Commit 124fe663 authored by Josef Bacik's avatar Josef Bacik

Btrfs: delete inline extents when we find them during logging

Apparently when we do inline extents we allow the data to overlap the last chunk
of the btrfs_file_extent_item, which means that we can possibly have a
btrfs_file_extent_item that isn't actually as large as a btrfs_file_extent_item.
This messes with us when we try to overwrite the extent when logging new extents
since we expect for it to be the right size.  To fix this just delete the item
and try to do the insert again which will give us the proper sized
btrfs_file_extent_item.  This fixes a panic where map_private_extent_buffer
would blow up because we're trying to write past the end of the leaf.  Thanks,

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: default avatarJosef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com>
parent 83c8266a
......@@ -3300,6 +3300,7 @@ static int log_one_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
int index = log->log_transid % 2;
bool skip_csum = BTRFS_I(inode)->flags & BTRFS_INODE_NODATASUM;
insert:
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&ordered_sums);
btrfs_init_map_token(&token);
key.objectid = btrfs_ino(inode);
......@@ -3315,6 +3316,23 @@ static int log_one_extent(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
leaf = path->nodes[0];
fi = btrfs_item_ptr(leaf, path->slots[0],
struct btrfs_file_extent_item);
/*
* If we are overwriting an inline extent with a real one then we need
* to just delete the inline extent as it may not be large enough to
* have the entire file_extent_item.
*/
if (ret && btrfs_token_file_extent_type(leaf, fi, &token) ==
BTRFS_FILE_EXTENT_INLINE) {
ret = btrfs_del_item(trans, log, path);
btrfs_release_path(path);
if (ret) {
path->really_keep_locks = 0;
return ret;
}
goto insert;
}
btrfs_set_token_file_extent_generation(leaf, fi, em->generation,
&token);
if (test_bit(EXTENT_FLAG_PREALLOC, &em->flags)) {
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment