The naming convension of hardware_[dis|en]able family is little bit confusing
because only hardware_[dis|en]able_all are using _nolock suffix.

Renaming current hardware_[dis|en]able() to *_nolock() and using
hardware_[dis|en]able() as wrapper functions which take kvm_lock for them
reduces extra confusion.
Signed-off-by: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>