mm/memcontrol.c: s/stealed/stolen/

A grammatical fix.

Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

mm/memcontrol.c

@@ -1332,8 +1332,8 @@ static void mem_cgroup_end_move(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 /*
  * 2 routines for checking "mem" is under move_account() or not.
  *
- * mem_cgroup_stealed() - checking a cgroup is mc.from or not. This is used
- *			  for avoiding race in accounting. If true,
+ * mem_cgroup_stolen() -  checking whether a cgroup is mc.from or not. This
+ *			  is used for avoiding races in accounting.  If true,
  *			  pc->mem_cgroup may be overwritten.
  *
  * mem_cgroup_under_move() - checking a cgroup is mc.from or mc.to or
@@ -1341,7 +1341,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_end_move(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
  *			  waiting at hith-memory prressure caused by "move".
  */
 
-static bool mem_cgroup_stealed(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+static bool mem_cgroup_stolen(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
 {
 	VM_BUG_ON(!rcu_read_lock_held());
 	return atomic_read(&memcg->moving_account) > 0;
@@ -1389,7 +1389,7 @@ static bool mem_cgroup_wait_acct_move(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
  * Take this lock when
  * - a code tries to modify page's memcg while it's USED.
  * - a code tries to modify page state accounting in a memcg.
- * see mem_cgroup_stealed(), too.
+ * see mem_cgroup_stolen(), too.
  */
 static void move_lock_mem_cgroup(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
 				  unsigned long *flags)
@@ -1932,9 +1932,9 @@ void __mem_cgroup_begin_update_page_stat(struct page *page,
 	 * If this memory cgroup is not under account moving, we don't
 	 * need to take move_lock_page_cgroup(). Because we already hold
 	 * rcu_read_lock(), any calls to move_account will be delayed until
-	 * rcu_read_unlock() if mem_cgroup_stealed() == true.
+	 * rcu_read_unlock() if mem_cgroup_stolen() == true.
 	 */
-	if (!mem_cgroup_stealed(memcg))
+	if (!mem_cgroup_stolen(memcg))
 		return;
 
 	move_lock_mem_cgroup(memcg, flags);