-
Paul Walmsley authored
ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: call all suspend, resume callbacks when OMAP_DEVICE_NO_IDLE_ON_SUSPEND is set During system suspend, when OMAP_DEVICE_NO_IDLE_ON_SUSPEND is set on an omap_device, call the corresponding driver's ->suspend() and ->suspend_noirq() callbacks (if present). Similarly, during resume, the driver's ->resume() and ->resume_noirq() callbacks must both be called, if present. (The previous code only called ->suspend_noirq() and ->resume_noirq().) If all of these callbacks aren't called, some important driver suspend/resume code may not get executed. In current mainline, the bug fixed by this patch is only a problem under the following conditions: - the kernel is running on an OMAP4 - an OMAP UART is used as a console - the kernel command line parameter 'no_console_suspend' is specified - and the system enters suspend ("echo mem > /sys/power/state"). Under this combined circumstance, the system cannot be awakened via the serial port after commit be4b0281c ("tty: serial: OMAP: block idle while the UART is transferring data in PIO mode"). This is because the OMAP UART driver's ->suspend() callback is never called. The ->suspend() callback would have called uart_suspend_port() which in turn would call enable_irq_wake(). Since enable_irq_wake() isn't called for the UART's IRQ, check_wakeup_irqs() would mask off the UART IRQ in the GIC. On v3.3 kernels prior to the above commit, serial resume from suspend presumably occurred via the PRCM interrupt. The UART was in smart-idle mode, so it was able to send a PRCM wakeup which in turn would be converted into a PRCM interrupt to the GIC, waking up the kernel. But after the above commit, when the system is suspended in the middle of a UART transmit, the UART IP block would be in no-idle mode. In no-idle mode, the UART won't generate wakeups to the PRCM when incoming characters are received; only GIC interrupts. But since the UART driver's ->suspend() callback is never called, uart_suspend_port() and enable_irq_wake() is never called; so the UART interrupt is masked by check_wakeup_irqs() and the UART can't wake up the MPU. The remaining mechanism that could have awakened the system would have been I/O chain wakeups. These wouldn't be active because the console UART's clocks are never disabled when no_console_suspend is used, preventing the full chip from idling. Also, current mainline doesn't yet support full chip idle states for OMAP4, so I/O chain wakeups are not enabled. This patch is the result of a collaboration. John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> and Andy Green <andy.green@linaro.org> reported the serial wakeup problem that led to the discovery of this problem. Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> narrowed the problem down to the use of no_console_suspend. Signed-off-by: Paul Walmsley <paul@pwsan.com> Cc: John Stultz <johnstul@us.ibm.com> Cc: Andy Green <andy.green@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khilman@ti.com>
b7c39a3f