Commit 1354e1a1 authored by David Sterba's avatar David Sterba

btrfs: use mutex in btrfs_resume_balance_async

While the spinlock does not cause problems, using the mutex is more
correct and consistent with others. The global status of balance is eg.
checked from btrfs_pause_balance or btrfs_cancel_balance with mutex.

Resuming balance happens during mount or ro->rw remount. In the former
case, no other user of the balance_ctl exists, in the latter, balance
cannot run until the ro/rw transition is finished.
Reviewed-by: default avatarAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
parent 008ef096
...@@ -3959,12 +3959,12 @@ int btrfs_resume_balance_async(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info) ...@@ -3959,12 +3959,12 @@ int btrfs_resume_balance_async(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info)
{ {
struct task_struct *tsk; struct task_struct *tsk;
spin_lock(&fs_info->balance_lock); mutex_lock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
if (!fs_info->balance_ctl) { if (!fs_info->balance_ctl) {
spin_unlock(&fs_info->balance_lock); mutex_unlock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
return 0; return 0;
} }
spin_unlock(&fs_info->balance_lock); mutex_unlock(&fs_info->balance_mutex);
if (btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, SKIP_BALANCE)) { if (btrfs_test_opt(fs_info, SKIP_BALANCE)) {
btrfs_info(fs_info, "force skipping balance"); btrfs_info(fs_info, "force skipping balance");
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment