Commit 06326e40 authored by Christoph Hellwig's avatar Christoph Hellwig Committed by David S. Miller

[SPARC]: bpp: remove sleep_on usage

Use schedule_timeout() instead of sleep_on + timer.  Totally untested
due to lack of hardware, but the changes are rather trivial.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent e7270dec
......@@ -79,10 +79,6 @@ struct inst {
unsigned char run_length;
unsigned char repeat_byte;
/* These members manage timeouts for programmed delays */
wait_queue_head_t wait_queue;
struct timer_list timer_list;
};
static struct inst instances[BPP_NO];
......@@ -297,16 +293,10 @@ static unsigned short get_pins(unsigned minor)
#endif /* __sparc__ */
static void bpp_wake_up(unsigned long val)
{ wake_up(&instances[val].wait_queue); }
static void snooze(unsigned long snooze_time, unsigned minor)
{
init_timer(&instances[minor].timer_list);
instances[minor].timer_list.expires = jiffies + snooze_time + 1;
instances[minor].timer_list.data = minor;
add_timer(&instances[minor].timer_list);
sleep_on (&instances[minor].wait_queue);
set_current_state(TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
schedule_timeout(snooze_time + 1);
}
static int wait_for(unsigned short set, unsigned short clr,
......@@ -880,11 +870,8 @@ static void probeLptPort(unsigned idx)
instances[idx].enhanced = 0;
instances[idx].direction = 0;
instances[idx].mode = COMPATIBILITY;
instances[idx].wait_queue = 0;
instances[idx].run_length = 0;
instances[idx].run_flag = 0;
init_timer(&instances[idx].timer_list);
instances[idx].timer_list.function = bpp_wake_up;
if (!request_region(lpAddr,3, dev_name)) return;
/*
......@@ -977,11 +964,8 @@ static void probeLptPort(unsigned idx)
instances[idx].enhanced = 0;
instances[idx].direction = 0;
instances[idx].mode = COMPATIBILITY;
init_waitqueue_head(&instances[idx].wait_queue);
instances[idx].run_length = 0;
instances[idx].run_flag = 0;
init_timer(&instances[idx].timer_list);
instances[idx].timer_list.function = bpp_wake_up;
if (!rp) return;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment