-
John Harrison authored
Added reference counting of the request structure around __wait_seqno() calls. This is a precursor to updating the wait code itself to take the request rather than a seqno. At that point, it would be a Bad Idea for a request object to be retired and freed while the wait code is still using it. v3: Note that even though the mutex lock is held during a call to i915_wait_seqno(), it is still necessary to explicitly bump the reference count. It appears that the shrinker can asynchronously retire items even though the mutex is locked. For: VIZ-4377 Signed-off-by: John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@Intel.com> Reviewed-by: Thomas Daniel <Thomas.Daniel@intel.com> [danvet: Remove wrongly squashed hunk which breaks the build.] Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
ff865885