc_fix_len() prevents underflow. So we realise in future that these casts prevent underflows from going undetected, add comments to the code indicating this. Reported-by:
Michael L. Semon <mlsemon35@gmail.com> Tested-by:
Michael L. Semon <mlsemon35@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by:
Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
3790a8cd