Commit 0597e818 authored by Viresh Kumar's avatar Viresh Kumar Committed by Rafael J. Wysocki

PM / OPP: Add opp_rcu_lockdep_assert() to _find_device_opp()

_find_device_opp() should be called with rcu-read lock or
dev_opp_list_lock held. Add the opp_rcu_lockdep_assert() check to make
sure caller have taken appropriate locks.

Fix comment over the routine as well.
Suggested-by: default avatarStephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
parent 4a3a1353
......@@ -81,14 +81,18 @@ static struct device_opp *_managed_opp(const struct device_node *np)
* Return: pointer to 'struct device_opp' if found, otherwise -ENODEV or
* -EINVAL based on type of error.
*
* Locking: This function must be called under rcu_read_lock(). device_opp
* is a RCU protected pointer. This means that device_opp is valid as long
* as we are under RCU lock.
* Locking: For readers, this function must be called under rcu_read_lock().
* device_opp is a RCU protected pointer, which means that device_opp is valid
* as long as we are under RCU lock.
*
* For Writers, this function must be called with dev_opp_list_lock held.
*/
struct device_opp *_find_device_opp(struct device *dev)
{
struct device_opp *dev_opp;
opp_rcu_lockdep_assert();
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(dev)) {
pr_err("%s: Invalid parameters\n", __func__);
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment