-
Dave Chinner authored
We do some work in xfs_buf_ioend, and some work in xfs_buf_iodone_work, but much of that functionality is the same. This work can all be done in a single function, leaving xfs_buf_iodone just a wrapper to determine if we should execute it by workqueue or directly. hence rename xfs_buf_iodone_work to xfs_buf_ioend(), and add a new xfs_buf_ioend_async() for places that need async processing. Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
e8aaba9a