Commit 15beab0a authored by Dmitry Bezrukov's avatar Dmitry Bezrukov Committed by David S. Miller

net: atlantic: checksum compat issue

Yet another checksum offload compatibility issue was found.

The known issue is that AQC HW marks tcp packets with 0xFFFF checksum
as invalid (1). This is workarounded in driver, passing all the suspicious
packets up to the stack for further csum validation.

Another HW problem (2) is that it hides invalid csum of LRO aggregated
packets inside of the individual descriptors. That was workarounded
by forced scan of all LRO descriptors for checksum errors.

However the scan logic was joint for both LRO and multi-descriptor
packets (jumbos). And this causes the issue.

We have to drop LRO packets with the detected bad checksum
because of (2), but we have to pass jumbo packets to stack because of (1).

When using windows tcp partner with jumbo frames but with LSO disabled
driver discards such frames as bad checksummed. But only LRO frames
should be dropped, not jumbos.

On such a configurations tcp stream have a chance of drops and stucks.

(1) 76f254d4 ("net: aquantia: tcp checksum 0xffff being handled incorrectly")
(2) d08b9a0a ("net: aquantia: do not pass lro session with invalid tcp checksum")

Fixes: d08b9a0a ("net: aquantia: do not pass lro session with invalid tcp checksum")
Signed-off-by: default avatarDmitry Bezrukov <dbezrukov@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIgor Russkikh <irusskikh@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDmitry Bogdanov <dbogdanov@marvell.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 4e867c9a
......@@ -351,7 +351,8 @@ int aq_ring_rx_clean(struct aq_ring_s *self,
err = 0;
goto err_exit;
}
if (buff->is_error || buff->is_cso_err) {
if (buff->is_error ||
(buff->is_lro && buff->is_cso_err)) {
buff_ = buff;
do {
next_ = buff_->next,
......
......@@ -78,7 +78,8 @@ struct __packed aq_ring_buff_s {
u32 is_cleaned:1;
u32 is_error:1;
u32 is_vlan:1;
u32 rsvd3:4;
u32 is_lro:1;
u32 rsvd3:3;
u16 eop_index;
u16 rsvd4;
};
......
......@@ -823,6 +823,8 @@ static int hw_atl_b0_hw_ring_rx_receive(struct aq_hw_s *self,
}
}
buff->is_lro = !!(HW_ATL_B0_RXD_WB_STAT2_RSCCNT &
rxd_wb->status);
if (HW_ATL_B0_RXD_WB_STAT2_EOP & rxd_wb->status) {
buff->len = rxd_wb->pkt_len %
AQ_CFG_RX_FRAME_MAX;
......@@ -835,8 +837,7 @@ static int hw_atl_b0_hw_ring_rx_receive(struct aq_hw_s *self,
rxd_wb->pkt_len > AQ_CFG_RX_FRAME_MAX ?
AQ_CFG_RX_FRAME_MAX : rxd_wb->pkt_len;
if (HW_ATL_B0_RXD_WB_STAT2_RSCCNT &
rxd_wb->status) {
if (buff->is_lro) {
/* LRO */
buff->next = rxd_wb->next_desc_ptr;
++ring->stats.rx.lro_packets;
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment