-
J. Bruce Fields authored
if we receive a compound such that: - the sessionid, slot, and sequence number in the SEQUENCE op match a cached succesful reply with N ops, and - the Nth operation of the compound is a PUTFH, PUTPUBFH, PUTROOTFH, or RESTOREFH, then nfsd4_sequence will return 0 and set cstate->status to nfserr_replay_cache. The current filehandle will not be set. This will cause us to call check_nfsd_access with first argument NULL. To nfsd4_compound it looks like we just succesfully executed an operation that set a filehandle, but the current filehandle is not set. Fix this by moving the nfserr_replay_cache earlier. There was never any reason to have it after the encode_op label, since the only case where he hit that is when opdesc->op_func sets it. Note that there are two ways we could hit this case: - a client is resending a previously sent compound that ended with one of the four PUTFH-like operations, or - a client is sending a *new* compound that (incorrectly) shares sessionid, slot, and sequence number with a previously sent compound, and the length of the previously sent compound happens to match the position of a PUTFH-like operation in the new compound. The second is obviously incorrect client behavior. The first is also very strange--the only purpose of a PUTFH-like operation is to set the current filehandle to be used by the following operation, so there's no point in having it as the last in a compound. So it's likely this requires a buggy or malicious client to reproduce. Reported-by: Scott Mayhew <smayhew@redhat.com> Cc: stable@kernel.vger.org Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
9a307403