There are many things wrong with the function
ice_set_vf_spoofchk().

1. The VSI being modified is the PF VSI, not the VF VSI.
2. We are enabling Rx VLAN pruning instead of Tx VLAN anti-spoof.
3. The spoofchk setting for each VF is not initialized correctly
   or re-initialized correctly on reset.

To fix [1] we need to make sure we are modifying the VF VSI.
This is done by using the vf->lan_vsi_idx to index into the PF's
VSI array.

To fix [2] replace setting Rx VLAN pruning in ice_set_vf_spoofchk()
with setting Tx VLAN anti-spoof.

To Fix [3] we need to make sure the initial VSI settings match what
is done in ice_set_vf_spoofchk() for spoofchk=on. Also make sure
this also works for VF reset. This was done by modifying ice_vsi_init()
to account for the current spoofchk state of the VF VSI.

Because of these changes, Tx VLAN anti-spoof needs to be removed
from ice_cfg_vlan_pruning(). This is okay for the VF because this
is now controlled from the admin enabling/disabling spoofchk. For the
PF, Tx VLAN anti-spoof should not be set. This change requires us to
call ice_set_vf_spoofchk() when configuring promiscuous mode for
the VF which requires ice_set_vf_spoofchk() to move in order to prevent
a forward declaration prototype.

Also, add VLAN 0 by default when allocating a VF since the PF is unaware
if the guest OS is running the 8021q module. Without this, MDD events will
trigger on untagged traffic because spoofcheck is enabled by default. Due
to this change, ignore add/delete messages for VLAN 0 from VIRTCHNL since
this is added/deleted during VF initialization/teardown respectively and
should not be modified.
Signed-off-by: Brett Creeley <brett.creeley@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>