Commit 0716abbb authored by Dmitry Kasatkin's avatar Dmitry Kasatkin Committed by Mimi Zohar

ima: use atomic bit operations to protect policy update interface

The current implementation uses an atomic counter to provide exclusive
access to the sysfs 'policy' entry to update the IMA policy. While it is
highly unlikely, the usage of a counter might potentially allow another
process to overflow the counter, open the interface and insert additional
rules into the policy being loaded.

This patch replaces using an atomic counter with atomic bit operations
which is more reliable and a widely used method to provide exclusive access.

As bit operation keep the interface locked after successful update, it makes
it unnecessary to verify if the default policy was set or not during parsing
and interface closing. This patch also removes that code.

Changes in v3:
* move audit log message to ima_relead_policy() to report successful and
  unsuccessful result
* unnecessary comment removed

Changes in v2:
* keep interface locked after successful policy load as in original design
* remove sysfs entry as in original design
Signed-off-by: default avatarDmitry Kasatkin <d.kasatkin@samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMimi Zohar <zohar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
parent 7178784f
......@@ -288,7 +288,12 @@ static struct dentry *runtime_measurements_count;
static struct dentry *violations;
static struct dentry *ima_policy;
static atomic_t policy_opencount = ATOMIC_INIT(1);
enum ima_fs_flags {
IMA_FS_BUSY,
};
static unsigned long ima_fs_flags;
/*
* ima_open_policy: sequentialize access to the policy file
*/
......@@ -297,9 +302,9 @@ static int ima_open_policy(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
/* No point in being allowed to open it if you aren't going to write */
if (!(filp->f_flags & O_WRONLY))
return -EACCES;
if (atomic_dec_and_test(&policy_opencount))
return 0;
return -EBUSY;
if (test_and_set_bit(IMA_FS_BUSY, &ima_fs_flags))
return -EBUSY;
return 0;
}
/*
......@@ -311,12 +316,16 @@ static int ima_open_policy(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
*/
static int ima_release_policy(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
pr_info("IMA: policy update %s\n",
valid_policy ? "completed" : "failed");
const char *cause = valid_policy ? "completed" : "failed";
pr_info("IMA: policy update %s\n", cause);
integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_STATUS, NULL, NULL,
"policy_update", cause, !valid_policy, 0);
if (!valid_policy) {
ima_delete_rules();
valid_policy = 1;
atomic_set(&policy_opencount, 1);
clear_bit(IMA_FS_BUSY, &ima_fs_flags);
return 0;
}
ima_update_policy();
......
......@@ -356,19 +356,8 @@ void __init ima_init_policy(void)
*/
void ima_update_policy(void)
{
static const char op[] = "policy_update";
const char *cause = "already-exists";
int result = 1;
int audit_info = 0;
if (ima_rules == &ima_default_rules) {
ima_rules = &ima_policy_rules;
ima_update_policy_flag();
cause = "complete";
result = 0;
}
integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_STATUS, NULL,
NULL, op, cause, result, audit_info);
ima_rules = &ima_policy_rules;
ima_update_policy_flag();
}
enum {
......@@ -686,14 +675,6 @@ ssize_t ima_parse_add_rule(char *rule)
ssize_t result, len;
int audit_info = 0;
/* Prevent installed policy from changing */
if (ima_rules != &ima_default_rules) {
integrity_audit_msg(AUDIT_INTEGRITY_STATUS, NULL,
NULL, op, "already-exists",
-EACCES, audit_info);
return -EACCES;
}
p = strsep(&rule, "\n");
len = strlen(p) + 1;
p += strspn(p, " \t");
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment