Commit 16160e3d authored by Damien Lespiau's avatar Damien Lespiau Committed by Daniel Vetter

drm/i915/skl: Make 'end' of the DDB allocation entry exclusive

Ville suggested that we should use the same semantics as C arrays to
reduce the number of those pesky +1/-1 in the allocation code.

This patch leaves the debugfs file as is, showing the internal DDB
allocation structure, not the values written in the registers.

v2: Remove the test on ->end in skl_ddb_entry_size() (Ville)
Reviewed-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Suggested-by: default avatarVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
parent 08db6652
......@@ -1388,16 +1388,12 @@ struct ilk_wm_values {
};
struct skl_ddb_entry {
uint16_t start, end; /* in number of blocks */
uint16_t start, end; /* in number of blocks, 'end' is exclusive */
};
static inline uint16_t skl_ddb_entry_size(const struct skl_ddb_entry *entry)
{
/* end not set, clearly no allocation here. start can be 0 though */
if (entry->end == 0)
return 0;
return entry->end - entry->start + 1;
return entry->end - entry->start;
}
static inline bool skl_ddb_entry_equal(const struct skl_ddb_entry *e1,
......
......@@ -3040,7 +3040,7 @@ skl_ddb_get_pipe_allocation_limits(struct drm_device *dev,
pipe_size = ddb_size / config->num_pipes_active;
alloc->start = nth_active_pipe * ddb_size / config->num_pipes_active;
alloc->end = alloc->start + pipe_size - 1;
alloc->end = alloc->start + pipe_size;
}
static unsigned int skl_cursor_allocation(const struct intel_wm_config *config)
......@@ -3055,6 +3055,8 @@ static void skl_ddb_entry_init_from_hw(struct skl_ddb_entry *entry, u32 reg)
{
entry->start = reg & 0x3ff;
entry->end = (reg >> 16) & 0x3ff;
if (entry->end)
entry->end += 1;
}
void skl_ddb_get_hw_state(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
......@@ -3131,7 +3133,7 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
}
cursor_blocks = skl_cursor_allocation(config);
ddb->cursor[pipe].start = alloc.end - cursor_blocks + 1;
ddb->cursor[pipe].start = alloc.end - cursor_blocks;
ddb->cursor[pipe].end = alloc.end;
alloc_size -= cursor_blocks;
......@@ -3165,7 +3167,7 @@ skl_allocate_pipe_ddb(struct drm_crtc *crtc,
total_data_rate);
ddb->plane[pipe][plane].start = start;
ddb->plane[pipe][plane].end = start + plane_blocks - 1;
ddb->plane[pipe][plane].end = start + plane_blocks;
start += plane_blocks;
}
......@@ -3453,6 +3455,15 @@ static void skl_compute_wm_results(struct drm_device *dev,
r->wm_linetime[pipe] = p_wm->linetime;
}
static void skl_ddb_entry_write(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, uint32_t reg,
const struct skl_ddb_entry *entry)
{
if (entry->end)
I915_WRITE(reg, (entry->end - 1) << 16 | entry->start);
else
I915_WRITE(reg, 0);
}
static void skl_write_wm_values(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
const struct skl_wm_values *new)
{
......@@ -3480,13 +3491,12 @@ static void skl_write_wm_values(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv,
I915_WRITE(CUR_WM_TRANS(pipe), new->cursor_trans[pipe]);
for (i = 0; i < intel_num_planes(crtc); i++)
I915_WRITE(PLANE_BUF_CFG(pipe, i),
new->ddb.plane[pipe][i].end << 16 |
new->ddb.plane[pipe][i].start);
skl_ddb_entry_write(dev_priv,
PLANE_BUF_CFG(pipe, i),
&new->ddb.plane[pipe][i]);
I915_WRITE(CUR_BUF_CFG(pipe),
new->ddb.cursor[pipe].end << 16 |
new->ddb.cursor[pipe].start);
skl_ddb_entry_write(dev_priv, CUR_BUF_CFG(pipe),
&new->ddb.cursor[pipe]);
}
}
}
......
Markdown is supported
0%
or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment