Commit 0e2de78e authored by Maxime COQUELIN's avatar Maxime COQUELIN Committed by Mike Turquette

clk: divider: Optimize clk_divider_bestdiv loop

Currently, the for-loop used to try all the different dividers to find the
one that best fit tries all the values from 1 to max_div, incrementing by one.
In case of power-of-two, or table based divider, the loop isn't optimal.

Instead of incrementing by one, this patch provides directly the next divider.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMaxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@st.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMike Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>
parent 774b5143
......@@ -240,6 +240,18 @@ static bool _is_best_div(struct clk_divider *divider,
return now <= rate && now > best;
}
static int _next_div(struct clk_divider *divider, int div)
{
div++;
if (divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO)
return __roundup_pow_of_two(div);
if (divider->table)
return _round_up_table(divider->table, div);
return div;
}
static int clk_divider_bestdiv(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
unsigned long *best_parent_rate)
{
......@@ -267,7 +279,7 @@ static int clk_divider_bestdiv(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
*/
maxdiv = min(ULONG_MAX / rate, maxdiv);
for (i = 1; i <= maxdiv; i++) {
for (i = 1; i <= maxdiv; i = _next_div(divider, i)) {
if (!_is_valid_div(divider, i))
continue;
if (rate * i == parent_rate_saved) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment