Commit 08361aa8 authored by Eric Dumazet's avatar Eric Dumazet Committed by Patrick McHardy

netfilter: ip_tables: unfold two critical loops in ip_packet_match()

While doing oprofile tests I noticed two loops are not properly unrolled by gcc

Using a hand coded unrolled loop provides nice speedup : ipt_do_table
credited of 2.52 % of cpu instead of 3.29 % in tbench.
Signed-off-by: default avatarEric Dumazet <dada1@cosmosbay.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPatrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
parent 268cb38e
...@@ -74,6 +74,25 @@ do { \ ...@@ -74,6 +74,25 @@ do { \
Hence the start of any table is given by get_table() below. */ Hence the start of any table is given by get_table() below. */
static unsigned long ifname_compare(const char *_a, const char *_b,
const unsigned char *_mask)
{
const unsigned long *a = (const unsigned long *)_a;
const unsigned long *b = (const unsigned long *)_b;
const unsigned long *mask = (const unsigned long *)_mask;
unsigned long ret;
ret = (a[0] ^ b[0]) & mask[0];
if (IFNAMSIZ > sizeof(unsigned long))
ret |= (a[1] ^ b[1]) & mask[1];
if (IFNAMSIZ > 2 * sizeof(unsigned long))
ret |= (a[2] ^ b[2]) & mask[2];
if (IFNAMSIZ > 3 * sizeof(unsigned long))
ret |= (a[3] ^ b[3]) & mask[3];
BUILD_BUG_ON(IFNAMSIZ > 4 * sizeof(unsigned long));
return ret;
}
/* Returns whether matches rule or not. */ /* Returns whether matches rule or not. */
/* Performance critical - called for every packet */ /* Performance critical - called for every packet */
static inline bool static inline bool
...@@ -83,7 +102,6 @@ ip_packet_match(const struct iphdr *ip, ...@@ -83,7 +102,6 @@ ip_packet_match(const struct iphdr *ip,
const struct ipt_ip *ipinfo, const struct ipt_ip *ipinfo,
int isfrag) int isfrag)
{ {
size_t i;
unsigned long ret; unsigned long ret;
#define FWINV(bool, invflg) ((bool) ^ !!(ipinfo->invflags & (invflg))) #define FWINV(bool, invflg) ((bool) ^ !!(ipinfo->invflags & (invflg)))
...@@ -103,12 +121,7 @@ ip_packet_match(const struct iphdr *ip, ...@@ -103,12 +121,7 @@ ip_packet_match(const struct iphdr *ip,
return false; return false;
} }
/* Look for ifname matches; this should unroll nicely. */ ret = ifname_compare(indev, ipinfo->iniface, ipinfo->iniface_mask);
for (i = 0, ret = 0; i < IFNAMSIZ/sizeof(unsigned long); i++) {
ret |= (((const unsigned long *)indev)[i]
^ ((const unsigned long *)ipinfo->iniface)[i])
& ((const unsigned long *)ipinfo->iniface_mask)[i];
}
if (FWINV(ret != 0, IPT_INV_VIA_IN)) { if (FWINV(ret != 0, IPT_INV_VIA_IN)) {
dprintf("VIA in mismatch (%s vs %s).%s\n", dprintf("VIA in mismatch (%s vs %s).%s\n",
...@@ -117,11 +130,7 @@ ip_packet_match(const struct iphdr *ip, ...@@ -117,11 +130,7 @@ ip_packet_match(const struct iphdr *ip,
return false; return false;
} }
for (i = 0, ret = 0; i < IFNAMSIZ/sizeof(unsigned long); i++) { ret = ifname_compare(outdev, ipinfo->outiface, ipinfo->outiface_mask);
ret |= (((const unsigned long *)outdev)[i]
^ ((const unsigned long *)ipinfo->outiface)[i])
& ((const unsigned long *)ipinfo->outiface_mask)[i];
}
if (FWINV(ret != 0, IPT_INV_VIA_OUT)) { if (FWINV(ret != 0, IPT_INV_VIA_OUT)) {
dprintf("VIA out mismatch (%s vs %s).%s\n", dprintf("VIA out mismatch (%s vs %s).%s\n",
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment