It's an atomic_t and the code accesses the "counter" field in it directly
instead of using atomic_read(). It also is sometimes accessed under a
spinlock and sometimes not. Move it out of the spinlock since we don't need
belt-and-suspenders for something that's just informational.
Reviewed-by: Suresh Jayaraman <sjayaraman@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steve French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>