Add and use snd_pcm_stream_lock_nested() in snd_pcm_link/unlink
implementation.  The code is fine, but generates a lockdep complaint:

============================================
WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
5.7.1mq+ #381 Tainted: G           O
--------------------------------------------
pulseaudio/4180 is trying to acquire lock:
ffff888402d6f508 (&group->lock){-...}-{2:2}, at: snd_pcm_common_ioctl+0xda8/0xee0 [snd_pcm]

but task is already holding lock:
ffff8883f7a8cf18 (&group->lock){-...}-{2:2}, at: snd_pcm_common_ioctl+0xe4e/0xee0 [snd_pcm]

other info that might help us debug this:
 Possible unsafe locking scenario:

       CPU0
       ----
  lock(&group->lock);
  lock(&group->lock);

 *** DEADLOCK ***

 May be due to missing lock nesting notation

2 locks held by pulseaudio/4180:
 #0: ffffffffa1a05190 (snd_pcm_link_rwsem){++++}-{3:3}, at: snd_pcm_common_ioctl+0xca0/0xee0 [snd_pcm]
 #1: ffff8883f7a8cf18 (&group->lock){-...}-{2:2}, at: snd_pcm_common_ioctl+0xe4e/0xee0 [snd_pcm]
[...]

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: f57f3df0 ("ALSA: pcm: More fine-grained PCM link locking")
Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/37252c65941e58473b1219ca9fab03d48f47e3e3.1591610330.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.plSigned-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>